User talk:Pri2000

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pra2310, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Pra2310! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Bop34 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Sid95Q (talk) 20:24, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thankyou so much Pra2310 (talk) 01:33, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there[edit]

Hello Pra2310,
I understand that you are very passionate about editing Anupamaa and adding plot summaries and fixing stuff as it comes up. While all that is good, I need you to understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia – a summary of knowledge. Adding everyday events from the show is not what needs to be done here. For example, check out Balika Vadhu's plot – it is just a mere summary of the 8 years the show ran for.

You do need to understand that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Plot plays a trivial role in the overall encyclopedic value of the article. You should read MOS:PLOT and WP:PLOTSUM to understand and write better plot summaries.

In the message above, I have linked three different policies/guidelines in bold. Could you do us all a favour and give them a read? The way you are currently going, will definitely end up in a block – everyone here is a volunteer and patience runs out eventually. Best wishes! If you do have any further questions, please feel free to reply back here. 2405:201:4013:8128:F569:B633:BD68:D21B (talk) 15:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ok I'll read it. But can you please do me a favour? Can you please assist me in making new wiki articles. On which I'm currently working by collecting info from different mediums. You can see my projects on which I'm working on my user page. And one more thing can we add a parallel story section for parallel leads of story Samar, Nandini and Kinjal as their parts are very important in protagonist's life. Pra2310 (talk) 15:44, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, you should read WP:NACTOR before embarking on the new articles. Articles on actors are created only if the person meets the notability criteria. The guideline states, Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Anagha Bhosale has not had any significant roles outside Anupamaa, while Nidhi Shah has only played significant roles in two other shows - Kartik Purnima & Tu Aashiqui. I really doubt that either of them would qualify for standalone articles. 2405:201:4013:8128:F569:B633:BD68:D21B (talk) 16:58, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ok. But they both are talented like Anagha's male counterpart in the show, the parallel male lead Paras Kalnawat aka Samar. Both the actresses will reach the criteria soon. Thanks for informing about the same Pra2310 (talk) 02:13, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
sir you warned me against reverting. But there's a user named Vucein who always revert my edits. He uses words like Baa and Bapuji as nicknames. But they aren't nicknames. And there are many other things. Please review my last changes which I made before his revert and please warn him also against it Pra2310 (talk) 10:04, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
1) they both are talented Talent is not a criteria for notability here – many talented people do not have articles.
2) Vucien is not wrong here in reverting. We follow a certain set of style in writing known as the Manual of Style or MoS in short. MOS:NICKNAME is part of that guide on how nicknames of people should be written. However, you are correct about the "Baa"/"Baapuji" thing, and I will convey it to them as such.
3) "Love interest" is just an euphemism on "boyfriend"/"girlfriend" and therefore un-encyclopedic – per WP:EUPH such terms should not be used.
4) I would really suggest that you do not go about making anymore reverts while discussions are ongoing. Continuously reverting edits is known as edit warring and will get you blocked. Discussing and reaching a consensus is easy, you can see my talk page here (see the second section) for an example. 2405:201:4013:80F4:1DB:51CC:DE38:6D55 (talk) 13:22, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tellychakkar as a source[edit]

Hello again,
Please remove the Tellychakkar sources you have added to Anupamaa. Sources must be reliable as per the policy on WP:RS. Tellychakkar is not a reliable source and is even listed as a source that should not be used at WP:ICTFSOURCES. 2405:201:4013:802B:78FF:DB7F:87D5:906C (talk) 13:38, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sudhanshu Pandey article[edit]

@Pra2310, the article is at Draft:Sudhanshu Pandey as it's not ready for the main article space. Please improve the article there and work towards it being accepted by a reviewer. Note - I'm leaving you a response here as Talk page without a related article are routinely deleted. Ravensfire (talk) 17:34, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to publish this matter in Draft's talk page but it didn't published claiming this article has been deleted Pra2310 (talk) 18:13, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization in Wikipedia[edit]

Hey, you've added a lot of short descriptions to articles which is great, but Wikipedia follows normal capitalization rules, while you used capital letters for a lot of those descriptions. For example, you added "Indian Television Series" and it should have been "Indian television series". It would be greatly appreciated if you would go through the articles you've edits and update those descriptions, rather than rely on someone else to do the cleanup. Thanks. Ravensfire (talk) 13:48, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ok Pra2310 (talk) 13:49, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making those updates! Ravensfire (talk) 18:20, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mythological[edit]

Hi, please avoid using the term mythological when applied to a TV show based on religious beliefs as it is not neutral and causes ill will, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:41, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I'll rectify it Pra2310 (talk) 03:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pickles. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of programmes broadcast by StarPlus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nazar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I'll rectify it to tv series Nazar Pra2310 (talk) 06:54, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indent[edit]

Please WP:INDENT your message on talk pages. you can also check WP:AFDR. Venkat TL (talk) 11:42, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About your edit summaries[edit]

You've called me not confirmed and I'm spreading fake news in the edit summary of Sreemoyee. Btw I'm extended confirmed editor, and now I've provided source from Hindustan Times. Probably you aren't Bengali, so you can't read those sources. Also 19 December is after 8 days. As a result I've reverted your edits. Thank you. Happy editing! Shinnosuke15, 17:44, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Shinnosuke15:You're right. I'm not Bengali and can't understand this language because I'm a North Indian. However I read it after translating it using translation tool by Google. There the editor wasn't confirmed. Though HT is a confirmed source don't add ending date till last episode gets broadcast officially on Disney+ Hotstar and Star Jalsha both. I didn't call you not confirmed user. I called the journalist who provided that article on Google not confirmed. Pri2000 (talk) 19:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I have understood. Shinnosuke15, 01:56, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving and removal[edit]

Hey, just wanted to let you know that if your talk page gets too long for comfort, you can choose to archive its contents. Archiving is the preferred method for keeping your space clear, as opposed to deleting sections. However, to be clear, archiving is certainly preferred over deleting but is not mandatory—see WP:REMOVED—you can remove sections if that's what you wish to do. --2405:201:4013:8165:7C06:B1F8:460C:114 (talk) 13:57, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. Actually I found those discussions unnecessary that's why I deleted them. Will consider your advice in future Pri2000 (talk) 15:51, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All were not unnecessary.Princepratap1234 (talk) 16:33, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Princepratap1234:but still the talks related to some part was unnecessary. That's why I removed every stuff related to it Pri2000 (talk) 20:07, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semiprotection[edit]

I've semiprotected your talk page for a few days, due to obvious reasons. Ping me if you prefer not, or if it needs extended after the 3 days. I see some worthwhile IPs commenting here, so again, it is fine if you prefer not to have it protected. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:42, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dennis Brown: Thankyou so much sir for this help.Pri2000 (talk) 04:48, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indent[edit]

Please read Help:Talk pages#Indentation and correctly WP:INDENT your comments on Talk pages. Venkat TL (talk) 15:36, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pri2000 you are still not following INDENT. Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion Enable these options and use the reply link.
or
copy the number of colons in last comment and add one colon to it and include it before commenting your reply. The example is pretty straight forward. Venkat TL (talk) 12:11, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sir. I understood it. Now I'll use the same Pri2000 (talk) 12:52, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not feed the trolls[edit]

Please read Wikipedia:Deny recognition. twsabin 21:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Twsabin:Ok sir. But this person first harassed me on Wikimedia commons. Now here. By continuously harassing me. Also I doesn't know who he's. And now said I cheated him in 2020. Like seriously sir. I never indulged in any affairs. Neither in school nor in college now. My focus is my studies only. And he's blaming me for no reason. Who the hell he's to stalk me and made degratory remarks about me by living in an illusional world Pri2000 (talk) 21:16, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop feeding the trolls. Report them if necessary. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sir. He's continuously doing mental harrasment. You can understand what mental harrasment is. Till the time I open ANI to report his new message arrives and he character assassinated me Pri2000 (talk) 11:43, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my advice in the section "Prevent echo notifications" below. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sneha Jain, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Crime Patrol and Krishnadasi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot: ok sir. Sir an IP user is troubling me again and again after getting blocked through new IP addresses. Sir please help me[1] Pri2000 (talk) 09:56, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're messaging a bot. Please use WP:ANI instead if the problem persists. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:42, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prevent echo notifications[edit]

Hi Pri2000, please open your Special:GlobalPreferences page, open the "Notifications" tab, check "Select options below to be global", then remove all checkmarks from the "Mention" row and click the blue "Save" button at the bottom left. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:45, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Protection[edit]

I have semi-protected this page requiring autoconfirmed status for 1 year. Let me know if you want to unprotect. PhilKnight (talk) 08:38, 1 February 2022 (UTC) @PhilKnight: thankyou so much sir for this help. As a person with changing IPs was continuously harrassing and stalking me. That's why I requested semi-protection. Regards Pri2000Pri2000 (talk) 10:11, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editing by proxy[edit]

Hi - I read through the conversation you had with Princepratap1234 on your Commons discussion page. Please be advised that Princepratap1234 has been globally locked for cross wiki abuse and harassment of other editors. I note that you created Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagindas Khandwal College of Commerce and Economics yesterday; for reasons I am not able to divulge, I think it likely that you created that at Princetap's instigation. Please be aware that performing actions on Wikipedia on behalf of blocked or banned editors is known as WP:PROXYING, and it is not permitted; if you are suspected of editing on behalf of them again, your account will likely be indefinitely blocked. If you want my advice, I would urge you to block their e-mail again, and to avoid all contact with them. Best Girth Summit (blether) 06:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Girth Summit: sorry sir if it looked like a proxy. But I blocked 3 of his e-mail IDs. And now I want to increase my reach on Wikipedia that's why I keep visiting these type of pages. And whenever I found any page worthy for deletion nomination now I start noninating it. Now even I'm nominating schools and colleges from my city that lacks resourcesPri2000 (talk) 09:54, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I find it very difficult to believe that your decision to nominate that particular article, and this particular time, was coincidental. Be that as it may, provided that you now understand the rules around proxying, and are careful to avoid any further instances, all will be well. Best Girth Summit (blether) 10:04, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfD notes[edit]

Hi, you've voted twice at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Paras_Kalnawat. Could you convert the latest to say, "Comment" instead of "Keep"?

Another minor point is that when listing AfDs at deletion sorts, add them at the top like this, not the bottom. If you are going to be AfDing frequently, you can use WP:TWINKLE from a desktop computer, which makes nominations easy. For mobiles, you could try User:P.T.Đ/TwinkleMobile; but do exercise some care since it is easy to mis-click on mobiles and Twinkle is very powerful. hemantha (brief) 13:46, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the useful advice Pri2000 (talk) 13:57, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pri2000, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.  Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 10:43, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paras Kalnawat (February 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:13, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

Information icon Hi Pri2000! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Anupamaa several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Anupamaa, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. AAhap36 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@AAhap36 that's the same thing I'm trying to say. I'm here since several months. And that's the thing about which I warned you. You can't simply add or remove any section without proper discussion if reliable sources are available. Any section is removed without discussion only if no reliable sources are available Pri2000 (talk) 14:56, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm ManaliJain. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please read WP:CRYSTALBALL, dates are not definite until the event actually takes place. ManaliJain (talk) 17:25, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ManaliJain sorry Pri2000 (talk) 21:54, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon @Pri2000: You've done the same thing again. Have the episodes gone on-air yet? Just on the basis of OTT platforms where an episode has been premiered before the TV channel and that to for premium subscribers doesn't mean you'll start adding up the episode numbers on all articles. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, kindly follow the guidelines. ManaliJain (talk) 04:42, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. ManaliJain (talk) 04:58, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ManaliJain I did after when episodes get uploaded on Hotstar app. So this isn't no where against the rule to update episode counts after it gets uploaded on Hotstar app. Even ghkkpm have 7 days advance episode Pri2000 (talk) 09:02, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The shows are notable because those are telecast on StarPlus so we should upadate the episode count according to the starplus not Hotstar.Thanks. AAhap36 (talk • contribs) 10:16, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@AAhap36 please see section below. "We should wait" why should we wait when it is already published. Can you cite the rule or consensus discussion that says "We should wait". Venkat TL (talk) 11:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See Talk:Anupamaa/Archive 1#Updates based on OTT --Venkat TL (talk) 11:30, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@AAhap36 Contrary to what you said above, There is no such rule that " we should upadate the episode count according to the starplus not Hotstar." Please respond on the Talk:Anupamaa. section. Venkat TL (talk) 11:57, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A peace dove for you![edit]

Pardon me for making you bothered over the matter but I'm glad that it did got pointed out, coz what isn't worth knowing here?

Thanks, I appreciate your contributions!


ManaliJain (talk) 17:23, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ManaliJain no worries. Misunderstandings is a part of daily life. We both were at good terms since starting. Misunderstandings happened this time. Hoping for better understanding between us for future. Happy Editing Pri2000 (talk) 17:38, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Certainly! ManaliJain (talk) 17:47, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry from my side too. I am new here and only knew about WP: CRYSTAL.I am learning guidelines slowly but i learned something new today .Thanks 😊 AAhap36 (talk • contribs) 18:06, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@AAhap36, @ManaliJain, @Pri2000 I suggest that you all read the page Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset. There are many rules here, but those rules are the most important. You may know some of the points already. It will be a useful reminder. Cheers. Venkat TL (talk) 18:17, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@AAhap36 no worries. This experience even helped me to learn new things on Wikipedia. Cheers. Happy Editing Pri2000 (talk) 18:51, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Venkat TL thanking you as a fellow editor too for helping me out during this process and make me learn new things. Happy Editing Pri2000 (talk) 18:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Pri2000 you are welcome. Your talk page is on my watchlist. So I become aware when things start getting heated up here on this talk page. We are all humans, make mistake and keep learning. Remember to ping me in future if you need advice on complicated matters or disputes. You can WP:Archive the above thread or delete it if you wish. Since those warnings are due to misunderstanding I would suggest removing them. Venkat TL (talk) 19:02, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Filmography[edit]

Hii Pri2000! With regards to your recent edits on different pages of actors and actresses, I would really want you to have a look at WP:FILMOGRAPHY. Thanks, happy editing. ManaliJain (talk) 10:40, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ManaliJain I think you're talking with reference to recently launched Dharm Yoddha Garud's cast Faisal Khan, Toral Rasputra, Parul Chauhan, Angad Hasija and Ankit Raj. Please tell me if I did any mistake in updating filmography and adding references. Pri2000 (talk) 11:14, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the cast of this particular show and other actor's pages as well. References were alright since all of them were reliable sources but adding up trivial details isn't necessary plus it also doesn't pass filmography. ManaliJain (talk) 12:45, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@ManaliJain ok Pri2000 (talk) 12:50, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Plot[edit]

I will appreciate if you can consult endnotes etc. before embarking on reckless editing. Did you have any difficulty in understanding this note:

In India, reference to JNU has been changed to ANU following the directions of Central Board of Film Certification. In an interview with Lallantop on 16 March 2022, Vivek Agnihotri mentioned that the name of the university has been retained as JNU in the international print of the movie. [citations omitted]

? TrangaBellam (talk) 18:33, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TrangaBellam I never termed JNU as JNU. I just termed it ANU. Then about which edit you're talking about Pri2000 (talk) 18:45, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you term it as ANU despite our note? TrangaBellam (talk) 18:48, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@TrangaBellam oh sorry. I didn't realised this thing. I'll remove it Pri2000 (talk) 18:54, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Quick note: you need not address the replies at The Kashmir Files talkpage to me since I am not the arbiter of content for the article. That will need to be decided through discussion with fellow editors. One general note though: when in doubt (about, say, how we should refer a character as or which slogans to quote) follow the example of the best available sources since while we do allow use of primary sources (ie, the film itself) in the plot section, secondary sources can help guide what is worth retaining. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 19:56, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion Regarding Content[edit]

Hello Pri... The TRP ID session from My Edits were removed by you,I just want to ask How I can let that Edit be available on Wikipedia of Respective Shows?...Please Let Me know Rkanstws (talk) 10:36, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rkanstws please read the message on your talk page what I said because that section isn't added in wikipedia Pri2000 (talk) 10:38, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anupama: Namaste America has been accepted[edit]

Anupama: Namaste America, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 13:56, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Anupama: Namaste America[edit]

Hello, Pri2000,

Thank you for creating Anupama: Namaste America.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our Article for creation process and note that:

Please add a reception section with details of reviews of the film in reliable sources when available

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|C1K98V}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:32, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@C1K98V thanks. But the series launched yesterday so it may take some time for me to add reviews in reception section Pri2000 (talk) 09:48, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Woh Toh Hai Albelaa‎[edit]

Hello, I hope you're doing well. Rather than removing the table, can't we all together try to keep the plot section simple and understandable for readers within 500 characters. I'm aware it's a tv series not a web series. It might be on-air for 6 month or long. Think about it. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:18, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@C1K98V please read my edit summary. See the plot sections of several shows which not only have summarized plots but explains story well. If you want to create Episode table then make it in a separate article like Wagle Ki Duniya Nayi Peedhi Naye Kissey. And provide it's link in main article. I hope you'll understand what I'm trying to say Pri2000 (talk) 09:26, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't get you in what reference you're trying say. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:29, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@C1K98V the page has been deleted. But you should see Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah story arcs section once. Their every storyline is provided in tabular form instead of plot summary or edit summary. And if I'm not wrong then Yeh Hai Chahatein have same thing. As both shows have been running for 14 and 2.5 years respectively. So providing story arc summary instead of plot summary and episode summary is much better. Pri2000 (talk) 09:42, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I got it what you tried making me understand, nonetheless its not required here. It won't have such a long run, looking at the past of Star Bharat broadcast. Thanks, C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:51, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anupama: Namaste America[edit]

"always try to keep Vanraj's character in good light" is not how we write Wikipedia articles. You've been edit warring over this summary, but your version is full of grammatical mistakes. Drmies (talk) 14:03, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies I know it was a personal attack. But you should read line below. She's adding edit summary from original notable primary source Disney+ Hotstar app's short summary by openly violating copyright issues. And grammar is meant to be fixed not by removing necessary information. She could have fixed grammar. Even you also. Pri2000 (talk) 14:08, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but your summary is just too poorly written. If there is a copyvio, take it up in the relevant place, for instance by explaining it on the talk page or on Wikipedia talk:Copyrights. And you could have explained it on their talk page. So no, I cannot allow you to go on edit warring, or reinstating that content. Drmies (talk) 14:11, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Anupama: Namaste America. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 14:05, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies I know I did mistake. But the person is also violating copyright by copying content from Disney+ Hotstar app. Pri2000 (talk) 14:09, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your allegation of copyright infringement at Gud Se Meetha Ishq[edit]

Hi, Pri2000. Regarding Special:Diff/1087097695, could you please clarify where you're saying the episode summaries are taken from? Googling around, some do look like copyvios, but before I take any action I want to make sure I have the full picture. I've compared the summaries to those at [2] and I don't see overlap there. Are the summaries on the app different from those on the website? Thanks. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 01:58, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tamzin both are sane. The person took Disney+ Hotstar app's official website link to that show in Episodes in the similar way like Woh Toh Hai Albela. Pri2000 (talk) 02:52, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please link me to where you're saying those plot summaries are copied from? A specific link. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 02:54, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
First two links in this search are obvious mirrors. But the last one, a program guide, is possibly not. A number of other sentences are also exactly same (like "Kaju finds herself in a spot of bother" in the edit, "Kaju finds herself in deep trouble" in the EPG) appear to be similar to that EPG. Hemantha (talk) 03:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Hemantha: Yeah, I found a few other hits from googling, e.g. [3] for the summary starting "Things get intense when Fulji". But since Pri is alleging copyvio from a different source than either of these, I was hoping they could provide evidence for that, before I decide what to do about the copyvios. (Also, here's an archive of the page you linked, although it kinda got butchered.) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 03:47, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Tamzin [4] this is the official website link for this show on Disney+ Hotstar app. The copyvio happened from here Pri2000 (talk) 09:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Based on my own investigation, I did warn C1K for copyright infringement in these episode summaries, but I'm still not seeing it at that particular link? Could you point to which episode summaries you're saying are copyvios? -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 09:38, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paras Kalnawat (May 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RPSkokie were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RPSkokie (talk) 06:18, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@RPSkokie thanks. I wanted to know what more changes need to be done. That's why I resubmitted it Pri2000 (talk) 06:35, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Pri2000 Soucres are disguising themselves as news articles. To find out more, please visit WP:ADMASQ RPSkokie (talk) 06:42, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mahiraa Sharma[edit]

I think your {{db-a7}} is malformed. You might want to review WP:A7. It appears you have used the {{db-notability-notice}} (which goes on the page creator's user talk page.) and substituted it. Probably should use a {{db-person}}. Don't add the "subst:". Same for the other draft. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 08:34, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Adakiko OK. thanks. But Draft:Sudhanshu Pandey is advertisement. So can we use {{db-spam}} tag??? Pri2000 (talk) 08:38, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That would be even better! I tried to collapsed your db-spam template by prefacing with a {{tlx}}, but I see you beat me to it. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 08:43, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Adakiko Thankyou so much for your advice. Cheers! Happy Editing! Pri2000 (talk) 08:50, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please, please don't nominate articles for speedy deletion without fully understanding how speedy deletion works, as based on your edit summaries, you most certainly don't understand yet. Please don't make accusations of sockpuppetry without giving evidence. The article wasn't suitable for G11 either, (aka db-spam). Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 08:53, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mako001 I nominated it after seeing declining messages that read "it looks more like an advertisement ". And I accused that IP after checking it's geolocation and the language it used. These 2 people troubled me a lot in past on my talk page. So I requested semi protection. You can still see administrators removed several talk history on my talk page history. And Mahira Sharma just works in music videos. She even hasn't played a single pivotal role. Pri2000 (talk) 08:58, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, however, there is a difference between "declined because it is too much like an ad to publish" (declined AfC submission) and "this is total garbage, get rid of it now" (CSD G11) and the gap between the two is quite large. The two drafts may not meet G11, but they also aren't suitable for mainspace. However, drafts are not checked for notability or sanity and A7 (like any other "A" prefix CSD criteria) is only applicable in the article space, not in drafts. I'd recommend that you re-read the Speedy deletion page, as you seem to have missed some critical points the first time around. I made some similar mistakes early on as well, see how many of the first few articles I nominated for speedy deletion were declined. If the drafts aren't edited for 6 months, they will be eligible for speedy deletion that way anyway, so it's better to leave them be. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 09:12, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mako001 okay. Thanks for the suggestion. Will keep this thing in mind in future. Happy Editing! Pri2000 (talk) 09:15, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please leave the Draft's for the WP:AfC reviewers. Thanks. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:19, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Ah yes, I probably should have specified that as well.
    Even rejected drafts usually just get left to die of natural causes. CSD tagging is a relatively difficult task, and needs more experience than it can at first appear to.
    You seem to have got rather a lot of rubbish thrown your way. Feel free to report it to WP:AIV if it gets too nasty, or if you aren't sure if AIV would be appropriate, tell an admin or another user you are familiar with, and who understands the background. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 09:48, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pri2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand why Tamzin blocked me on the grounds of disruptive editing. Atleast clarify the reason where I did it so that I can rectify my mistakes in future. Even no warning was given to me. Last edit which I did was at Rupali Ganguly's article where an IP added an pseudonym of Dada Saheb Phalke Award to her current role Anupamaa in Anupamaa without providing a reliable source. And before that I added Citations to Shivangi Joshi's articles. Atleast please clarify the reason behind it. Or show where I did it.

Decline reason:

Pro forma decline since the account was not blocked. Probably an autoblock that has now been resolved. Abecedare (talk) 23:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(talk page stalker) Pri2000, your account is not blocked by Tamzin or any other admin. I am guessing that any block notice you are seeing is related to an Wikipedia:Autoblock. Pinging Tamzin who, as the "blocking admin" and an SPI clerk, may be better equipped than I to resolve this. Abecedare (talk) 22:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Abecedare: which means I'm not at all blocked and have my editing privileges??? As I never edit from any IP address since the time I made my Wikipedia account in June 2021 Pri2000 (talk) 22:31, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pri2000, see the instructions below. Abecedare (talk) 22:42, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clearing an autoblock

Due to the nature of the block applied, we need additional information before we can decide whether to unblock you. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. Without further details, there is nothing further we can do to review or lift your block. Please follow these instructions:

  1. If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.
    Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are.
    If it isn't, try bypassing your web browser's cache.
  2. Try to edit the Sandbox.
    If you are able to edit the sandbox, you are not blocked from editing. Either the autoblock on your IP address has already expired, or you weren't blocked in the first place. Either way, you can resume editing.
  3. If you are still blocked, follow the directions below:
    1. Copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the "Unblock request" section.
    2. Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page, and click save.
      If you cannot edit your own talk page, use the Unblock Ticket Request System to make your request.
Abecedare (talk) 22:42, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Abecedare: thankyou so much. But I recently edited Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai's cast section and this page is extended confirmed User protected for indefinite period. So, can it be possible that it was just an accidental message which displayed on my Wikipedia App screen???? Pri2000 (talk) 22:53, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Possible.Or, your IP changed in the meantime. In any case, since you can edit again, lets not look the gift horse in the mouth. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 23:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Abecedare Thankyou so much! Cheers!Happy Editing! Pri2000 (talk) 23:04, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi Pri2000. Glad this got sorted out. Just looking into this to make sure it's not an issue with MediaWiki: What page were you editing when you saw this message? And did it say anything other than "disruptive editing" and my name? -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 00:06, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @@Tamzin no. It just displayed "disruptive editing" and block message. Last page I edited before this message was of Rupali Ganguly where I removed a pseudonym unnotable unsourced form of Dada Saheb Phalke Award added by an IP Pri2000 (talk) 00:33, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    And what page were you editing when that message came up? Block messages only come up when you try to edit or use a special page. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 02:12, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Tamzin no. It just displayed suddenly when I opened the app Pri2000 (talk) 05:01, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Avoiding an edit war at Anupamaa[edit]

Hi Pri2000, thanks for your AIV report regarding OCDD. You might have reverted a sockpuppet of AAhap36, which would be fine then. I lack evidence, though; it's just that AAhap36 had a very similar edit war with you on the same page before. If you have more specific evidence, please file a report at WP:SPI.

Please note though, that normally, this message here would be a block notification. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:38, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree I guess he's sock of Avish773. He also do such edits on Anupamaa by going against consensus of talk page. I warned him several times. But he doesn't answer to single warning. Even several other editors warned him but he doesn't reply to them also. Similarly this editor do same thing by going against consensus of talk page and doesn't reply to any message Still I'll search for mentioned user and will provide evidence Pri2000 (talk) 12:45, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@ToBeFree I can provide you evidence that he's Avish773. [5][6][7][8] Pri2000 (talk) 12:51, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'd prefer the experienced people at WP:SPI to perform the investigation; please provide the evidence there instead of here. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:55, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@ToBeFree okay Pri2000 (talk) 13:02, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@ToBeFree I've filed a report by providing evidence. You can check it and comment over it. Pri2000 (talk) 13:40, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links[edit]

Information icon Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. ManaliJain (talk) 03:57, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Kindly note that in line with WP:ELNO, no social networking site except for a link to subject's official page should be used. Hence, an official verified social media account can be added as per WP:ELOFFICIAL. ManaliJain (talk) 03:58, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ManaliJain I added the official instagram handles. Pri2000 (talk) 05:16, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well maybe, but they are not verified, so how could we rely on them if they are official? Read WP:EXT, WP:ELNO, WP:NOSOCIAL, WP:ELOFFICIAL assiduously. ManaliJain (talk) 05:25, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@ManaliJain they are reliable because official instagram handles of channels on which show airs and even producers official instagram handle follows these people. Like Star Plus, Rajan Shahi and Director's Kut Productions follows all those accounts of Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai and Anupamaa cast. Similarly official instagram handle of Sony SAB and TMKOC follows all actors of TMKOC. Pri2000 (talk) 05:33, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No one would search who follows whom to understand whether the account is official or not, only the verified badge i.e. blue check mark would help do that, otherwise the non-verified ones would just look advertisement or promotion. That's not conventional and I don't believe Wikipedia works that way. Read WP:VERIFY, WP:VERIFYOR. I request you to follow the guidelines rather than personal beliefs/analysis. I hope this has become clear. ManaliJain (talk) 05:46, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


A barnstar for you![edit]

The Indian Television Barnstar
For your efforts to maintain and improve articles related to Indian television. You have been persistent and thorough with your work, and your contributions are greatly appreciated. — The Most Comfortable Chair 05:48, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@The Most Comfortable Chair Thankyou so much Pri2000 (talk) 09:40, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Avoid overlinking[edit]

Please read MOS:OVERLINK. Linking terms irrelevant to the context in the article should be avoided, including locations, religions, languages, common occupations, everyday words, etc. ManaliJain (talk) 11:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ManaliJain okay. Pri2000 (talk) 11:50, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Basic mistakes[edit]

Hi Pri2000. No doubt you're improving and doing pretty good recently, but I just wanted to kindly request you to please keep a check on your edits before publishing them. Basic mistakes including grammar, punctuation, vocabulary and other structures of the language should be avoided as much as possible. If you want, you can even use your sandbox to test or experiment. Thanks, happy editing! ManaliJain (talk) 17:17, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ManaliJain Thankyou so much for suggesting this. Pri2000 (talk) 00:31, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful[edit]

Please be careful while removing content or sources. In these past few days, you've been making similar mistakes when removing sources like Deccan Chronicle, Filmfare, IB Times, etc. If in doubt, check if the publisher is notable or not, and if non-notable then the same would be non-reliable and hence you can go ahead removing the same. You can also refer WP:ICTFSOURCES and WP:RSP for detailed information on reliable and independent sources. ManaliJain (talk) 15:58, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ManaliJain thanks for pointing out my mistake Pri2000 (talk) 16:01, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed template was already there [9]. You have more than 7000 edits still edit like this.The Chaos of Stars (talk) 17:24, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ghum hai kisikey pyaar meiin[edit]

Please edit the plot summary for this show since you are the one who frequently edit the article and you seem to know more about it.PLEASE Kutlo2022 (talk) 06:07, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kutlo2022 I'll try to condense it Pri2000 (talk) 06:15, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok,thank you Kutlo2022 (talk) 06:21, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey[edit]

This is regarding what you said in a few of your recent edit summaries and what you've been following [10] [11]. Please note that there's no such old or new pattern to be followed while writing a character's name. While the nickname can be and is written using double inverted commas but using the term née for a married woman's maiden name isn't wrong or unconstructive. Thanks, ManaliJain (talk) 07:28, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ManaliJain Thankyou so much. That's the reason I trust you the most among the editors with whom I've interacted till now. Pri2000 (talk) 10:03, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ravivaar With Star Parivaar[edit]

Hey, the article Ravivaar with star Parivaar is moved to draftspace for additional citations, i have added as much references as possible and submitted for review. Is there any way by which review of draft can be done quicker, considering the article is of an on air show. Imsaneikigai (talk) 11:13, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Imsaneikigai actually I'm clueless about it. As I earlier made draft for Anupama: Namaste America and submitted it and it got approved as soon as it's episode 1 arrived on Disney+ Hotstar. I think you should consult more senior editors. Pri2000 (talk) 11:19, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Ok thanks Imsaneikigai (talk) 13:23, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jhalak dikhhla jaa episodes count[edit]

Hey pls check what should be episode count because i added number of episodes in series overview tab which equals 248 (including today episode). Imsaneikigai (talk) 13:46, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Imsaneikigai Even I updated it after checking it both over it's episode count till 3 September 2022 on both series overview as well as in list of longest-running Indian television series Hindi fiction genre which was equals to 243 before last week's telecast. I'm providing a link to my those edits for the same [12] Pri2000 (talk) 14:38, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

== Nomination of Ravivaar With Star Parivaar for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ravivaar With Star Parivaar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravivaar With Star Parivaar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Imsaneikigai (talk) 13:56, 21 September 2022 (UTC) ==[reply]

Pls provide your valuable opinion Imsaneikigai (talk) 13:56, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Savi Thakur (September 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 14:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Episode count[edit]

Hello, I hope you're doing well. I don't know if you check the edit timing or not, I assume you don't, but I would suggest you to stop adding wrong edit summaries. If you have any problem with my edits related to the episode count, you can go ahead and start a RFC to reach a consensus that all editor should update the episode count once the episode premiered on TV not on OTT. That would be more fair. Thanks, stay safe C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 00:51, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@C1K98V I added those edits because all ott apps upload their brand new episodes after 06:00AM IST/00:30 UTC. And I saw that editors publish episode counts before this time stamp. That's why I said the same in edit summaries. Pri2000 (talk) 01:26, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Going by the technicality IST, Zee5 upload around 5:30 am, Hotstar, Voot uploads after/or 6 am, SonyLiv upload around as episode going on-air on tv. In these case timestamp was quite clear, you can have a look and it's not like first or second instance I have seen your such edit summaries. Their are many other ways to deal with it, RFC, after episode on-air on television where you can propose or mention editors to update episode after such intervals. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 01:42, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Sid95Q. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Please read WP:GALLERY and Wikipedia:Fancruft Sid95Q (talk) 07:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apostrophes[edit]

On September 27 in the Jhalak Dikhhla Jaa (season 10) article you added "it's" as if it were possessive. The possessive form of "it" is "its", not "it's". Jellysandwich0 (talk) 16:05, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 16[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jhalak Dikhhla Jaa (season 10), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Classical dance.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot thankyou so much for pointing this out. Now I've fixed it Pri2000 (talk) 09:08, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:In the news[edit]

Hello @Pri2000 Merry Christmas. I hope you're doing well. Can you please have a look at Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates#RD:_Tunisha_Sharma and support if you feel it should be "In The News" section/first page of Wikipedia. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 00:24, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@C1K98V Sure. And Merry Christmas to you too. Pri2000 (talk) 09:02, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Baba: Dastaan-E-Kabul[edit]

Hi @Pri2000, I hope you're doing well. I would like to invite you to participate in the move discussion and vouch your views and suggestions. Thank for your consideration C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 14:03, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@C1K98V thanks for inviting me to that move request. I casted my vote there. Pri2000 (talk) 15:47, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the quick response. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 15:54, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Mein[edit]

Hey Pri2000, since you edit indian television articles frequently, can you please update Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Mein plot titles, if possible. Thanks. Imsaneikigai (talk) 16:49, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Imsaneikigai I haven't followed that show's article since months. I'll try my best if I get any update related to it's plot. Pri2000 (talk) 17:36, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Savi Thakur[edit]

Information icon Hello, Pri2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Savi Thakur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Important note about reporting users to an admin noticeboard[edit]

Next time you make a report of a user on an admin noticeboard, please make sure to leave a notification of discussion message (e.g. subst:ANI-notice for ANI) on the talk pages of users that you are discussing there, as it says on the header at the top of the noticeboard. I've done that for you. Thanks. AP 499D25 (talk) 12:32, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AP 499D25 thanks Pri2000 (talk) 15:30, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hum Rahe Na Rahe Hum[edit]

Hi @Pri2000, I hope you're doing well. I would like to invite you to participate in the move discussion and vouch your views and suggestions. Thank for your consideration C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:56, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@C1K98V okay Pri2000 (talk) 19:24, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merger of List of programmes broadcast by Dangal TV[edit]

Hi, I hope you're doing well. I would like to invite you to participate in the merge discussion and vouch your views and suggestions. Thank for your consideration, have a great day! Imsaneikigai (talk) 12:50, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Baal Veer[edit]

I would like to invite you to participate in the move discussion and vouch your views and suggestions. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 15:44, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Savi Thakur[edit]

Hello, Pri2000. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Savi Thakur".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:57, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to "Web Series"[edit]

Hello, I came across one of your changes which redirected Hostages (Indian TV series) to Hostages (Indian Web series). Despite the show being released exclusively on a web medium, it is still a TV show/series, as that refers to the format of the work (as opposed to a single-stretch medium such as a film or an audio medium such as a song). That is, all web series are TV shows/series, as they're meant to be consumed on a TV and they're in a series format.

Moreover, the established convention on WP is the article title template suffix (TV series) whenever disambiguating amongst other art works / articles and (<nationality> TV series) whenever disambiguating among TV series of the same name from multiple nations. See Aarya (TV series) and House of Cards (American TV series) as examples of each, respectively. Please keep this in mind in your future edits. Cheers. Getsnoopy (talk) 02:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please participate in the deletion discussion[edit]

Hi, I hope you're doing well. I would like to invite you to participate in the deletion discussion of article Samarth Jurel at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samarth Jurel and vouch your views and suggestions. Thank you. Imsaneikigai (talk) 09:28, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Imsaneikigai will give my opinion for sure Pri2000 (talk) 09:30, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, please vote in this AFD too Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krishna Kaul (actor) (2nd nomination) Thankyou. Imsaneikigai (talk) 12:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Imsaneikigai sure Pri2000 (talk) 14:07, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help Please[edit]

Hey @Pri2000, I am so sorry to disturb you again but i need your help. My article Chashni (TV series) is nominated for deletion, please help me save the article by voting at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chashni (TV series). Thankyou so much Imsaneikigai (talk) 16:55, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Imsaneikigai I have casted my vote Pri2000 (talk) 18:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pri2000 Thankyou so much for your never ending and continued support. Imsaneikigai (talk) 18:09, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pri2000&oldid=1222750234"