User talk:PriyaRajasekar

Help me![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...How to create a page for living person

PriyaRajasekar (talk) 12:18, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PriyaRajasekar Please see WP:BLP and WP:YFA. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:21, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with the confirmation of my page which is submitted on 11 december 2018 and edited again on 17 december 2018 how long the review of the page will take place

PriyaRajasekar (talk) 04:33, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to have to assume you are asking about your unfinished draft at User:PriyaRajasekar/sandbox. Why do I say unfinished? It will likely not be accepted in its current state because it is written in a fashion that resembles a brochure for the school, so would be considered too promotional to be acceptable. There are also problems with referencing, since you have sections without footnotes regarding the source of the information. Finally, I see no sign that this draft was ever submitted for review, so - were it not for your asking here - it would have sat there in obscurity for a very long time.

Do you have a connection with this school? Your userpage does not have a declaration of a conflict of interest.

So how to proceed? I suggest you gather your notability references first, references which are independent of the school and provide in-depth coverage. So far, none of your reference meet this standard: they seem to consist of brief mentions, interviews of school staff, written by school staff, or routine press release information. Once you have several of these sources, you can begin to write a draft, summarizing just what those sources say about the school. Do not use promotional language. Do not express the aspirations or goals of the school as if Wikipedia thought they were facts.

The documents which seem like they would do you the most good at this point are

I also suggest that you start your new draft as a userspace draft. That way, your draft can have a useful title besides "sandbox". — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:35, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hi team,please help me with the confirmation of my page on "CADD centre" which is published on 4th April 2019 with some minor and till now i didn't get any message or notification regarding the status of the page.I request you to please speed up the review process and give the confirmation for the same.

PriyaRajasekar (talk) 05:13, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Helped. The draft is in your sandbox and is unsubmitted, that is why nothing has happened since 4 April. I will submit it on your behalf. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. Happy editing, Sam Sailor 07:26, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:CADD Centre, from its old location at User:PriyaRajasekar/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sam Sailor 07:27, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CADD Centre (April 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Poorly sourced, sounds like a corporate About page, and lo and behold several sentences are directly copy-pasted from https://www.caddcentre.com/caddAbout.php

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CADD Centre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:CADD Centre, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sam Sailor 07:30, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:CADD Centre[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:CADD Centre, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sam Sailor 07:30, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]