User talk:Tastayeb

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PrimeBank BD, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 12:53, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of PrimeBank BD (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 14:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tastayeb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I work for Prime Bank as a communications manager, and was trying to update the page of the Bank. I was in a hurry and did not realize that I should not create an official account for this. So when I was notified of that, I tried to create a personal account with my personal email address to be able to update the content of the page. The board of the Bank has a New Chairman, along with new vice chairman, and some of the information provided in the page are outdated. I apologies if I have violated any rules of the community, and would like to request the unblocking of my account so that I can update the Wikipedia page of the Bank with latest information/data to avoid any misinformation. Your kind support in this would be highly appreciated. Tastayeb (talk) 18:37, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We aren't interested in having you continue to violate WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. If this is your only goal, this is the end of the line. If instead you wish to write about subject areas for which you have no conflict of interest, convince us you understand why your edits were inappropriate and tell us what you'd write about instead. You'd also need to commit to sticking with one account, going forward, to avoid any further violations of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. Yamla (talk) 18:50, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tastayeb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I'll be more careful in the future. I will only use this "Tastayeb" account for any editing in the future, and would like to have the user account "PrimeBank BD" that I had created earlier initially using my official email ID. It would be very helpful though if you could kindly suggest how the Bank's page can be updated with the correct information/data to avoid misinformation. Tastayeb (talk) 19:10, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were explicitly told that you, as a person, will not be unblocked to write about your employer. MER-C 11:37, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.