User talk:Professional astrologer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Professional astrologer! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - Eldereft (cont.) 20:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Please stop. To see why your comments to that talkpage are not considered appropriate for Wikipedia discussions, please read WP:TALK. Regards. - Eldereft (cont.) 20:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as List of pseudosciences are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Please, if you have an argument that is more than assertion, make it. But insulting other editors, making vague accusations, and being generally combative is not the appropriate course of actions for Wikipedia editors. ScienceApologist (talk) 20:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:List of pseudosciences for inappropriate discussions you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your "suggestion" that we remove astrology is a non-starter and is close enough to trolling that the general consensus of talkpage editors is to not accommodate this behavior any more. ScienceApologist (talk) 20:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have never edited Talk:List of pseudosciences scienceApologist[edit]

what can i answer to a false accusation? Professional astrologer (talk) 20:17, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:List of pseudosciences and pseudoscientific concepts is the intended link. - Eldereft (cont.) 20:21, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:List of pseudosciences and pseudoscientific concepts are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 20:30, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]