User talk:Scientist124

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Hello Scientist124. You used the {{Help me}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{Help me}} tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access to the channel.

Scientist124, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Scientist124! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Eagleash was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Seems like a duplicate or similar repeat of deleted item User:MadScientistX24/sandbox. More at User talk:MadScientistX24

Eagleash (talk) 09:44, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Misuse of multiple accounts[edit]

A report has been filed in respect of your potential account misuse at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MadScientistX24. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 10:10, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome[edit]

Thank you but I am not a sockpuppet of that user. @Eagleash:Scientist124 (talk) 10:18, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, the very similar username and hoax articles are just a terrible coincidence. The SPI check will absolve you then. Eagleash (talk) 11:08, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, sir[edit]

@Eagleash: Thank you for your time. My article was not a so called hoax, this event really happened. Now I do not need any disturbance now. I am not being rude sir but I like Wikipedia to be a friendly place and encyclopedia that anybody can edit. If you may, I might need some help from Theroadislong about the article.Scientist124 (talk) 11:16, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that happened; that's why all the references are deadlinks, malware or do not support the content. Stop, learn to edit properly before you are blocked for good. Eagleash (talk) 11:21, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Eagleash:You will be blocked more like for abusing multiple accounts, goodbye!Scientist124 (talk) 11:36, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Scientist124/sandbox[edit]

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at User:Scientist124/sandbox. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theroadislong (talk) 12:21, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:32, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]