User talk:TRUEV140

Welcome[edit]

Hello, TRUEV140, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:12, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Financial bloat[edit]

Hi there, re: this edit, it's obvious that you meant well, but I don't particularly see the utility of including sixth and seventh week financial data for the film simply because we have it. Typically we expect to see information about a film's first day, first weekend, maybe first week, and then the lifetime gross. If there's something significant about the in-between dates, like some world event triggered a surge of viewership in the sixth week, then maybe I could see that, but it seems like unnecessary detail that doesn't materially improve our understanding of the film. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:12, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja (film). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. You added this source for Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja. The IBTimes source is an exact duplicate of a report from Onlookersmedia, which is an unreliable source. IBTimes itself refer it in it. That [unreliable] report also tells that the figure [32cr] is including the money from selling various rights. Essex-1799 (talk) 18:19, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja (film), you may be blocked from editing. [1] For re-adding challenged contents again and again without any explanation. Edit warring. Essex-1799 (talk) 16:24, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pazhassiraja[edit]

Hi, this source from TOI you used to cite the box office in Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja (film) is a disputed source, which is not its genuine collection. It's an obvious mistake from the editing side. And the "only source" that reported it, neither TOI has reported it again. In fact, in their another report in 2015, listed the top 5 Malayalam grossers (ranging 75-25 crore), they haven't included Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja. Now forget it, I bet you cannot find any other reliable source reporting 49 crore, not even a single source. Can you ?. But there are other sources, that reports its box office during its running time, and over. KVPR released on 16 Oct 2009, per this report from Sify, it grossed 13 crore in 42 days, and per this (on Jan 2010) cites its 70 days gross as 18 crore, but this report from India Today gave 15 crore as collection. Indiaglitz gave its 100 days gross as 17 crore (Indiaglitz is not acceptable per Wiki consensus, anyway it gave a similar figure, that's the point). Apart, its producer has officially declared its total collection as 20 crore, in a press meet in Kochi, as reported by NDTV "one year" after its release, that means its lifetime gross. So the TOI report of 49 cr is an obvious mistake. Also remember, Twenty:20 grossed 32 crore, and when Drishyam became the highest grosser, sources reported that it broke the record of Twenty:20, not KVPR.--Essex-1799 (talk) 09:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja (film). Essex-1799 (talk) 06:48, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja (film). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:58, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, TRUEV140. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja (film)[edit]

This is the third time I am discussing about it. IF YOU CAN READ, re-posting my previous discussions,

"You added this source for Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja. The IBTimes source is an exact duplicate of a report from Onlookersmedia, which is an unreliable source. IBTimes itself refer it in it. That [unreliable] report also tells that the figure [32cr] is including the money from selling various rights."

"Hi, this source from TOI you used to cite the box office in Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja (film) is a disputed source, which is not its genuine collection. It's an obvious mistake from the editing side. And the "only source" that reported it, neither TOI has reported it again. In fact, in their another report in 2015, listed the top 5 Malayalam grossers (ranging 75-25 crore), they haven't included Kerala Varma Pazhassi Raja. Now forget it, I bet you cannot find any other reliable source reporting 49 crore, not even a single source. Can you ?. But there are other sources, that reports its box office during its running time, and over. KVPR released on 16 Oct 2009, per this report from Sify, it grossed 13 crore in 42 days, and per this (on Jan 2010) cites its 70 days gross as 18 crore, but this report from India Today gave 15 crore as collection. Indiaglitz gave its 100 days gross as 17 crore (Indiaglitz is not acceptable per Wiki consensus, anyway it gave a similar figure, that's the point). Apart, its producer has officially declared its total collection as 20 crore, in a press meet in Kochi, as reported by NDTV "one year" after its release, that means its lifetime gross. So the TOI report of 49 cr is an obvious mistake. Also remember, Twenty:20 grossed 32 crore, and when Drishyam became the highest grosser, sources reported that it broke the record of Twenty:20, not KVPR."

In this edit, you are deliberately including factual errors. In the claim from the producer, it's "specifically" written it is "according to the producer", since no other correct reliable box office figures are available. In the edit, you added sources from Indiaglitz.com, which is an unreliable source per WP:ICTF, which you very well know. You again re-added the 32cr reference which was challenged. And where in those sources says that the film was a box office success in Delhi, Mumbai, UAE, and US ??. Don't make your own conclusions. You added an unreliable source from Metromatinee too (They them-selves contradict in a later report published in November 11, 2016). And where in that source it says 38cr is "from Kerala" ??. Again you re-added that proven fake 49cr report. Here also, where in the source it says it is "according to the producer" ??. You are deliberately misrepresenting the sources and manipulating the contents by your own original research and adjustments and alterations. It is evident that you are not here to contribute to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a tool to promote your favourite actor and films, that through disruption, faking information, vandalism, IP hopping and edit warring. --Essex-1799 (talk) 11:09, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Essex-1799 (talk) 17:54, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]