User talk:Sobresaliente

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:47, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Sobresaliente (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

original block message

Blocking administrator: not provided (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Accoutn blocked directly, therefore regular {{unblock}} template must be used, and besides you didn't give a reason. (not that I think it would have made a difference). — Daniel Case (talk) 15:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sobresaliente (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why do you have to block me? I have not done anything wrong in my edits, and still I got suspected for something I am not. I'm concerned with the articles about Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, and I feel that I can contribute greatly to make it a good article. I hope that this block issue will suffice. I don't deserve this.

Decline reason:

Block evasion is unacceptable so this account will remain blocked. —Travis ^talk 15:21, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The same reason your other accounts were blocked. Block evasion. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:19, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sobresaliente (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I possess ONLY one account at Wikipedia. I don't see why I get suspected for something I have NOT done. I didn't violate any rules. Please do justice, and don't single me out as a person who heed the rules of this encyclopedia. YOU HAVE TO JUDGE ME BY THE EDITS I HAVE MADE, AND NOT BY MERE PARANOIA AND SUSPICION.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified sockpuppet of User:Richard Relucio. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 17:49, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your inappropriate use of unblock-auto and all caps demand is very familiar. See WP:DUCK. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:52, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]