User talk:Sekyaw/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2

Replaceable fair use File:Dallon Weekes in 2015.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dallon Weekes in 2015.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 04:44, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

 Done --"Hey there! How's it goin'?" 21:25, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Dallon Weekes in 2015.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Dallon Weekes in 2015.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 21:06, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

 Done --"Hey there! How's it goin'?" 21:25, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

February 2016

Information icon Hello, I'm ScrapIronIV. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Alex Riley, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Scr★pIronIV 20:48, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Jacky Vincent

Hello, Could you please not change my picture again on the Jacky Vincent page. Thanks!! Jacky — Preceding unsigned comment added by Venomlove (talk • contribs) 23:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Sam Pepper, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 09:26, 10 March 2016 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello! Heytherehowsitgoin, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 09:26, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sam Pepper (2) (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment they left was:
...Unfortunately because I simply think this would noticeably be questioned for deletion and there's simply not enough solid coverage sources to suggest solidly satisfying a notable acceptable article. Sincerely,
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 04:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited BryanStars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Girls/Girls/Boys (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment they left was:
Basically the articles cited here all say the same thing, and use the same quotes from the musicians. It is promotional to push the names of the magazines to the text ("RS call it..." "Fuse said..."). State the facts, then give the reference, don't be promotional.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 01:19, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sam Pepper has been accepted

Sam Pepper (YouTube), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

333-blue 04:50, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Maryse Ouellet DDT

Hey there. Now its me guy TheBellaTwins user, quickly right her finishing move can be called as we know French Kiss yeah, however, on the article I put as reference there's called Frenh Kiss what is right the difference is that this one is performed in a different way that is why the Flowing DDT instead of a simple Snap DDT and I have put in on multiple DDT variants and the Shining Wizard thing I replaced the reference it says just kick but a shining wizard can be seen as a kick just there are some pages like mine with this edit I invite you to see the Melina one where her extreme makeover is a multiple facebuster variants to see how this works so you have an idea about, In fact what you think about it let me know it bye.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 11:05, April 10, 2016 (UTC)

Hello @TheBellaTwins1445: I understand what you are saying. I'll mention a few things about your argument.
  • Yes, a Shining Wizard can be a boot, and although the source did say boot, I left it as a "Knee strike, to the head of an opponent" due to my knowledge on Maryse. The thing about that is, a Shining Wizard is clearly described as such that "after stepping off the opponent's raised knee with one foot, the wrestler swings his other leg and strikes the opponent's head with either the side of his knee or his shin", to which is something Maryse does not do, which differentiates it from a Shining Wizard.
  • As for the DDT, you mention that you include Flowing DDT due it the difference of a simple Snap DDT. It is totally okay to include "multiple variations" onto finishers as the Melina Perez article does, although a simple kick wouldn't suffice the conclusion of two variations, as it is often a Snap DDT. The addition of Flowing DDT would not be appropriate as it is the norm rather than the rare. I will wait until we reach consensus before attempting to revert your recent revert to avoid edit warring. I will do so if no response has been given. Hope to hear back. Sekyaw (talk) 16:21, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Ok thanks for the feedback.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 1:58, April 10, 2016 (UTC)
      • Hey here back with a little prob on our discussion, so I'm not allowed to put the Flowing DDT just for being irrelevant in the variation of the move ?, and also I would like you to support me on my discussion with the HunteWinchester123 user discussion because although his edition would not be that kind of irrelevant he continues re-adding death sources on the article and some of them unreliable, he also deletes information without any explanation and finally he adds to many unnecessary images for the article as it has too much of them, so will you be kind of supporting me or will I be allowed to put the Flowing DDT on Maryse's article ?, I wait on your comments. Thanks .TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 3:56, April 11, 2016 (UTC)

Hi there @TheBellaTwins1445: Thanks for stopping by. I said that Flowing DDT should not be included due to her French Kiss being a Snap DDT. Although I said it before, I can further explain. It is totally okay to include "multiple variations" onto finishers in the wrestling section of a wrestler. Maryse performing a simple kick here and there before executing a Snap DDT wouldn't suffice the conclusion of two variations, as it is often a Snap DDT. The addition of Flowing DDT would not be appropriate as it is the norm rather than the rare.

As for the reported user, I might not be able to support you vocally, as I have already said my opinion and thoughts on the incident. But, I highly suggest that you provide proof on the incidents page the you reported him on. Copy and paste a link of a edit of his that you feel is disruptive and put it in brackets, like this, [link goes here]. That will create something like this, [1] . Hope this helps! Sekyaw (talk) 23:08, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Andy Biersack

Hey bud, you know Biersack got married right? Bvbfan101 (talk) 00:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

  • @Bvbfan101: I'm confused on why you're asking me this. I am aware that he did get married. Is there are reason you are asking me this question? Sekyaw (talk) 00:52, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

yeah ok first im sorry but yeah i noticed it wasnt up there yet and so yeah i thought id just ask make sure ya knew again sooooo sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bvbfan101 (talk • contribs) 02:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: We Don't Have To Dance (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Don't always uppercase the references.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
333-blue 14:06, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: We Don't Have To Dance has been accepted

We Don't Have To Dance, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

333-blue 22:38, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK for We Don't Have To Dance

On 1 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article We Don't Have To Dance, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "We Don't Have To Dance" by Andy Black was written with Fall Out Boy singer Patrick Stump? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/We Don't Have To Dance. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, We Don't Have To Dance), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 02:53, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Third opinion decline

I have removed your submission at WP:3O. After reviewing the linked Talk page, I note that there has not been a thorough discussion there. Please be aware that there must be significant discussion at the Talk page as a prerequisite for requesting a third opinion. If you feel that further discussion at the Talk page currently will not be productive, I would invite you to consider other forms of dispute resolution. Thank you for your understanding. DonIago (talk) 14:25, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

The article has been deleted

Is it good for you now? We are wondering what kinda Goat you are? 31.212.223.204 (talk) 13:58, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

@31.212.223.204: I'm sorry, but if you're talking about the recent deletion discussion on Millions (Gerard Way song), I can explain its deletion and trust me it's not cause I don't like it. I'm a huge Gerard Way fan and My Chemical Romance is definitely one of if not my favorite band, but there are reasons articles are here on Wikipedia and why some aren't. If a subject does not have notability, Wikipedia is NOT the place for it. In this case, "Millions" was not notable by the criteria of WP:NSONG. It's not notable by any means, it didn't chart on any major music chart and it wasn't heavily covered by the media. This also goes for Action Cat and Pinkish (Gerard Way song), which do not belong here. No Shows on the other hand, does indeed belong here, as it is notable and it charted a major music chart (Billboard). I hope this helps and please do not post on here to spread hate, I'm just doing what I'm supposed to do on this site. Sekyaw (talk) 14:33, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
What you supposed to do? Oh god, you should help making articles better instead of placing a template to delete them. MCR, Panic!, Paramore, Fall Out Boy and of course The Beatles, Michael Jackson... Go for it buddy and check their discographies. There you will find articles easily which are similar and can be deleted in your opinion because they didn't chart. And yes, probably all those singles/songs are going to be deleted if people follow every stupid single rule. Are you feeling excited now? If you like the guideline WP:NSONG so much then get tattoo with every single line on you. Find yourself here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bob_Bryar Oh no, you have Bob Bryar as a draft so you like to create this one. That is actually nice! Here we go Wikipedia:Notability (music). 2.162.90.7 (talk) 13:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
I am actually a big contributor to many MCR, Panic!, and Paramore articles. Probably won't get the tattoo, but that would be pretty funny! I would love to continue this conversation but I'm going to go and contribute to other articles while you can joke around here if you'd like. You can respond back if you want, but be aware that I won't. This was actually very funny and I hope you have a nice day. Cheers! (By the way, I saw the deleted Bob Bryar article and I feel that it was vandalized and tampered with way too much, so I'd like to recreate a much better one that really shows his notability.) Sekyaw (talk) 16:50, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Girls / Girls / Boys

On 8 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Girls / Girls / Boys, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the music video for "Girls / Girls / Boys" was inspired by D'Angelo's video for "Untitled (How Does It Feel)"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Girls / Girls / Boys. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Girls / Girls / Boys), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 13:07, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Panic article - touring members

Hi, I disagree with your opinion on putting touring members in that section as the vast majority of band pages (such as the My Chemical Romance one you've contributed to, and the Gerard one technically as that's also a solo project - just one with no name) do not have touring members listed in the introduction or info box, if anything the No Doubt article is an exception. I'm open to discussion on why you believe that band requires more than the official members list (which currently consists of one, so yes it's a solo project) unlike other band pages. Thanks! Nitromaster (talk) 09:42, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

@Nitromaster: Hey there. Thanks for coming to my talk page. In my opinion, I feel that the touring members should stay there rather than just Urie because Panic! at the Disco has always been represented and mentioned as a band, including Weekes, Harris, and Pawlovich. Even after the departure of the members, leaving Urie as the only remaining official member, they have still been mentioned as a band. I feel that they should be called a band rather than a solo project in the lead, and it would help readers show the touring members in the infobox and lead as well. If they shouldn't be included in the infobox (which is understandable), they should be included in the lead intro due to being a band somewhat similarly to the No Doubt article. Sekyaw (talk) 14:23, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Bob Bryar has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bob Bryar. Thanks! LaMona (talk) 15:33, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bob Bryar has been accepted

Bob Bryar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 23:47, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Green Day, did not appear constructive and has been or will be undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 23:18, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

[copied from opposing user's talk page]

Hey there. I noticed your revert on my edit on the order of band members. The order is meant to be by date joined and is indeed the correct way of doing it, despite the note you added. This was brought up a while back in a discussion, here, and was decided to order it by date joined, rather than instrumentation. Thanks. Sekyaw (talk) 00:18, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

A heads-up in the initial edit would have been better, Sekyaw. I was actually involved in that same discussion early on, but did not know that it had reached that conclusion. And I didn't actually say or indicate in any way that I added the note, just that I was following it. Anyway, thanks for letting me know. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 05:25, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
My apologies, 4TheWynne. I assumed you added the note from this section I noticed on your talk page, User talk:4TheWynne#Band members section, where you said you added a note on many pages. But, if it wasn't you who added it on this one or if that note was for some other situation, I'm sorry for assuming so. Have a nice day! Sekyaw (talk) 12:01, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

[end copy] Sekyaw (talk) 19:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Bob Bryar

On 8 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bob Bryar, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that My Chemical Romance drummer Bob Bryar suffered third-degree burns on his arms and legs during the filming of the music video for "Famous Last Words"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bob Bryar. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bob Bryar), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:05, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Social Outcasts

The back and forth edits recently and with 2 members being drafted to Raw and 1 being a "free agent" how can we be sure they have been disbanded?? Nothing has been confirmed and nothing has been said that Bo and Axel are still not going to continue together? Not wanting to argue by any means asking honestly to discuss. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 21:31, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Sorry WarMachineWildThing, I never noticed the back and forth edits. I saw the notes on the 2016 WWE Draft article stating their disbandment, so I assumed so and updated their page. You can go ahead and revert the edit if you'd like. But keep in mind of Slater's current status. If you were to put the team as active, I would put Slater as a former member due to the brand split (but that's just me). Thanks! Sekyaw (talk) 21:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Sounds like there is a lot of confusion on the matter that needs to have confirmation, I think it's best we leave it as is so as not to continue disrupting the article. I appreciate your willingness to discuss. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 21:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Your signature

I'm writing to inform you that I find your use of green and purple in your signature to be too close in resemblance to mine, therefore I urge you to change it immediately. HAHA just kidding. :D Have a great day. CrashUnderride 08:11, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 26 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Not sure if you noticed

Not sure if you noticed but the 3 IPs [here] have only contributed to that discussion. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 14:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Black Parade/Living With Ghosts

Hello! Your submission of The Black Parade/Living With Ghosts at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 18:27, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:VanossGaming logo 2015.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VanossGaming logo 2015.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

DYK for The Black Parade/Living With Ghosts

On 7 September 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Black Parade/Living With Ghosts, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an advance video release from The Black Parade/Living With Ghosts sparked rumors of a possible reunion tour of the American rock band My Chemical Romance? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Black Parade/Living With Ghosts. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Black Parade/Living With Ghosts), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

The Miz

Hello. The Hollywood A-Lister has been a section on The Miz's page since 2014 until changed by someone fidgeting on his page a few weeks ago, I was only changing it back. Thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhack15 (talk • contribs) 02:50, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KSI Keep Up 2015.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KSI Keep Up 2015.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sekyaw. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Opinion.........

Will you have a look at the history from this point on Sting to the last edit and tell me if I'm wrong. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 02:17, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

@WarMachineWildThing: Well, "pay-per-view" is already linked in the lead and the acronym is also given afterwards. Maybe I'm missing something, but from what I see, it makes sense to use the acronym because the full term is already used. Sekyaw (talk) 02:40, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Alright what about removing the wiki link to the list of Payperviews? Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 03:00, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
@WarMachineWildThing: I'm continuing the current discussion on Talk:Sting (wrestler). Please see my response there. Sekyaw (talk) 03:02, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Help me with 2 timeline

please redoing the timeline of Maylene and the Sons of Disaster and Vital Remains with all the session members in the all albums, with all the touring members and actually touring (see the official page facebook of the band) and the correct band list :) because my computer have a problems with this timeline — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.34.112.218 (talk) 22:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

I was flattered when you came to my talk page for help with timelines until I saw that you asked 14 other people lol. Nonetheless, I do want to say that we usually don't add touring or session members to band timelines unless they are notably vital to the band's lineup. Also, the timeline for the latter article seems fine (I don't know the band, but the timeline looks great). The first article does not have a timeline, so you can add one if you'd like. Sekyaw (talk) 00:08, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

The Shield

As you and I have been reverting alot of Unsourced info on the article I wanted you to know because of 2 members tag teaming for a couple matches IPs have taken to saying the shield reformed. There has been no announcement they are reforming the shield and during the 2 tag matches they were not anounced together. Just a heads up as I just reverted it back to your previous edit and I'm sure they will start hitting it again. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 04:47, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

@WarMachineWildThing: Nice job. It's good to know I wasn't the only one seeing it happening. Thanks for reverting the recent edits too. Sekyaw (talk) 22:56, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Gonna end up violating 3rr if I'm not careful trying to revert them all. The Shield hasn't reformed yet I don't get why people have to jump to conclusions because of 2 matches which they came out separately. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 23:18, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!!

Hello Sekyaw: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, all your help to improve and to expand Wikipedia. Cheers, -- Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 10:03, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Might wanna.......

You might wanna weigh in on this before mass changes are made to all Wrestling articles because of this users way of thinking. I see this causing more issues than we need. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 21:30, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sekyaw/Archive_1&oldid=1142544705"