User talk:Reviewer Number 45

October 1st, 2015[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I don't understand what was wrong with my user page. RXLV (talk to me or check my edits) 20:57, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was in no way related to Wikipedia. We're not a free web host. And that's not even considering the content itself. Huon (talk) 21:19, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 3rd, 2015[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Reviewer Number 45 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

JamesBWatson and Bbb23 are both wrong. The only reason that I have not been editing articles and "trolling" is because the Afd nomination of my first article so soon after I created it scared me away. I need to be given a chance. Per WP:DONTBITE, I was frightened by the fact that my work wasn't being respected. I do, however, agree to follow the terms and conditions that JamesBWatson listed at one of my other talk pages. RXLV (talk to me or check my edits) 12:31, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That offer was rescinded. After reviewing your edits, and your deleted edits, I concur that unblocking you would be a poor idea. Kuru (talk) 12:46, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.