User talk:Sudarshandz

New edits[edit]

hi

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sudarshandz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page. If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:16, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sudarshandz, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Sudarshandz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

July 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Brackets (text editor)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:30, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive about ownership of articles, which you showed at Sudarshan DZ. The next time you continue to disruptively edit Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Despite your obvious COI, you do not own this article. It is not your decision to move it from article space to draft space - especially as you seem to be doing this as a way to avoid the deletion discussion. 10mmsocket (talk) 07:16, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WayTp Inc. moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, WayTp Inc., is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 01:34, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WayTp Inc. moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, WayTp Inc., is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ASUKITE 02:49, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:WayTp Inc. has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:WayTp Inc.. Thanks! ASUKITE 02:49, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: WayTp Inc. (July 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asukite was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WayTp Inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:WayTp Inc., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ASUKITE 02:54, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shining Alone[edit]

Hello Sudarshandz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Shining Alone for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the album, song or discography is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article of their own.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 05:09, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you Arjun Kanungo? How to request speedy deletion.[edit]

Hi Sudarshandz, and that you for interest in the English language Wikipedia.

If you aren't Arjun Kanungo - and I would advise you to read this - why are you putting references about him in what is quite obviously your autobiography?

I suggest that the best course of action would be for you to ask for that page to be deleted under "WP:G7" - just type {{Db-author}} at the top of that page.

Peter in Australia aka --Shirt58 (talk) 05:16, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sudarshandz, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

10mmsocket (talk) 06:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:09, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]