User talk:Rockinfilmmaker44

Welcome!

Hello, Rockinfilmmaker44, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Loremaster (talk) 04:44, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Conspiracy theory

Before you try to edit the Conspiracy theory article again, I encourage you to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's three core content policies: "Neutral point of view", "Verifiability", and "No original research" --Loremaster (talk) 04:43, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Conspiracy Theory Editing

I'm not entirely positive as to how the citation process works which is why I appeared to have no source, my apologies. I'm even going to edit the sentence. Here's the citation(page 15 he proposed banning them): Sunstein, Cass R. and Vermeule, Adrian, Conspiracy Theories (January 15, 2008). Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 08-03; U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 199; U of Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 387. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1084585 Here's the statement: "political leaders are often suspicious of negativer effects of conspiracy theories. Cass Sunstein, Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs to the United States government wrote an article concerning how they can be detrimental to a society and a government, he even proposed banning them to solve the problem."

```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rockinfilmmaker44 (talk • contribs) 04:59, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

I was already familiar with this essay. However, your interpretation of this essay and the first statement you wrote (which I deleted) was biased, unfair and inaccurate. The one above is better but still problematic. Therefore, I suggest you limit yourself to discussing changes you want to make to the article on the Talk:Conspiracy theory page first to get approval before making them. --Loremaster (talk) 05:11, 30 January 2011 (UTC)