User talk:TheShubh77

This is TheShubh77's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome![edit]

Hi TheShubh77! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:28, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ZongMu Technology (October 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't yet meet WP:NORG criteria.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ZongMu Technology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 08:52, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have resubmitted the draft with necessary changes. Can you please look into it again? TheShubh77 (talk) 17:34, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheShubh77! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 08:52, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, TheShubh77. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:ZongMu Technology, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:28, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have resubmitted the draft with necessary changes. Can you please look into it again? TheShubh77 (talk) 17:35, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2021 Squid Game cryptocurrency scam (October 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2021 Squid Game cryptocurrency scam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 14:10, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have resubmitted the draft with necessary changes. Can you please look into it again? TheShubh77 (talk) 15:10, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2021 Squid Game cryptocurrency scam has been accepted[edit]

2021 Squid Game cryptocurrency scam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 16:57, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad to hear that my article has been accepted! I will continue contributing to Wikipedia with high-quality and reliable information. TheShubh77 (talk) 17:37, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fire of Love: Red (2023 film) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fire of Love: Red (2023 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire of Love: Red (2023 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:55, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023[edit]

Hello, TheShubh77, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Kingcherry2020 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:41, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from YourStory, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. I realize you were not the original article creator. However, you are the article creator since it was originally deleted. According to WP:SPEEDY, you would not be allowed to remove a speedy deletion tag. As opposed to restore the tag (you removed it twice), I sent the article to a deletion discussion which can be found here. CNMall41 (talk) 03:08, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ZongMu Technology moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to ZongMu Technology. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because the references used are very limited in quality, and very strong in churnalism. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:38, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Got it! TheShubh77 (talk) 19:40, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited TrashCon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Founder. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. I have removed that link. 👍 TheShubh77 (talk) 06:55, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Fire of Love: Red (2023 film) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Fire of Love: Red (2023 film). Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:05, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheShubh77. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 10:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheShubh77 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia administrators,

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to appeal the block on my Wikipedia account (TheShubh77). I understand that I was blocked due to the use of multiple accounts, namely Kingcherry2020 and TheWikiVerse. I would like to explain the circumstances surrounding these accounts and clarify my intentions.

When I was new to Wikipedia, I created those two accounts, Kingcherry2020 and TheWikiVerse, with the intention of exploring how to contribute to Wikipedia. I wanted to learn how to write articles, upload media, and understand the platform better. Unfortunately, I chose fictional names for these accounts.

As I gained experience and familiarity with Wikipedia, I decided to create a new account, TheShubh77, using my real name. Since then, I have used only this account for all my contributions. You can verify this by checking my edit history, which clearly shows that all my significant contributions have been made from TheShubh77 account.

I acknowledge that using multiple accounts is not in line with Wikipedia's policies, and I sincerely apologize for any confusion this may have caused. My intention was never malicious; it was solely to learn and contribute to the platform.

I kindly request that you consider unblocking my current account, TheShubh77, as it is the only Wikipedia account I use. You may continue to keep Kingcherry2020 and TheWikiVerse accounts blocked as per your policies.

I am passionate about contributing to Wikipedia and have made significant efforts to improve its content. I would like to continue doing so and rectify my earlier mistake by adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines.

Thank you for your understanding, and I hope for a positive resolution to this appeal.

Sincerely,

Shubham Bhamare TheShubh77 (talk) 12:54, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TheShubh77 (talk) 12:57, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This was probably written by an AI chat bot. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:41, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: ZongMu Technology (November 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Voorts was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ZongMu Technology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

voorts (talk/contributions) 21:35, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fire of Love: Red (2023 film)[edit]

Hello, TheShubh77. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fire of Love: Red (2023 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:ZongMu Technology[edit]

Hello, TheShubh77. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ZongMu Technology, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fire of Love: Red (2023 film)[edit]

Hello, TheShubh77. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fire of Love: Red".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:ZongMu Technology[edit]

Hello, TheShubh77. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ZongMu Technology".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:45, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]