User talk:TheManishPanwar/Archive 1

I assume this admin help request refers to the discussion at the bottom of the page about a supposed block, although you don't say so. If you post a request for help template again then put it with your question. It isn't reasonable to expect editors to search all over the page to see what you are referring to. JBW (talk) 09:11, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, TheManishPanwar! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Writing an article
• Five pillars of Wikipedia
• Community portal
• Help pages
• The Teahouse (newcomer help)
• Main help desk

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! 𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊|🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦|☎️|📄 12:07, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank You Sir TheManishPanwar (talk) 12:27, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dhoundiyal (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dhoundiyal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dhoundiyal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 12:27, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Manishpanwar1999! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 12:27, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sachidanand Bharti (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sachidanand Bharti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sachidanand Bharti, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 12:29, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Manish Panwar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Manish Panwar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PamD 08:35, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Rawat, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. If you have sources from which to create a new well-referenced article, perhaps Rawat (caste), then please do so. Do not disrupt the encyclopedia by repeatedly adding a large paragraph of unsourced text to a disambiguation page. PamD 08:45, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello. Your recent edit to List of people from Uttarakhand appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:27, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Indic script

- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Narendra Singh Negi, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 15:13, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of people from Uttarakhand. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
Please stop adding people who do not have their own article on the English Wikipedia, as was requested above - Arjayay (talk) 11:01, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Kishan Mahipal moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kishan Mahipal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 17:14, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kishan Mahipal (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kishan Mahipal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kishan Mahipal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:14, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kishan Mahipal (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kishan Mahipal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kishan Mahipal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil665 21:39, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Bironkhal moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bironkhal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 17:12, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dhoundiyal (surname) (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dhoundiyal (surname) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dhoundiyal (surname), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:00, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Translation request

Hi TheManishPanwar, I see you say you can translate English pages to Hindi. Could you please create a Hindi language version of the page Great Legalisation Movement India? Helper201 (talk) 19:59, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Ok no promblem I create@Helper201 TheManishPanwar (talk) 06:50, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

ग्रेट लीगलाइजेशन मूवमेंट इंडिया translated completed TheManishPanwar (talk) 07:21, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! Helper201 (talk) 03:14, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

CUPIDICAE💕 18:24, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank You Maam TheManishPanwar (talk) 18:45, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bironkhal (April 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by 331dot were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bironkhal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bironkhal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 18:04, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Misuse of WP:RFPP

Please make sure you understand WP:Protection criteria before posting any more reports. You've cited two instances of "High IP vandalism" where there is no evidence of that. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:47, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022

Hello, I'm ScottishFinnishRadish. I noticed that you recently removed content from Garhwali language without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:55, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Panwar dynasty, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rana, Negi and Bisht. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

List of temples in Uttarakhand moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of temples in Uttarakhand, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 22:37, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Alternate accounts

Hi. I understand that you have an alternate account WP:VALIDALT at DotServer (talk · contribs), disclosing that on your userpage is a good practice [1]. I'll remind you that using alternate accounts for illegitimate purposes is not allowed WP:SOCK. I'll be cross=posting this on DotServer's talk page as well — DaxServer (t · m · c) 20:02, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

P.S. If you have more alternate accounts, I'd advise disclosing them as well — DaxServer (t · m · c) 20:04, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Now this edit giving barnstar to DotServer is wierd and I'd say personally that it's borderline illegitimate. Please do not repeat it again — DaxServer (t · m · c) 20:12, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheManishPanwar. I believe your use of multiple accounts has more than crossed the line 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:51, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of temples in Uttarakhand (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of temples in Uttarakhand and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of temples in Uttarakhand, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:34, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of temples in Uttarakhand (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of temples in Uttarakhand and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of temples in Uttarakhand, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 09:35, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

See this Also Sir/Madam

List of temples in Goa - Wikipedia

You also put this in the draft. TheManishPanwar (talk) 10:18, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi TheManishPanwar! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, List of temples in Goa, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Hello TheManishPanwar. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:TheManishPanwar. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=TheManishPanwar|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:02, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:TheManishPanwar, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=TheManishPanwar|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:32, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Free For article @Timtrent TheManishPanwar (talk) 17:43, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Not Paid@Timtrent TheManishPanwar (talk) 17:43, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Please consider that with care. You appear to be a staff member of one of the power corporations whose article you edit. See https://www.flickr.com/photos/195542768@N04/52148261086/ the declared file source on Commons of the file uploaded by your alleged Bot account. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:14, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

sorry if my words are bad i am newbie@Timtrent TheManishPanwar (talk) 18:18, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

This is nothing to do with your words. It is to do with your behaviour. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheManishPanwar will reach a conclusion soon. You are free to offer evidence at that investigation. I encourage you to do so 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:23, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank You Sir/Madam TheManishPanwar (talk) 18:27, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello Sir/Madam My Account Blocked Why TheManishPanwar (talk) 07:09, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Have I spread vandalism? TheManishPanwar (talk) 07:10, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

You abused multiple accounts This destroys the Community's ability to trust the Sock puppeteer. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:56, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Timtrent expressed concern over this image, https://www.flickr.com/photos/195542768@N04/52148261086/ indicating you are editing about an employer. Can you address that? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:40, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra I express my concern again. I see this as indicative that this editor is an employee of that corporation. I will take a great deal of convincing that this is not the case. I do not see why a person who is not an employee or or is not paid by or receives some benefit from the corporation (broadly construed) would have this corporate logo. I look forward to their explanation. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:25, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

I think there's more chance of copyvio than coi. Their logo is on their website (https://www.upcl.org/). At the very bottom of which says, "All rights reserved". —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 17:41, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

@CX Zoom: Yeah. Thought that too. @TheManishPanwar: Did you grab that logo off the company website and upload it to Flickr? If so, you've violated their copyright on Flikr. Which is not really my problem as we can likely use the image under WP:FAIRUSE in an article here, if it's properly tagged. Don't know what their sysops would say over there, probably nothing good. If you did that, it would allay my WP:conflict of interest concern. I'm sure we can clear up all these issues and unblock you. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:13, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Just a heads up, their "bot account" has uploaded several copyvio images on commons and used them here. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

That's the thing. Now, we can use copyrighted elsewhere images under fair use if they are upfront about the source. Claiming the images as their own pushes us into COI territory. Just declined UTRS ticket for that other account. I really second guessed my block of this account-- now I feel I was right. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:41, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

The more I read DotServer, the less WP:AGF I have. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:44, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

I've had them both on my watchlist for a few months with the assumption this would be happening eventually. When I initially saw this I figured it was a matter of time. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:47, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Flickrwashing is a known problem, and will lead to indefinite blocks on Commons. Several of us are alert to their mis'understanding' of statements on Commons when uploading files. c:User talk:DotServer bears witness to that issue. @Deepfriedokra might I suggest you consider requesting action on Commons? 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:47, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Damn. I don't know my way around there --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:49, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, @Timtrent:. @TheManishPanwar: having seen what you've been doing on commons, I am convinced you have some sort of undisclosed conflict of interest and that you are an undicslosed paid editor. I am further convinced you were using two accounts, pretending to be two different people, to somehow obfuscate your activities. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Why blocked my account?

Why blocked my account?@Teahouse @EdJohnston

Have I spread vandalism?

I have created another account as many volunteers are also maintained. TheManishPanwar (talk) 07:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

When you use alternate account, you should disclose it by advertising it on your userpages, see User:CX Zoom Alt as example. You also need to ensure that every Wikipedia policy including edit-warring rule is applied on a person by person basis, not on an account by account basis. So, if you do 2 undos with one account, and only 1 with another, it will still be counted as violation. You should've read WP:SOCK very carefully before creating one. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 07:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

As an aside, not directly related to your block, but see #Alternate accounts section above. Creating an account "DotServer" so close to "DaxServer"'s username, and failing to disclose it is pretty much an impersonation attempt. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 07:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

How to Unblock my accounts sir TheManishPanwar (talk) 08:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

This particular account is unblocked. "DotServer" is blocked. For normal editing, you can continue with one account. Tbh, there is nothing I see on your alt account, that you need to use both. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 08:13, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

This account is also blocked.@TheManishPanwar TheManishPanwar (talk) 08:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

This account's block log is clean. Try editing a page. If you can't do that, add {{admin help}} on this page with your problem. An admin will try to help you out. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 08:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

There is no direct block on this account. You may be affected by an IP block or an autoblock. If so, there's nothing we can do about it unless you tell us what block it is. What does it say in the message you see when you try to edit,telling you that you can't? (Also please read my message near to the top of the page.) JBW (talk) 09:11, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

This account is also blocked.not editing TheManishPanwar (talk) 10:33, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra Please Unblock Me Madam/Sir TheManishPanwar (talk) 10:51, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Yes, I created another account but didn't sabotage

@DotServer And @TheManishPanwar These are both my accounts. TheManishPanwar (talk) 10:56, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Don't know why you paged me. Your WP:sockpuppet account is blocked per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheManishPanwar. The blocking admin, EdJohnston, recommending blocking this account too. How long a block is needed to convince you not to create sock puppets? Right now this account is likely WP:AUTOBLOCKed. That means the shared IP is blocked to prevent further disruption/sock puppetry. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Looking at all the warnings on this talk page, you could be blocked for disruption. What does "as many volunteers are also maintained, " mean? Does more than one person have access to this account?

Ima block this account directly. To be unblocked you will need to agree to not sharing any account and to using only one account. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

You will need to also show you have read and show you will heed WP:COI and WP:PAID, because it looks like you are an undeclared paid editor --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

I am not a paid editor. TheManishPanwar (talk) 12:15, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

and i want to have this account@TheManishPanwar

And delete this account@DotServer TheManishPanwar (talk) 12:19, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Dotserver is blocked, so that's all set. What does "as many volunteers are also maintained, " mean? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Deepfriedokra, not wikilawyering but this was part was due to a language barrier. The full sentence I have created another account as many volunteers are also maintained. referred to "I created another account, but many others also do it" referring to their lack of understanding of WP:VALIDALT, although they were served with a notice from DaxServer regarding the same, which they chose to completely ignore. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 12:34, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

@CX Zoom: Oh, good. Thanks. (sigh of relief). That fixes that. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:37, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts, disruptive editing, possible sharing accounts, and possible undeclared paid editing. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Any reviewing admin should feel free to unblock or modify this block at their discretion.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheManishPanwar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here TheManishPanwar (talk) 10:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)}

Decline reason:

"Your reason here" is not a reason to unblock you. In a new request, please make a statement telling what you did wrong, how you will correct it, and what edits you wish to make. Please place it at the bottom of the page for proper discussion flow. 331dot (talk) 13:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheManishPanwar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm not spreading vandalism TheManishPanwar (talk) 13:43, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are accused of abusing multiple accounts, disruptive editing, possible sharing accounts, and possible undeclared paid editing. Your next unblock request should address these reasons. PhilKnight (talk) 14:11, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• This editor has a short duration preventative block, currentky set to expire a week after it was implemented. I am very much interested in their edit pattern, having created the sock puppet investigation. I am also interested in how they comment upon the consideration by others that they have not complied with WP:PAID, together with their deceptive claim that their puppet was a Bot account, together with a spurious Bot Authorisation Request page.

In the event that a satsfactory set of replies is not made, may I request Deepfriedokra as blockiong administrator to consider alone or with others at their discretion, whether the week is sufficiently preventative. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:36, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

@Timtrent: Will wait to see how things go after the block expires. There is still the possible explanation of over exuberance and inexperience, however remote. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:28, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Hello, I'm ManaliJain. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bhuvan Bam have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ManaliJain (talk) 11:47, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Whatever content you want to add on Wikipedia articles has to be verifiable, which means that reliable sources must be able to support the material. Please read: WP:REFBEGIN, WP:VERIFY, WP:RELIABLE, WP:ICTFSOURCES and WP:RSP. If you need anymore help, check out Wikipedia:Questions. Thanks, ManaliJain (talk) 11:50, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sachidanand Bharti

Hello, TheManishPanwar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sachidanand Bharti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kendriya Bhandar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kendriya Bhandar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://kendriyabhandar.org/index.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Berrely • ^T∕_C 17:00, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

Hello. Your recent edit to List of schools in Delhi appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:04, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Jagwal. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 01:07, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kishan Mahipal

Hello, TheManishPanwar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kishan Mahipal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:04, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Dhoundiyal (surname)

Hello, TheManishPanwar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dhoundiyal (surname), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kishan Mahipal

Hello, TheManishPanwar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kishan Mahipal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:48, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dhoundiyal (surname)

Hello, TheManishPanwar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dhoundiyal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:26, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bironkhal (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bironkhal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 21:28, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Chandpur Fort moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chandpur Fort, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:41, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

@Onel5969 Why is my article put in draft? TheManishPanwar (talk) 13:11, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

None of the sources go in-depth about the subject. In fact, 2 of them did not even mention the fort. In addition, the article needs work for grammar and sentence structure. Hope this helps. It might be notable, but you need in-depth coverage to show that notability. Hope that helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:14, 4 October 2022 (UTC)