User talk:SliverWind

Please do not bully or harrass me. Thank you.

Welcome![edit]

Hello, SliverWind, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Jytdog (talk) 06:38, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discretionary sanctions[edit]

You should be aware of this...

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Jytdog (talk) 06:38, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war warning[edit]

I am sorry but you are off to a bad start. Please don't base edits on how you feel about stuff. Please.

Your recent editing history at Vitalism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 06:44, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware that discretionary sanctions exist. Think before you revert, and you could of prevented an edit war. I will be updating the talk page soon. --SliverWind (talk) 06:46, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't edit war - especially not unsourced stuff like this and this. That is not valid editing on anything, but definitely not something to do on a topic with discretionary sanctions, which calls for the highest standards of content (so use very strong sources, and summarize them very well) and behavior (so don't edit war to restore unsourced content that you cannot justify under any policy or guideline in the first place). Please edit wisely. Jytdog (talk) 07:30, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Britt Marie Hermes has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Britt Marie Hermes was changed by SliverWind (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858524 on 2017-03-29T07:14:01+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:14, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Make edits like this and this again without getting consensus and I will ask that you be topic banned. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:10, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —DoRD (talk) 20:28, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]