User talk:Sidowpknbkhihj

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Sidowpknbkhihj, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 14:41, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for advicing! I love Wikipedia!--Sidowpknbkhihj (talk) 14:43, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- Ahunt (talk) 14:44, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Air Canada Flight 018 Stowaway Incident[edit]

The article Air Canada Flight 018 Stowaway Incident has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Hardly noteworthy for a mention in Wikipedia and certainly not noteworthy for a stand-alone article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MilborneOne (talk) 23:36, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Air Canada Flight 018 Stowaway Incident for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Air Canada Flight 018 Stowaway Incident is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Canada Flight 018 Stowaway Incident until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MilborneOne (talk) 21:54, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have shored up the references in the article you have started Air Canada Flight 018 Stowaway Incident. You should consider voting on the AfD since you started the article.Lightburst (talk) 02:27, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of US Airways Flight 741 stowaway incident[edit]

The article US Airways Flight 741 stowaway incident has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not particularly noteworthy for a stand alone article, an entry at List of wheel-well stowaway flights is sufficient.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MilborneOne (talk) 09:20, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note:　The user, Sidowpknbkhihj, has been indefinitely blocked in Wikipedia Japanese Edition. The reason he/she was blocked is breaking Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines, such as WP:V, WP:NOT, WP:N, WP:POINT, WP:SOCK and WP:BP#Disruption. The detailed discussion log is here (written in Japanese). During the discussion, Sidowpknbkhihj declared to retire [1]. Below is his/her translated statement concerning the retirement.

I will leave Wikipedia. Many people agree to blocking me in the discussion, and I think I am not a preferable person for Wikipedia. Even I think that I will be blocked as a result of the discussion. Peoples said to me, “Sidowpknbkhihj rejected conversation”. But, I do not know what to reply. Therefore, I cannot be taking part in Wikipedia, as long as Wikipedia community requires conversations of me. The policy of Wikipedia is far from my understanding. I'm sorry, but I will leave Wikipedia. (Signature)

However, in the talk page, Sidowpknbkhihj still continues to blame peoples participated in the block discussion (log), and he/she is now editing other Wikipedias (English, Chinese and Korean edditions) with following his own rules. I hope that the information would help you.--エア修士 (talk) 14:37, 1 November 2019 (UTC) made some minor collections.--エア修士 (talk) 13:34, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of US Airways Flight 741 stowaway incident for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article US Airways Flight 741 stowaway incident is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/US Airways Flight 741 stowaway incident until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MilborneOne (talk) 16:32, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your own images[edit]

You have been replacing aircraft images in different articles with images of your own. We have Commons for hosting such images. Besides, Wikipedia is not the place to publicise your own work.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 19:43, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not change article images for your own, by all measns add images for subjects that could do with improvements but most of you changes have just replaced one image for one of your own. As what you are doing could be seen as promoting your own images then pleases ask at the article talk pages if you would like to change images. Some of your images have not been an improvement to the article. If you continue to spam your own images it may be seen as being disruptive, take care, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 20:18, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: In the end of his block discussion in Wikipedia Japanese Edition, Sidowpknbkhihj declared his policy of future action, as below.

It is sure that conversation and discussion are necessary in the real world. However, since we cannot see the face of people in the Internet (like Wikipedia), it should be difficult for us to talk to someone in the Internet (unlike the real-world’s dialogue). That is why I misunderstood the other Wikipedians to fighting with me, and I acted selfishly. As for the replacement of aircraft photos in the ja:A340 with ignoring the discussion, I think I would not be punished because there was no photo-selection policy. Here, I do apologize about it. Anyway, as I have no confidence to continue contributing in the Wikipedia rules, I think it is better not to participate in Wikipedia. Although Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, I should realize that some degree of personal liberty could be limited. In case of my editing other language’s Wikipedias, I will quit when I make some trouble with other person or community. To be honest, I think my policy above is so selfish (But, I continue editing other Wikipedias, now). That’s all. (Signature)
-- translated from [2]

If Sidowpknbkhihj were a person of his/her own words, Sidowpknbkhihj would quit Wikipedia English Edition ASAP. I also have additional information that Sidowpknbkhihj manipulates a lot of sock puppets. Here is a list of his potential sock puppets (written in Japanese), some of them have already been blocked. Please, note that these accounts can act as Sidowpknbkhihj’s sock puppet even in Wikipedia English Edition.--エア修士 (talk) 13:34, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I do not speak Japanese (I wish I could!), but thank you very much for your comment and for your time. Something was wrong with this user but I had no idea there were such a number of socks.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 22:51, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sidowpknbkhihj, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

~ Destroyeraa🌀 23:59, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of global ban proposal on your account (アカウントのグローバル禁止提案の通知)[edit]

This is a notification of global ban discussion per the global ban policy.

これは、グローバル禁止ポリシーに基づくグローバル禁止議論に関する通知です。

My regards, SMB9 9thx my edits 04:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]