User talk:Shewolfsiren

February 2020[edit]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the Willard (1971 film) plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 02:55, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Haunting (1999 film) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Haunting (1999 film) was changed by Shewolfsiren (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881021 on 2021-08-05T22:04:35+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:04, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shewolfsiren! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Village People that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Ghmyrtle (talk) 19:03, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dante's Peak have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dante's Peak was changed by Shewolfsiren (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.943064 on 2021-09-07T19:21:18+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:21, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to It's a Wonderful Life have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: It's a Wonderful Life was changed by Shewolfsiren (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961745 on 2021-12-13T00:53:15+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:53, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at It's a Wonderful Life, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. You have been warned repeatedly about adding too much detail to plot sections. Please study WP:FILMPLOT which sets an upper limit of 700 words for the plot section. Binksternet (talk) 01:14, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:KISS: Immortals[edit]

Hello, Shewolfsiren. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:KISS: Immortals, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:03, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:KISS: Immortals[edit]

Hello, Shewolfsiren. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "KISS: Immortals".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:29, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Eric Carr did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. "Adding a sentence" is an incomplete description for changes made to an article. Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 20:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Titanic (1997 film), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 02:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]