User talk:Scootsalong
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aaron Barlow.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! France3470 (talk) 16:08, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aaron Barlow.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nouniquenames (talk) 02:49, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?[edit]
|
Hello! Scootsalong,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sarah (talk) 05:51, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aaron Barlow.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! OohBunnies! Leave a message 11:02, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Scootsalong. I hope you don't mind my comments. The trouble with your submission is that the references, although plentiful, do not discuss Aaron Barlow. They are almost entirely by Aaron Barlow discussing something else. Please try to find media references that discuss the subject himself in detail. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:31, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NtheP (talk) 14:31, 25 July 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Thanks, Anna. Still, I am a bit confused. I do see that, towards the end of my references, many are to articles by Barlow, but the majority of the references are to pieces about him, not by him. More than half of the references are to pieces about him. Should I get rid of the others, the references to his own articles, and only have those about him? Thanks, and I appreciate the help. Scootsalong (talk) 10:39, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Scootsalong. I would suggest moving references that are works by him to an External links section.
I'm having trouble finding the refs about him. I thought I only saw a couple. Could you please point out the best ones that actually discuss him? Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:20, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
- I have moved most of his articles that I mention to an external links section. Anna, perhaps I am beginning to understand what you mean: most of the references are reviews of his books or use him in talking about issues, etc. Only a few are biographies, and those tend to be short. The Sulzberger program page, for example, gives hardly a paragraph on him and the interview in the Chronicle of Higher Education doesn't say much about him personally at all. I was under the impression that emphasis should be on his work more than on his personal biography. I do know that he has been named as the Faculty Editor of the AAUP magazine Academe and that the magazine will be running a biographical article on him in an issue this fall. As I don't find much else that is clearly focused on his biography, should I wait until that comes out to complete this?
- Thanks!
- Scootsalong (talk) 14:13, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I don't think there are enough refs about him. Please read Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. As for the biographical article, that would count as a reference, but still may not be enough. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:33, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.
Click here to be taken to the survey site.
The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!
Happy editing,
Jonathan and Sarah, Teahouse hosts 02:21, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aaron Barlow, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aaron Barlow, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Aaron Barlow has been accepted[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
DGG ( talk ) 05:58, 27 October 2014 (UTC)