User talk:SantiTNS

Most of the links in this page are both invalid and are used to bias the true history. Shall I remove the whole paragraph?SantiTNS (talk) 10:26, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Yes, you can remove the paragraphs which don't have any reliable source. I'd try to find the sources before removing the information from the article. If you're removing sourced information, you have to add an edit summary explaining why you're removing or you can explain on talk page. Fuortu (talk) 11:38, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to ETA (separatist group) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: ETA (separatist group) was changed by SantiTNS (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957898 on 2016-09-25T01:23:24+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:23, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Basque conflict. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Basque conflict was changed by SantiTNS (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956039 on 2016-09-25T09:29:54+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:29, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

SantiTNS, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi SantiTNS! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Doctree (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at ETA (separatist group).

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 22:52, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at ETA (separatist group) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Acroterion (talk) 22:53, 30 September 2016 (UTC)