User talk:Slowmusketeer

Slowmusketeer, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Slowmusketeer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Daybreakers (novel) (November 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is based on one source only. Are there other sources that can be used as well to strengthen the draft?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Daybreakers (novel) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Daybreakers (novel), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 08:38, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Daybreakers (novel) (March 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Daybreakers (novel) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Daybreakers (novel), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 11:12, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Daybreakers (novel) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Daybreakers (novel), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:47, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Daybreakers (novel)[edit]

Hello, Slowmusketeer. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Daybreakers (novel), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 04:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your question to DGG and took a look at your draft, as I've written several articles on books. The problem with the draft, as I see it, is that it doesn't meet the criteria for notability (books). The only possibility for establishing notability for this book is #1 (The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself.) but I can't find any book reviews on that specific novel. All of the sourced content in the draft is about L'Amour and his books in general, not about The Daybreakers specifically. I'm afraid without at least two substantial reviews, you can't support individual notability for this one novel. (It's a shame, it's an excellent book.) Schazjmd (talk) 20:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Schazjmd, I'm just curious, how did Ferguson Rifle get published? It has no references at all. --Slowmusketeer (talk) 20:17, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You mean The Ferguson Rifle. Good question. That article was written in 2005, Wikipedia's much earlier years (think equivalent to Wild West days) before serious attention to verifiability and notability was paid. There are probably thousands of articles written back then that would not be accepted today. When you find one, you're welcome to nominate it for deletion (see WP:XFD) if you think it doesn't meet current standards. Schazjmd (talk) 20:24, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yes, that's what I meant. Well, dang. L'Amour was such a prolific and influential writer, and his Sackett series was so popular, I didn't think it would be this hard to get an article on one of these novels published here. Thanks. --Slowmusketeer (talk) 20:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Daybreakers (novel)[edit]

Hello, Slowmusketeer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Daybreakers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:44, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Daybreakers (novel) has been accepted[edit]

The Daybreakers (novel), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Redirect-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 06:45, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Audrey Moore (actress)[edit]

Hello! I've added the ^{[citation needed]} tag to the birthplace. Would you be able to add a citation (preferably in the article, but infobox is alright) to the article? Citing Instagram should be fine under these circumstances, as it's not an extraordinary claim. Thanks! Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 07:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, here is the Instagram post, can you add it? I'm afraid I'll mess it up. My skills are rusty. https://www.instagram.com/p/CnUyLVcPErl/