User talk:Superdoggo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello, Superdoggo, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Boomer Island (Tasmania) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 08:36, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Why does everyone use wikipedia[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Why does everyone use wikipedia, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 06:13, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Why does everyone use wikipedia[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Why does everyone use wikipedia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Larry Z Contact me my edits 04:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nital. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Eureka Lott 05:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bhai (honorific)[edit]

Notice

The article Bhai (honorific) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

See WP:NAD

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:35, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bhai (honorific) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Bhai (honorific), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 16:29, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhai (honorific) (April 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 07:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Superdoggo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 07:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bruh[edit]

bruh

Speedy deletion nomination of Jehlum.in[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jehlum.in, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GermanKity (talk) 08:20, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion nomination of "Draft:Jehlum"[edit]

Draft:Jehlum, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Ahmetlii (talk) 08:31, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jehlum (May 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 09:29, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pronotacantha armata moved to draftspace[edit]

I've moved your article Pronotacantha armata to draftspace. This is because the article currently does not have sufficient reliable sources to remain published. Please make sure to read our guideline on reliable sources. Once your article has sufficient sourcing, feel free to submit it for review, or if you are confident, move it back to its original location. If you have any questions or would like any help, feel free to contact me! Elli (talk | contribs) 21:08, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bhai (honorific)[edit]

Information icon Hello, Superdoggo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bhai (honorific), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pronotacantha armata[edit]

Information icon Hello, Superdoggo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pronotacantha armata, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pronotacantha armata[edit]

Hello, Superdoggo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pronotacantha armata".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:26, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Loriendrew. An edit that you recently made to Mad scientist seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:31, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Abuta dwyerana[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Abuta dwyerana, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:08, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please slow down[edit]

You have created several articles in mainspace without species boxes, references, formatting or wikilinks. At best they should be drafts, but you should try to write at least one properly before you continue mass production. I've moved a couple to draft space and tidied up a bit, but they still lack species boxes and references Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:31, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also see Aristolochia amara Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:37, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abuta chiapasensis moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Abuta chiapasensis. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because It is attributing itself to Wikipedia and has Manual of Style issues. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Zippybonzo | talk | contribs (he|she|they) 14:24, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abuta bullata for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abuta bullata is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abuta bullata until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Zippybonzo | talk | contribs (he|she|they) 14:35, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Large number of Abuta articles have been moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions. Unfortunately, I've removed a large number of your draft articles to the draft space as I do not think they are ready for publishing at this time because they need more sources to establish notability or they have no sources or they have used Wikipedia as a their only source. I have converted your articles to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. microbiologyMarcus (petri dish·growths) 15:00, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To underscore this a little more - these drafts are not suitable for mainspace. Neither is something like the version of Abuta bullata that you chose to dump there. Have a look at the article's present form; this is what a new species article should look like. Please don't expect everyone to clean up undersourced or unstructured stubs, because that only works as long as everyone puts in a certain minimum effort. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:04, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abuta aristeguietae has been accepted[edit]

Abuta aristeguietae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abuta acutifolia (March 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abuta acutifolia has been accepted[edit]

Abuta acutifolia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:39, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism and close paraphrasing[edit]

There was a problem with the article you created, Abuta fluminum. The information you added about tamarins was copied from this National Geographic article. Specifically, "Tamarins eat the fruit of more than 833 plants from 167 different species." You did then add a comma and spliced in information from elsewhere in the article, but at best that is WP:Close paraphrasing, but since it was not cited it was clearly WP:Plagiarism. Please read about the topics at the linked pages if you are not familiar, but the Wikipedia project has to take this very seriously both for ethical reasons and because if WP:Copyright violations are not dealt with they would open up the project to legal problems. Please avoid this error in the future. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 20:16, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abuta pahnii has been accepted[edit]

Abuta pahnii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes (talk / cont) 22:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Superdoggo&oldid=1213056024"