User talk:Razing-007

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for contributing edits that were made in good faith, but have been deemed not to contribute positively to the article. These edits have thus been reverted. Wikipedia's page on unacceptable additions may explain why. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

Some good links for newcomers are:

• Help contents – the main help page.
• Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to create your first article
• Tutorial
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out the Teahouse, ask the Help Desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Once again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 05:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Musunuri Nayakas, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:17, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Madurai Nayak dynasty, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 23:42, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of sourced content

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Vokkaliga, you may be blocked from editing. Reddy Vokkaliga, Gounder etc have been recognised as a subgroup of Vokkaligas by the Karnataka State Govt. Kindly read the references provided in the Vokkaliga page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:578C:B473:142F:6747:BE4A:F4D1 (talk) 12:07, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Hello, I'm Sharkslayer87. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Musunuri Nayakas have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Sharkslayer87 (talk) 05:23, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Sharkslayer87. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Pemmasani Nayaks have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Sharkslayer87 (talk) 05:24, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Your recent edits to Devanga could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Chariotrider555 (talk) 15:36, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Vishwakarma (caste). utcursch | talk 16:33, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Hello, I'm DaxServer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Telugu language have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. -- DaxServer (talk) 20:10, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pemmasani Nayaks, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 22:34, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Kannada, you may be blocked from editing. SUN EYE 1 09:03, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Hemareddy Mallamma, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- DaxServer (talk) 17:15, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 17:20, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Razing, you got a page full of warnings, and you never responded. You keep making these little edits claiming that you are right, but no one agrees with you--and you did that in a Featured Article too. There is plenty here already to make this an indefinite block, and if you return after this block runs out and do the same thing, it will be indefinite. Drmies (talk) 17:22, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Razing-007! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 17:00, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Actually, Razing-007, I'm looking over your contributions and having a hard time finding anything that is helpful or unreverted. I'm going to block you as not here to contribute to the encyclopedia.--RegentsPark (comment) 17:03, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  RegentsPark (comment) 17:03, 29 June 2021 (UTC)