This is where there is some discussion about 2012. I am ending it right now.
On December 21st, 2012, The Sun will align with the center of the galaxy, causing the earth to wobble,
causing tsunamis, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and more. An asteroid might hit earth. The earth might end. Do you wikipedians rather go to another earthlike world rather then staying on earth? --December21st2012Freak (talk) 23:27, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that the earth will line up with the sun and there may be a small amount more chaos than usual but I don't believe that the world will end. If an asteroid were to come close to earth, they probably will have developed technology that will repel the asteroid. That theory you believe is full of HOOEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Sorry if I was a little impolite. In short, don't worry about that stuff.) Rascal the Peaceful (talk) 18:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh well, On April 13-14, 2036; Asteroid Apophis, the size of a small mountain, will hit Earth. December21st2012Freak (talk) 20:22, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
They probably will have tech that repels asteroids then too (Don't use the talkback template either, I have this on my watchlist). Rascal the Peaceful (talk) 22:18, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just curious, if the world were to end on 12/21/2012, wouldnt the press or the gov'ts be all over this and prep? PS... thats my birthday :O Tdinatale (talk) 23:42, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, we're gunna be screwed from an exploding population and/or global warming anyways.... I plan on moving someplace tropical, learning spanish fluently and growing my own food for that matter. But I question.. the sun being blocked out for 40 years? meh.... Tdinatale (talk) 23:57, 26 August 2009 (UTC) .. Even if it does happen, the great dying occurred and the Cretaceous–Tertiary_extinction_event occured.. historically speaking, it didnt kill everything. Tdinatale (talk) 00:04, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting, but I wouldn't quit my day job just yet. lolTdinatale (talk) 02:10, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You do know that the sun earth and the centre of the galaxy lines up every year on December 21 right???? Because it does. Not so special is it happens every year--Fire 55 (talk) 04:24, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wow i'm born in December whoop whoop. but the world won't explode hopefully —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lori07 (talk • contribs) 18:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Earth? Earth? What the hell's that supposed to mean? There's no such thing as earth. Stop making up gibberish, you infantile fools, Lord Spongefrog,(I am the Czar of all Russias!) 20:43, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have declined your CSD of Jennifer Bertrand (originally at Jennifer bertrand) as the notability has been claimed. She is the host of her own show and a winner in a reality TV series, which establishes her notability. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:59, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and thank you for your work in reverting vandals. However, the edit you made here is actually true: Users may remove warnings if they'd like, hence it is a way of showing that he/she read the warning. ZooFari 00:43, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My page being edited by a guy who believes the world is going to end in 2012.
If you ever do it again, I'll make your world end a bit sooner.
With kind regards,
62.235.138.10 (talk) 21:08, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I think you were a bit harsh issuing that vandalism notice. This edit was not vandalism for say but maybe a name correction or a bad edit (which is not vandalism). Just to let you know. FireCrystal (talk) 18:31, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I was just concerned that you were mislabeling it vandalism when it could be reverted to the last good edit (and not marked as vandalism). Only people that are knowledgeable about the person would know the correct spelling of the person's name and would then call it vandalism. So identifying something like that as vandalism when it may be a correction is pretty much in bad faith. Why are you saying that I should read those two policies? I respect them both. Could you please explain specifically what I done? I was, in no way, in bad faith here. Also, with new users I try to actually help them when I can and I respect them because I was new to Wikipedia once just like everyone else. I'm sorry if I misunderstood after all this. No worries. FireCrystal (talk) 00:40, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
FireCrystal, it seems as if I confused you, and I'm sorry for that! My comment was intended to be aimed at December21st2012Freak. I don't think you did anything wrong; I was just noticing a separate instance of mislabeled vandalism and decided to add my note to the similar section that you had started. (In the case that I'm discussing, the misspelling could be checked by visiting the reference.) Dreamyshade (talk) 02:06, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, what's funny is I did not even know you were someone else entirely than this user until now so I feel pretty stupid. It all makes sense to me now. I was too fast to respond. So no problems. :) FireCrystal (talk) 04:25, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Users are allowed to remove comments from their own talk page, see WP:UP#CMT. While there may be edit warring by the user elsewhere (I haven't looked), removing posts and warnings from their own talk page doesn't qualify for that. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:57, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And actually, the IP was trying to AFD the article, not realising that they couldn't. It wasn't even vandalism. Black Kite 00:39, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The edit which you characterized as vandalism [1] was a good- faith attempt to revert what appears to be spamming [2]. 99.149.84.135 (talk) 01:10, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please be more careful in reverting other editors edits. If their edits aren't simple vandalism, then you really shouldn't be reverting them and warning them with twinkle. Several of your reverts are of edits which could possibly be, or even likely are, in good faith. Take a look at WP:VAND and make sure that the content you are reverting meets that description before doing so. Prodegotalk 02:38, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the Condescension. But no, the edit wasn't a mistake, and maybe if you actually took the time to compare histories you'd realize that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.16.236.2 (talk) 04:51, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{subst:Vangel}}! [midnight comet][talk] 19:15, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello December21st2012Freak, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of William Edwin Rudge - a page you tagged - because: Not unambiguously promotional. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. –Juliancolton | Talk 01:21, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't edit another user's talk page such as you did here. This is especially the case when the user has placed a request for unblock at the talk page. Thanks.--VirtualSteveneed admin support? 03:30, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed the comment that you left to User:Luke adam hudson on my talk page as I think it would best in this situation to leave him alone and I do not think your comment was helping the situation. I also removed your {{talkback}} from his talk page as the comment no longer exists on my talk page. Normal use of the {{talkback}} template is to indicate a comment left for an editor on your own talk page, not somebody else's. While I can not stop you from leaving another comment on his talk page, I strongly suggest that you do not as I don't think it is necessary. Continuing to argue with him will not help matters. I have already warned him that he may be blocked if he continues to post his "article". I don't think leaving him another warning is necessary since he has done no further edits. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:14, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. I noticed you tagged Tanario King with the {{copyvio}} template. Please remember that the template is for those cases, where copyright violation is unclear. If it's evident as in this case, use {{db-copyvio}} instead which will place it in the category to speedy delete it. Regards SoWhy 07:13, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have just granted you rollback rights because I believe you to be trustworthy, and because you have a history of reverting vandalism and have given in the past or are trusted in the future to give appropriate warnings. Please have a read over WP:ROLLBACK and remember that rollback is only for use against obvious vandalism. Please use it that way (it can be taken away by any admin at a moment's notice). You may want to consider adding {{Rollback}} and {{User rollback}} to your userpage. Any questions, please drop me a line. Best of luck and thanks for volunteering! wadester16 01:47, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
For reverting the page blank on my talk page I hereby award you The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar. Keep up the good work! TomStar81 (Talk) 03:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I just love your practical joke I clicked on that link ,found a strange page (I thought it was some kinda mistake)I went to my talk oage and checked out it's history That's when I realised it was a joke :))--Notedgrant (talk) 17:53, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused over the point of this as the sandbox is not going to be deleted and why bother to warn a user, and one that hasn't edited since May, that the page is about to be deleted. While a nonsense warning is unlikely to bother an experienced user it may upset a new user. Thanks. Enter CambridgeBayWeather,waits for audience applause,not a sausage 16:00, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
LOL! I hope I didn't cause any trouble. The sandbox was the best place I could think of to test out Twinkle. --EpochFail(talk|contribs) 20:40, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do you actually mean to nominate the Sandbox for deletion (meaning that there wouldn't be a Sandbox any more), or are you just testing something? If it's a serious nomination, please explain the reason for it or withdraw it, because honestly this isn't going to happen. If you were just testing something out, please let us know so we can delete the MfD. Thanks. Newyorkbrad (talk) 17:22, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You tagged this as blatant advertising. What was it advertising? I deleted it anyway because it was nonsense, but I would ask you to please slow it down and try to be more accurate when tagging for speedy deletion. Thanks--Beeblebrox (talk) 21:00, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for helping to revert all of that vandalism on my userpage. It's amazing that I didn't have to revert any of it because you and a few other people kept beating me to it. --TheCatalyst31Reaction•Creation 23:45, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm very confused. How are this user's edits vandalism?...and why are you edit warring over the warning? --Onorem♠Dil 01:24, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
After looking at the sandbox history, I'll agree that it's not good use of the sandbox to simply add the same information over and over, but I wouldn't call it vandalism...and a templated warning does little to let them know what's wrong with their edits. --Onorem♠Dil 01:30, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The IP had not been sufficiently warned, please make sure you are familiar with the criteria for blocking vandals. Ask me any questions if you have them. ceranthor 01:52, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The IP was edit warring earlier and keeps adding the same text on the Wikipedia Sandbox. And, When I was warning him, he erased the warnings of his page. December21st2012Freak ,(Wanna Chat?) 01:53, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I assumed that the admin who declined your report had checked out the page history. My apologies, I'll contact him/her immediately. ceranthor 02:00, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My error entirely, and I apologize. I am trying to multi-task, and should have been more thorough and either made time to check history, or not commented at all. I am sorry for any delay regarding this due to my insufficient diligence. KillerChihuahua?!?Advice 02:03, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As a newcomer to editing (though I am a long-time user) you got me pretty good with the "you have been banned from editing for vandalism" notice in the sandbox.--Nyctc7 (talk) 00:08, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Lord Spongefrog, Emperor and Autocrat of all the Russias, of Moscow, Kiev, Vladimir, Novgorod, Czar of Kasan and Astrakhan, Czar of Poland, Czar of Siberia, Czar of the Tauric Chersonese, Seignior of Pskov, Prince of Smolensk, Lithuania, Volkynia, Podolia, and Finland, Prince of Esthonia, Livonia, Courland and Semigallia, of Bialystok, Karelia, Sougria, Perm, Viatka, Bulgaria and many other countries; Lord and Sovereign Prince of the territory of Nijni-Novgorod, Tchemigoff, Riazan, Polotsk, Rostov, Jaroslavl, Bielozersk, Oudoria, Obdoria, Kondinia, Vitepsk, and of Mstislaf, Governor of the Hyperborean Regions, Lord of the countries of Iveria, Kartalinia, Grouzinia, Kabardinia, and Armenia, Hereditary Lord and Suzerain of the Scherkess princes, of those of the mountains, and of others; heir of Norway, Duke of Schleswig-Holstein, Stormarn, Dittmarsen and Oldenburg Barnstar
I hereby award you this barnstar for making it in the first place and for actually takeing me seriouslly.--ColdplayExpert 23:36, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
it was in fact a productive edit - someone used a terrible translation service to attempt to add information that was not originally in english and that they did not take the time to format into anything even close to proper language. it was therefore not appropriate to be included in the article.
I'm sure it's only intended as light-hearted humor, but I'm not sure it's such a good idea for someone leaving vandalism and speedy deletion notices to have "talk to me or else" in their signature. New users who are not so familiar with how things work here might actually take that seriously. In the interest of avoiding biting the newcomers, you may want to reconsider. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:51, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I hesitated to l even leave that message because some users can get awfully huffy about such things. I went to get you a barnstar to thank you for your understanding, but as I live in Alaska, I had some trouble and unfortunately your barnstar was eaten by a bear. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:02, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
how do you get the little button that shows what your doing on you user/talk page? (right now it says huggleing)--ColdplayExpert 01:11, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You might want to give this a read. Even the Mayans say, what 98% of most believe, that the 2012 thing is just there to scare the ever-living-bejesus outta of people. Just a thought. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 23:16, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This will make D212012F very mad but I think that this whole thing about 2012 is just like Y2K.--ColdplayExpert 01:08, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I belive that D212012F made that only for fun. Not to say that he endorces vandals in any way. But what do I know? im just a Talk page wacher.--ColdplayExpert 01:10, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless, it's a bit DENYish. It promotes and grants recognition of the completely wrong type of behaviour expected by fellow Wikipedians. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 14:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That user posted vandalism, which I reverted and warned him of. Why did you post that revert warning on my page, then remove it? --Delta1989 (talk/contributions) 22:00, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I thought it was non needed warning on his talk page, and, I saw that you were an experienced editor, Huggle gave you a warning, and I reverted on your talk page. December21st2012Freakchat 22:06, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, that's cool. Thanks for your efforts, and take care! --Delta1989 (talk/contributions) 23:15, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
For all your efforts to keep the wiki clean, I hereby award you the Anti-Vandalism Barnstar. Enjoy! --[midnight comet][talk] 01:02, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not a problem! You deserve it. About WOTD - WOTD is done; next week I'm going to start a new award program; a spinoff of WOTD. It will feature some users who received WOTD in the past and some users who haven't received it at all. --[midnight comet][talk] 02:10, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I mean, testing obscure warnings that you probably will never use is not really that exciting. If in doubt, give 'em the standard {{uw-vandalism1}}.--UnionhawkTalkE-mailReview 12:00, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I, Pepperpiggle, award December21st2012Freak the Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for all the Huggling you did on User talk:Wolfkeeper. I tried to revert the vandalism too, but you beat me to it every time. Keep reverting! *Pepperpiggle**Sign!* 21:46, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I just want to say that your user page is alswome, and I was worndreing if you could sign my gustbook. regards--Orangesodakid 00:49, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
just to show how cool I think your user page is, here is a barnstar
The Excellent User Page Award
for having a excellent user page (that was kind of redundent) regards. --Orangesodakid 00:53, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Thankyou for participating!"Hello Steve2011. Thankyou for participating in my recent RfA. I appreciate it. As you know, it failed (probably due to my own interference), but...there's always next year, Lord Spongefrog,(I am the Czar of all Russias!) 19:09, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed 2 links to your userboxes from Wikipedia:Userboxes/Vandalism and /Misc. This & This If you have any questions, please message me on my talk page. Netalarmtalk 23:44, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The project's discussion board is the best place to ask for help or advice. You might like to watchlist this page, and you are encouraged to take part in any discussion that comes up.
You might wish to add {{AFC status}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. There is also a project userbox. If you haven't done so already, please consider adding your name to the list of participants.
Several of our members monitor an IRC channel, #wikipedia-en-afcconnect, and you are most welcome to join in.
Once again, welcome to the project. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:02, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Steve2011 ,Thank you for participating in my RfA, which passed nearly unanimously with 174 in support, 2 in opposition and 1 neutral votes. Special thanks goes to RegentsPark, Samir and John Carter for their kind nomination and support. I am truly honored by the trust and confidence that the community has placed in me. I thank you for your kind inputs and I will be sincerely looking at the reasons that people opposed me so I can improve in those areas ( including my english ;) ). If you ever need anything please feel free to ask me and I would be happy to help you :). Have a great day ! -- TinuCherian - 06:02, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey december, how ya doing? Just dropped by to say awesome contributions and vandal fighting (hec I may even give you a barnstar in due course!). Oh, and thanks for the vandalism (bet it was good to turn the tables) and guestbook signing. Oh, and BTW, I see your username is becoming a film. I am off to see 2012 by Roland Emmerich (aka the disater movie guy), bet he got the inspiration off you! Good to see ya. AtheWeatherman 16:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, Steve2011! It's my pleasure to award you November 2, 2009's Red Star for being hard working, kind to others, and for being an excellent user in general. A record of this award will always be kept at User:Meaghan/Shining Stars. Enjoy! Meaghanguess who :) 00:03, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You could also receive the next higher up award, the Orange Star!
...ever read the comments? This is not vandalism, it is the correction of something that was not correctly translated from Latin. See malfunction report: User:ClueBot/FalsePositives#C.C3.BA_Faoil --Cú Faoil (talk) 00:51, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Believe this individual is correct, actually. It correctly translates to "penis," not "tail." Hence, "penis" is not vandalism in this case. Ginsengbomb (talk) 00:53, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not every insertion of the word "penis" is vandalism. Consult the linked dictionary and WP:AGF. --Cú Faoil (talk) 01:32, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This user has signed my guestbook and been presented with a barnstar, so sign my guestbook now if you have not yet, NOW!!!--Ezekiel 7:19Le†'s Go Buffalo! (sign)
Hi lord of the Vulcans you may be interested in formatting this page List of Sufi Saints of South Asia ..I think I made some errors there ;) can you help me please --NotedGrantTalk 07:20, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I see your starting your own. Good luck! (Maybe we should change our colors so that way people can make out the diffrence between our two diffrent programs.)--ColdplayExpert 18:07, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Does that mean that you are going to give your first award to yourself?--ColdplayExpert 18:26, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I will give my first award to another Wikipedian, like an Administrator, or the Wikipedia founder, Jimbo Wales. I will not give any to myself. December21st2012FreakLord of the Vulcans 18:28, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well I just noticed you and me joined only 4 days apart form each other. I also saw your stats and Im impressed. Ill consider you for the next award :)--ColdplayExpert 18:30, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hell with that I'm a good editor too see.I corrected a link on CP's talk page today :D (Honest).D2012 thanks for pointing out that citation part in the article I'll try referencing it :)--NotedGrantTalk 18:38, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for welcoming users (though please help me in welcoming those with contributions already, please! It takes forever).-- fetchcomms☛ 04:38, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't care if what I posted about the banjo is not correct. I did that so I can mess up my music teacher. I don't want to finish this music homework that he gave me it is so not fair. Just leave me alone I will change anything that I want to.
--69.141.204.226 (talk) 21:19, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Brooke[reply]
Congratulations, December21st2012Freak! For your kindness to others, your hard work around the wiki, and for being a great user, you have been awarded the "Wikipedian of the Day" award for today, 8, November 2009! Keep up the great work!--ColdplayExpert 18:36, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply] Note: You could also recieve the "Wikipedian of the Week award for this week!
Thank you. (Note that this is my alternative account, this is not a sockpuppet.) Lord of the Vulcans 18:54, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Same thing. "Alternate account" is just less offensive and more politically correct. By the way, I've figured it out. That "Lord of the Vulcans" was one of T'Shael's old signatures (remember that name that Katerenka used to be?), Lord Spongefrog,(I am the Czar of all Russias!) 19:34, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I got that... you spent your 6,200th edit saying on my talk page that you were using your 6,200th on me, even though we barely have any interaction... --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 21:30, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It just seems so totally bizarre though. Sure, have it as an addendum to a comment, but just on it's own, it looks weird and possibly slightly spammy. --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 22:16, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It was also the fact that... why me? As I said, the only real connection is through Spongefrog's talk page. Or was a semi-random user the point? --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 22:27, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Now the Wikipedian of the Day is something that is useful to recieve and works perfectly well on its own. What are the conditions for getting the award anyway? --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 23:42, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The new messages banner shows again. The conditions for getting that award are to:
Fight vandalism
Help many WikiProjects
Or if you are an admin, Block many vandals and disruptive users.
← How many WikiProjects is "many"? I'm active on WikiProject Xbox and WikiProject BioWare and, by natural extension of the two, WikiProject Video Games. --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 23:52, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Is your WOTD award like mine or is it diffrent?--ColdplayExpert 23:58, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like this:
Congratulations, (insert username here)! For your kindness to others, your hard work around the wiki, and for being a great user, you have been awarded the "Wikipedian of the Day" award for today, (insert date here)! Keep up the great work! Note: You could also recieve the "Wikipedian of the Week award for this week!
So it looks like mine? Maybe you should change the colors or something. (If you want to Im not forceing you to). Anyway I know that the forst person who gets it deserves it :) (let me guess, Jimmy Whales)--ColdplayExpert 00:02, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is where there is some discussion about name changing. Then, Coldplay Expert wanted me to know that he/she likes his/her new sig. I am ending it right now.
Ha, I heard that Newton preditced the end of the world in 2060 so I suggested that. Steve1337 is just boring, any username that has numbers in any random order is boreing. And check this out: Coldplay Expért | Talk 00:24, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
IT wont work, wait a sec.--ColdplayExpert 00:22, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
So which one do you like more, That or my current one? (If you choose the first one, I would have to ask Kat to use it as I dont want to upset her)--ColdplayExpert 00:26, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Change your sig in your preferences to: '''<span style="background:white; text-shadow:grey 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em">[[User:Coldplay Expert|<span style="color:SteelBlue;">Coldplay</span>]] [[User talk:Coldplay Expert|<span style="color:Crimson;">Expert</span>]] </span>''', which produces, ColdplayExpert.
Well I like the swirly coka cola looking version, perhaps you can do that with my current sig? (I also like Javert's style sig but with my colors like this:
Put shadows in your sig, By copying this: '''<span style="background:white; text-shadow:grey 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em">[[User:Coldplay Expert|<span style="color:SteelBlue;">Coldplay</span>]] [[User talk:Coldplay Expert|<span style="color:Crimson;">Expert</span>]] </span>''', which produces, ColdplayExpert. Shadows do look better. December21st2012Freak 01:31, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Eh....I think I will keep my regular sig. When Kat comes back form that wikibreak Im gona ask to use her old sig--ColdplayExpert 01:33, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just so you know, Ill reveal my gemder and alot (not too much) more (like my age, but you probably already know that) once I become an admin. Not that I would not tell you now but I just think that that would be the right time.--ColdplayExpert 02:28, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, last evening I created an account as part of the WP:NEWT project as noted in this week's Signpost. You were one of the people who posted to the account's user talk. The account created ten new articles about Antarctic moss. You can view my full report here. If you have any questions or concerns please discuss them at my user talk page, or at the project NEWT talk page. Best regards, Durova362
do you think that I should use my javertish signature? If so then once kat responds the desision will be permanate (aka ill use it untill she responds, maybe longer if she says I can)--ColdplayExpert 01:59, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe, and try to surprise Katerenka with your new sig. December21st2012Freak 02:00, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
of course ill suprise her but I need a definite yes or know first.--ColdplayExpert 02:01, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK then! (ill still keep my mainpage stuff the same as my now old sig will sill be used for holidays ect.)--Coldplay Expért | Talk 02:07, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Copy cat. Ill be useing my traditional colors though so goodbye green.--Coldplay Expért | Talk 02:21, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK now its finished. I pourposely put the let's infront of the talk. Its a line for the song Talk--Coldplay ExpértLet's talk 02:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey guys, word of advice: stop playing with signatures. Changing your signature very often, using different colors and such, then talking about it makes you guys look like immature 11 year olds (no offense). I know you both are trying to succeed on Wikipedia, and make a name for yourself, and playing with your signatures doesn't help. So, I just wanted to drop that bit of advice by. Cheers to you both! iMatthewtalk at 04:43, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Im not 11. And I was just asking for a second opinion. Sorry.--Coldplay ExpértLet's talk 13:57, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey I got a question. Acording to the discussion at Dylan's talk page. I should be adopted. What do you think?--Coldplay ExpértLet's talk 23:43, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Whats with you and your one word answers? They are so funny. Its just yes or no. Anyway thanks now I got to find a user that can teach me best.--Coldplay ExpértLet's talk 00:44, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I don't know you very well, but I am curious: what are your thoughts on the 2012 rumours regarding the fact that the film was released today? Scared yet? Dying to watch it frequently after this day? I am certainly impatient for watching this catastrophic spectacle! :-) Schfifty3 05:18, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I just read the plot and I can tell you now that it's the biggest hunk of garbage I've ever heard. The world is supposed to end in 2012, not become the scene for some ridiculous, ill-thought-out Hollywood disaster movie. If I had to choose between the two, it'd be the world ending. It's more interesting. --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 10:28, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well although I don't believe in this very dramatic phenomenon, I had a fair amount of energy to watch this film for the first time. It does have remarkable visual effects; those are probably the only interesting effect added to the disaster film. I still hope to watch this film and observe how it illustrates this meme. Schfifty3 05:29, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I just set MiszaBot III to archive after 15 days. I just archived the rest of my talk page. Décémbér21st2012Fréak | Talk 00:29, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
_at_Disney%27s_Animal_Kingdom_(16-01-2005).jpg)
