User talk:Sani0346

December 2010[edit]

When adding links to material on an external site, as you did to File:Shrine of Abdul Qadir.jpg, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:

If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 18:40, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable source[edit]

Hello friend. Read WP:RS. Youtube can't be considered as a reliable source.--Aliwiki (talk) 00:04, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Sani0346 [edit]

Hi Sani0346. I noticed you created a Requests for Adminship page some time ago; I was wondering as to what the status of that request might be. I think it's fair to warn you that new users are rarely successful at RfA and that the Wikipedia editing community sets very high standards for editors running for adminship. That being said, I strongly urge you to read Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship, User:Davidwr/Administration is not for new users, and Wikipedia:Not now, and ask you to reconsider whether you really do wish to go through with your candidacy; please understand that you stand very little to no chance of passing RfA at this point and that you are strongly discouraged from running for adminship. If you are still intent on running for adminship with that request and are absolutely positive this is what you want, please do let me know; otherwise, I'll go ahead and delete the RfA page for you in about a week or so from today. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:02, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the page. Thanks for the response. Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:18, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

I see from your talk page that you have been warned and blocked over your removal of images. Please read WP:NOTCENSORED and discuss your concerns on the talk pages first. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 16:57, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 15:16, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul-Qadir Gilani[edit]

The image has been deleted as you copied it from http://www.alhidayah-international.com/publication/darsobayan/Ghose_e_Azam.html which give no indication that it was available for use on Wikipedia nor that you were able to release it under a {{cc-by-3.0}}. Also if you believe all these to be true then I suggest you make a report at WP:ANI. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 00:40, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It does not matter on how many websites that image can be found. The original needs to have been released under a copyright that complies with the Wikipedia:Image use policy. Just uploading an image and claiming that it is free is not good enough. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 14:23, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I remembered where I had seen a similar thing about the images needing sources. See Talk:Muhammad/images/Archive 18#Images violate WP:OR and WP:FRINGE on the Muhammad article and the section below it. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 16:10, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for resuming the disruptive behavior for which you were previously blocked and accusing other editors of vandalism etc. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 11:44, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Imam Hassan.JPG[edit]

The file File:Imam Hassan.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Data darbar 2.JPG[edit]

The file File:Data darbar 2.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Current and initial version are of very low resolution. Better alternatives available.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:15, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]