User talk:Royale.heart
Royale.heart, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]
|
Hi Royale.heart! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Welcome[edit]
|
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/TRICENTIS.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/TRICENTIS.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! QuantifiedElf (talk) 23:56, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile![edit]
|
Welcome to the Teahouse Badge |
| Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. | |
| Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing!
| |
Disambiguation link notification for June 26[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DJ JT, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page America (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Heart Your Smile.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:35, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:00, 6 July 2013 (UTC)Your submission at AfC Wardrobe Trends Fashion (WTF) (August 18)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wardrobe Trends Fashion (WTF).
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- You recently sent me an email. May I copy-and-paste it here so the reply makes sense to others who read it? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 11:45, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. Here is the email you sent me:
Thanx for reviewing this. I am very thankful to you. It was the first article I started on Wikipedia. That time I didn't know much about the notability criteria. Now I will try getting notability for it so that soon it gets published on Wikipedia. Also I would change the language to non promotional. I would request you to let me know how to get the orphan issue clearance. I would like to know that if there is any Wikipedia article with non working hyperlinks, can we beginners edit that and make it clean.
- Here is my reply:
- First, notability is not something Wikipedia editor "gets" for the subject of his article, it is something that either exists or it doesn't exist. If it exists, our job as editors is to document that notability using reliable sources independent of the subject, as described at Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Thanks for making the committment to remove promotional language and to make sure your submission has a neutral point of view as described in Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Don't worry about the article being an orphan, most new articles are. Once at least one article links to this article it will no longer be an orphan. Some articles, by their very nature, may be "orphans" for a long time. This is okay. I'm not sure what you mean by the last sentence, "articles with non working hyperlinks," but if you want to help "clean up" Wikipedia, I recommend using the "random article" link until you find one that has "cleanup templates" at the top that describe the problems in that article. Your first place to get help might be Help:Contents davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:37, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at AfC Marc Friedland (August 22)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marc Friedland.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
Disambiguation link notification for August 28[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stephen Monaco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kansas City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
August 2013[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vanna Bonta may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Volume 9, Issue 2.(1986)<ref>https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/display.cfm?News_ID=44609 Mars haiku]; printed on DVD and launched to planet Mars]</ref><ref>[https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/display.cfm?News_ID=44609 MAVEN Haiku Selected For
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:54, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 4[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Talib Kweli discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mr. E (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:45, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at AfC Brian Newman was accepted[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
WJ (talk) 08:46, 21 September 2013 (UTC)Your submission at AfC Marc Friedland was accepted[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Hasteur (talk) 18:56, 14 October 2013 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Luke Cooper[edit]
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Herald talk with me 16:26, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for November 29[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abiola Abrams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Cunningham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 9[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TRICENTIS, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:10, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Heart Your Smile, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TRICENTIS[edit]
Hello Royale.heart. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "TRICENTIS".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TRICENTIS}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Heart Your Smile[edit]
Hello Royale.heart. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Heart Your Smile".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Heart Your Smile}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —rybec 00:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello Rybec, Please delete. I give my concern.
Your submission at AfC Tyler Spalding was accepted[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
~KvnG 22:11, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wardrobe Trends Fashion (WTF), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:06, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 22[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nelson Nigel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mohawk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
The article Tyler Spalding has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:BIO. No substantial coverage in reliable sources and a search in factiva turned up nothing but brief mentions.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmartSE (talk) 15:06, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Blocked[edit]
{{unblock}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. SmartSE (talk) 15:15, 9 March 2014 (UTC)- Looking at your contributions it is obvious that you are a paid editor. Your cross over with other paid editors who have recently been blocked e.g. at Hyun Jin Moon makes it very likely that you are also a sockpuppet or meatpuppet. Regardless of that though, it seems as if promoting your clients is your primary purpose editing here and as such you should be blocked. SmartSE (talk) 15:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Royale.heart (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Mr Smartse. I have no clients whom I am promoting here. When I was editing this page first I went to free node help chat. I took permission to edit the pages. I have always consulted the admin in live help chat and followed their instructions. I always followed wikipedia guidelines. I was creating and editing articles to gain points of wikipedia. So whatever came to my way. I edited and created. I have no connection with the people whose articles I have created except one. I am creating articles cause I find them notable. Even I asked in the chat about the list of people whose article for creation is requested so that I can contribute to wikipedia. I love editing wikipedia for two reasons. I am a fan of it and I am good at html. Even now you give me any article to edit I will make a research and create article on it. So its pointless to say that I am a sock puppet. Therefore, I make a request to unblock me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Royale.heart (talk • contribs)
Decline reason:
Per above and below. — Daniel Case (talk) 23:38, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- You had not added the unblock request properly, so I have fixed this for you - another administrator will soon review it. As you will see below I have requested technical evidence to establish whether you can be linked to the other accounts. Regardless of that though, I find it inconceivable that you wrote Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wardrobe Trends Fashion (WTF) and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Asurvest (as well as the other articles) without being paid for it. It is the tone and poor sourcing of those articles that was the primary reason for blocking you and I stand by that decision. SmartSE (talk) 21:37, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- I can confirm SmartSE's suspicion of paid editing and sockpuppeting. This user is clearly not here to build an encyclopedia, but rather to deceive us and serve his clients' interests. Good block, if you ask me. ThemFromSpace 03:00, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
The article Luke Cooper has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- None of the sources demonstrate that WP:BIO is met. This is the best available, but that's not sufficient.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmartSE (talk) 15:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Asurvest (March 9)[edit]
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Asurvest.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Disregard the boilerplate text above: Even if you are unblocked, it would be best if neither YOU nor anyone closely associated with you or working at your request continues to edit this article for the reasons stated in the comments I added to the submission page. If the company meets Wikipedia's notability requirements, sooner or later someone with no connection to you will create a new draft or article about this company. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:41, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts[edit]
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TimeQueen32, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
SmartSE (talk) 20:28, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Luke Cooper for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luke Cooper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Cooper until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 17:59, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wardrobe Trends Fashion (WTF)[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wardrobe Trends Fashion (WTF), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 04:49, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Deletion of Brandon Mendelson[edit]
The article Brandon Mendelson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not notable enough. Fails WP:AUTHOR. WP:COI problem. Created by blocked ad-only user Talk:Royale.heart. Related to sockpuppet problem being cleaned up.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John Nagle (talk) 21:22, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Marc Friedland[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Marc Friedland, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 23:16, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Marc Friedland for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marc Friedland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Friedland until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:05, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Tyler Spalding for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tyler Spalding is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Spalding until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 20:14, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Brandon Mendelson for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brandon Mendelson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Mendelson (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:32, 11 March 2017 (UTC)