User talk:StalwartGrantist

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Brockhold (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

September 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at National Republican Party, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 16:57, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing[edit]

The majority of your edits are not improvements and are being reverted. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:35, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Multiple articles, you may be blocked from editing. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rastakhiz Party. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:28, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:Verifiability]], you must provide sourced when unsourced material is challenged by removing it from articles. Restoring disputed material without citations from WP:RS\reliable sources is considered to be disruptive editing and can lead t being blocked from editing. What you personally known, or what is "generally known" is irrelevant, sources must be provided. If the information is as widely known as you claim, then it should be extremely easy to find and post a source to ssupport it. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:28, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously, this also goes for all the other articles in which you added unsourced information. Those edits are now being reverted. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:30, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021[edit]

I reverted your change to the Know Nothing infobox because within the context of the 1850s the Know Nothings were an opponent of the Republican Party. If you want to compare current U.S. Republican Party ideology to the K-N's ideology, you can make that case in the Legacy section or another more appropriate place, but it doesn't belong in the infobox about the 1850s party. Carter (talk) 20:49, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Self sources[edit]

ulkuocaklari is sources from mhp, we can't do primary sources.Shadow4dark (talk) 15:02, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AA2 advisory[edit]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- LouisAragon (talk) 17:47, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

3RR[edit]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - LouisAragon (talk) 18:33, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:StalwartGrantist reported by User:LouisAragon (Result: ). Thank you. LouisAragon (talk) 18:43, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello StalwartGrantist. You've been warned for edit warring at Qajar Iran per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. You may be blocked if you revert the article again without getting a prior consensus for your change on the article talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:12, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@EdJohnston: They reverted once again without consensus (no edit summary either).[1] - LouisAragon (talk) 19:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You have continued the edit war at Qajar Iran after being warned per a complaint at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 20:06, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --HistoryofIran (talk) 16:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

United Arab States[edit]

I saw your edit regarding my mistakes in the map I made for the United Arab States and corrected them. I added it to the page again. Thank you for noticing. 180app (talk) 22:59, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yemeni–Adenese clan violence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North Yemen. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm FlightTime. Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Master of Reality even if you provide a/some source(s), you'll still need to start a discussion on the article talk page to allow editors who regular watch that page a chance to discuss the reliability of the source(s) you provided. One reason is, genre sources can easily be considered an opinion and not fact. Genre's are a touchy subject here on Wikipedia and without discussion/consensus, regardless of your source(s), your addition or removal will most likely be reverted. Your edit has been reverted and archived in the page history for now.

Unsourced genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive.

Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 09:34, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at 13 (Black Sabbath album), you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 09:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Seventh Star. - FlightTime (open channel) 09:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]