User talk:Pro Game Master87

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pro_Game_Master87.

Please click here to leave me a new message.

Hello, Pro Game Master87! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! -- The Hyb rid 09:00, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Image:WWEECWONS07.jpg[edit]

Sorry I put the speedy deletion tag on the image, I was meant to put it on something else!! Sorry again. Davnel03 11:12, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there[edit]

Hey - I'm just letting you know that an administrator, alphachimp, has deleted and restored your userpage in order to remove the personal details of minors that were on it (and remove them from the page history). It's generally not a good idea to divulge full names and dates of birth of children on your userpage because, on a site as popular as Wikipedia, lots of people could view your page and there is a small potential that this could have dangerous consequences. It's always better to be safe than sorry. Regards and sorry if this has caused you any inconvenience. Will (aka Wimt) 09:14, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay that's fine. I don't even care if the administrators take something off my user page. I'll just be waiting if my request for adminship is accepted or not. Pro Game Master87 22:47, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 222.152.194.29 lifted or expired. Request handled by: Netsnipe ► 02:42, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paddy Daly[edit]

Can I ask why you reverted the edit to this article please? It looks ok to me. Thanks. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 10:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have found out it was vandalism so I have reverted it Pro Game Master87 10:07, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon? Can you please explain what makes you think it was vandalism? One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 10:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here:

leading the unsuccessful attempt to destroy the Magazine Fort in the Phoenix Park. He was later wounded in the particularly vicious fighting near the Linenhall. He was subsequently

I have realized that it was unhelpful so I had no choice Pro Game Master87 10:10, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please assume good faith, even with anonymous editors. See number 10 on this site, there's a Magazine Fort in the Phoenix Park. See here for details on the Linenhall. Your claim of vandalism is incorrect, if you lack the knowledge to determine whether an edit is vandalism or not, assume good faith. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 10:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... alright I see sorry about it Pro Game Master87 10:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. There's plenty of edits that are obvious vandalism, and that one wasn't obvious so please don't bite anonymous editors. Plenty of people who have an interest in particular articles will have them watchlisted, and will sort out anything that needs knowledge of an article. Thanks. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 10:18, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Because almost every single unregistered users prevent vandalism here so I always look into their edits in the recent changes Pro Game Master87 10:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that, and it's a job that needs doing. But don't automatically think every edit is vandalism, there are many constructive IP editors, and that IP is a dynamic IP anyway so it's likely someone who has been editing for a while but with different IPs. Thanks. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 10:22, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I've gotta go so see ya. I'll reply back anytime in your talk page when I need anything to talk or whatever. Pro Game Master87 10:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Axe Ghost[edit]

Are you seriously asking me about something from October 2006 which you could have easily, and I do mean easily since this user has a grand total of 13 edits? It's right here. Calling other uses dufuses [sic] and dickheads because they disagree with his spelling of something is a personal attack.«»bd(^talk _stalk) 14:41, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So who is he referring to as a personal attack? Pro Game Master87 03:27, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That would be the person who made the edit. He may not have known who it was, but he was still singling someone out. If you want to reply, then I suggest emailing me, as I'm not on very often anymore. Peace, The Hybrid 04:12, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fansite[edit]

I removed the link because the current consensus among editors is to have only the top three fansites linked as the four or five next biggest don't come close to them. See discussion on the talk page and in talk archive 20. C omrade T ux 01:01, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Red Hot Chili Peppers logo[edit]

I've removed the logo. It wasn't criticised in the article (there's a criteria for an fair use image to be included in an article). Also, it made the name of the band much harder to read, in a place where it should be obvious what the band's name is. CloudNine 07:44, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:RHCPlogo.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:RHCPlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. CloudNine 07:58, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: A question about VP[edit]

Please be patient. You will be approved eventualy. ffm ✎talk 19:09, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your VandalProof Application[edit]

Dear Pro Game Master87,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that at this time you do not meet the minimum requirement of 250 edits to mainspace articles (see under main here). Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Daniel 06:54, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pro Game Master87 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sorry, that was my cousin, he was on my computer

Decline reason:

Not truly a reason for the issues raised in the block, but rather a standard excuse by many blocked users when caught vandalizing. I'm not saying I do not believe you, but rather I am taking the hard facts instead of unsubstantiated claims. — Jmlk 1 7 05:55, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As a matter of fact I am.[edit]

TheBlazikenMaster 12:59, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pro Game Master87 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

seriously, do I get unblocked, or what? It was my cousin who is pavator12. That is why our IP is the same. he visited my house and went onto wikipedia.

Decline reason:

You've already been declined, but I decline again for the same reasoning, which was quite well-put. Unfortunately, your cousin has gotten you booted from Wikipedia. Sorry. Again, please don't post further unblock requests.— Chaser - T 07:19, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Antiunblocktrolling.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:03, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]