User talk:Sayumichii

December 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Mashermat, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Marasmusine (talk) 15:28, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Puyo (mangaka)[edit]

I have nominated Puyo (mangaka), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puyo (mangaka). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Tyrenon (talk) 10:31, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of people from Doncaster, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of people from Doncaster was changed by Sayumichii (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964569 on 2011-09-20T10:42:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sarah Jessica Parker. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Vrenator (talk) 10:46, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Taylor Lautner, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Vrenator (talk) 10:48, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Taylor Lautner, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found here. Vrenator (talk) 10:49, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:07, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Koi Cupid[edit]

The article Koi Cupid has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced essay with no sources listed and no indications of significance. Created by currently blocked editor Special:Contributions/Sayumichii. Significant RS coverage cannot be found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:37, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]