User talk:Prywaciarz101

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Prywaciarz101, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 15:18, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Military cementery number 398 – Bieńczyce[edit]

The article Military cementery number 398 – Bieńczyce has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of any notability for this small, relatively short-lived and long-removed cemetery.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 10:46, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Military cementery number 398 – Bieńczyce for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Military cementery number 398 – Bieńczyce is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Military cementery number 398 – Bieńczyce until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 21:34, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Refidim[edit]

A tag has been placed on Battle of Refidim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Are Bible stories allowed?

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Clubjustin (talk) 13:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note, please use inline citations. It makes it much easier to move and transfer material.

The page Battle of Refidim will likely be deleted. A portion of the page could be merged into Refidim. It will need to have inline citations for proper verification. Please use at least one cite per paragraph with page numbers. -- Callinus (talk) 17:03, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Chaheel Riens. An edit that you recently made to Carrie Fisher seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Sorry, but Wikipedia is not the place to practice your English. Chaheel Riens (talk) 18:55, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Military cementery number 398 – Bieńczyce listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Military cementery number 398 – Bieńczyce. Since you had some involvement with the Military cementery number 398 – Bieńczyce redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —S Marshall T/C 20:48, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of Refidim[edit]

The article Battle of Refidim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Material is a pure bible extraction at present, with no secondary analysis present. Significant secondary coverage in reliable sources needs to be demonstrated to support the topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iskandar323 (talk) 10:51, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]