User talk:Renamed user cwnbhrwsgf

National varieties of English

In a recent edit to the page Stormfront (website), you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to India, use Indian English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand or Ireland, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. -- dsprc ^[talk] 22:26, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Also: Blindly renaming titles used by up-stream sources is pretty daft as well. Don't do that. -- dsprc ^[talk] 22:27, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Stormfront

We refer to subjects in the present tense, even if defunct or discontinued. Stormfront still exists; thus we use "is". For more info, see: MOS:TENSE. -- dsprc ^[talk] 22:31 (UTC), 1 September 2017‎

Sean Burke

Thank you for reverting that IP. There seems to be a concentrated effort to remove this well sourced, but understandingly controversial, information that has actually caused the page to be protected before. Thanks for the quick revert and up the good work! HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 20:30, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Apologies, thanks for the correction

Sorry man, I was just adding some updates to critical reception to Scandals' Wikipedia entries. Sorry for the mix-up on the last page. Thanks for the correction!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.79.197.170 (talk) 13:14, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Kothlover. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:16, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. I will use it to the best of my abilities to stop as much Vandalism as I can. Kothlover (talk) 19:22, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to WP:STiki!

Hello, Kothlover, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 09:55, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Renamed user cwnbhrwsgf. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)