User talk:TXTruthFinder

August 2019

Hello, I'm Bradv. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Texans for Vaccine Choice seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – bradv🍁 14:17, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Texans for Vaccine Choice. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 17:04, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

TXTruthFinder (talk) 17:18, 14 August 2019 (UTC)Reply: There is no reason my edit should be considered vandalism. The original summary should be considered slander, as there is no evidence of an anti-vaccine position, only a neutral position from this group. My sources are legislators who work in Austin within close proximity with this group.

Furthermore, if a group or person does not have the right to define themselves, then who does? TXTruthFinder (talk) 17:12, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

TFVC

There is no reason my edit should be considered vandalism. The original summary should be considered slander, as there is no evidence of an anti-vaccine position, only a neutral position from this group. My sources are legislators who work in Austin within close proximity with this group.

Furthermore, if a group or person does not have the right to define themselves, then who does? TXTruthFinder (talk) 17:12, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

TXTruthFinder, have you read the advice I gave you in response to your message on my talk page? – bradv🍁 17:19, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

TXTruthFinder (talk) 17:31, 14 August 2019 (UTC)Reply: I went back and replied>

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Texans for Vaccine Choice, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 17:42, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

I'm sure that no one likes their favorite page being edited, but unfortunately what was there is no more because it simply isn't true. If you continue to make nonconstructive remarks, you may be subject to the same blocking policy. Thank you.TXTruthFinder (talk) 17:52, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Texans for Vaccine Choice. Praxidicae (talk) 17:44, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Reply:I'm sure that no one likes their favorite page being edited, but unfortunately what was there is no more because it simply isn't true. If you continue to make nonconstructive remarks, you may be subject to the same blocking policy. Thank you.TXTruthFinder (talk) 17:52, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

It would probably behoove you to actually read the links here. Praxidicae (talk) 17:52, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Post 1932 American Politics Discretionary Sanctions (Advisement)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 17:48, 14 August 2019 (UTC)