Hello, Pozytyv, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like D-Dojo, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! iBentalk/contribsIf you reply here, please place a talkback notification on my page. 18:51, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. iBentalk/contribsIf you reply here, please place a talkback notification on my page. 18:51, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominated Roozz, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roozz. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ThemFromSpace 20:43, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominated BlockMaster, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlockMaster. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ThemFromSpace 15:26, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominated SafeStick, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SafeStick. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ThemFromSpace 15:33, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ThemFromSpace 15:35, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from SafeStick. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Etrigan (talk) 16:27, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominated SafeConsole, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SafeConsole. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ThemFromSpace 02:08, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Pozytyv. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page. Message added 21:47, 9 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for February 10[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chris Kacher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portfolio management (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for October 2[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Boksburg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telecom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:27, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
hello, I don't know if you can help me. I am trying to create a page for Ronnie Apteker, the man who founded Internet Solutions. The trouble is Wikipedia thinks there already is a Ronnie Apteker page, which is merely a redirect to Internet Solutions. So it won't let me create Ronnie Apteker. Would you know of a way around this, removing the redirect page or something. Thank you
picknick99
Hi, it looks like it existed and was changed to simple redirect page by User:SwisterTwister on 1 Nov, see history. I also see it was already nominated for deletion, but the result was to keep, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronnie Apteker. So SwisterTwister is probably not right when saying "Nothing to suggest independent notability or better improvement, was going to AfD but this seems obvious". I suggest you to talk to SwisterTwister explaining this and saying that you can further develop an article with properly sourced material. you can also prepare your developments, then revert his/her edit and quickly add your new Material, saying in the edit summary that the subject is notable enough.. with or without talking to SwisterTwister afterwards.. this is what I'd do in this situation.. Good luck! --Pozytyv (talk) 17:13, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If he is solidly notable for an article, yes. To be honest, the AfD consensus was not entirely clear (and from 2010 for that matter) but rathering than making a new one, it simply seemed he was best known and connected to that company. SwisterTwistertalk 18:09, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Meschino until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Delta13C (talk) 02:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:FreeCast Inc.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Pozytyv. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Disambiguation link notification for March 15[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jonathan Moffett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fusion. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No real in-depth coverage as required for WP:CORP notability guideline. Just routine funding announcements (VerticalNews), directory listing (Business Week), routine officer bio (Business Week) and passing mentions.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Orphaned non-free image File:FIBO Group logo.png[edit]
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:FIBO Group logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Spotware Systems, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 19:58, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spotware Systems until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 20:51, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Conflict of interest/paid editing in Wikipedia[edit]
Hi Pozytyv. I work on conflict of interest issues here in Wikipedia, along with my regular editing. Many of your edits to date are about software companies, products, or people (often multiple, related articles) - an area where we get a lot of paid editing, and many of your articles have been deleted due to lack of reliable sources about them; this too is a hallmark of paid editing. I'm giving you notice of our Conflict of Interest guideline and Terms of Use, and will have some comments and requests for you below.
Hello, Pozytyv. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.
Wikipedia is a widely-used reference work and managing conflict of interest is essential for ensuring the integrity of Wikipedia and retaining the public's trust in it. As in academia, COI is managed here in two steps - disclosure and a form of peer review. Please note that there is no bar to being part of the Wikipedia community if you want to be involved in articles where you have a conflict of interest; there are just some things we ask you to do (and if you are paid, some things you need to do).
Disclosure is the most important, and first, step. Would you please disclose if you have received or expect to receive compensation for any edits you have made in Wikipedia? Would you also state whether you have edited under other accounts here?
I apologize for the questions in advance, but it appears that nobody has ever asked you these questions directly, and it is something important to discuss.
Please reply here, just below, to keep the discussion in one place. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 21:13, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Jytdog! Sorry for a late reply, I didn't know what to reply:) So, yes, I was involved in paid editing. As long as I understand I must disclose only those paid edits made after June 16, 2014, when these Terms of Use went into effect. Is this correct? As for other accounts, as long as I remember I have never edited here under other accounts. Best, --Pozytyv (talk) 21:22, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the replying. The legalistic reply is not promising. I am asking for facts, not what is "to the best of your recollection" which is the kind of answer that people who are being evasive say.
Please reply directly as to whether you have edited under other accounts -- if you have, nobody will do anything about that if you disclose the accounts, we label them as alts, and you say you will never do it again.
Please disclose the edits you made for pay, who was the client, who paid you, and any relevant affiliation (e.g. if you connected with the people who paid you via UpWork, UpWork would be the affiliation in that case). Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 16:41, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Jytdog: I disclosed my paid contributions at my userpage. I have not edited under other acounts here. Is there anything else? Also, could you please tell me if I should do the same thing for Wikimedia Commons, where I uploaded images for articles in question? Best, --Pozytyv (talk) 16:03, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Jytdog: could you please pay your attention to this matter?:). Pozytyv (talk) 11:36, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, sorry for the delay! Holidays and all.
Thanks for starting to disclose on your userpage.
There are two problems.
The first is that you are obligated to disclose employer, client, and affiliation, but you do not disclose the client. Would you please add a column for "client" and add that information?
Also, "ILoveScience" and "hiringking99, and "David J" are not clear employers. Would please clarify?
Once the disclosure is done we can move on to the peer review part of this. Thanks. Jytdoбg (talk) 21:35, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm probably sorry again for legalistic reply, but I don't know exactly who the clients are... as I can see here WP:PAID "Client: the person or organization on whose behalf the edits are made; the client is often the subject of the article." I've made my edits on behalf of my employers. I can guess that peopleperhour.com's user David J. who hired me to edit article "David Jamilly" is David Jamilly himself, but I don't know this for sure....
"ILoveScience" and "hiringking99, and "David J" are the users who hired me. "ILoveScience" sometimes signed his messages as "Aman", "David J" as David, and "hiringking99" did not sign... This is all that I know about them.. So the only person I can label as a "client" is David Jamilly, but I wouldn't do so, because I have never met this person, and only had some text communication with a user named "David J"... please let me know if you have any further questions/comments. Best, --Pozytyv (talk) 11:29, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Someone paid you. There had to be a name on the check or the transaction.Jytdog (talk) 21:03, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is also very clear that the client for the CES and management of depression was fisher-wallace. It is not clear how the client was for this diff on the penis article, but this appears to be refspam, so one of those two websites, perhaps. You also added a picture of a penis pump at the same time, so perhaps it is the maker of the pump - the edit to the penis article was negative about another approach. We should not have to do guesswork around your paid editing. You are obligated to disclose the client. This is not optional. Jytdog (talk) 21:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You also made edits to Kindness UK which is associated with David Jamily but you do not disclose that. Jytdog (talk) 21:30, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Updated. At freelancer.com I'm unable to see client's name or any other information. David Jamilly is what I see in the invoice. Fisher Wallace Laboratories is what user ILoveScience wrote me in one of the messages. Sorry for missing Erectile dysfunction. it was not intentional, and I think now the list is complete.
You also made edits to Kindness UK which is associated with David Jamily but you do not disclose that. = false statement. please let me know if you have any further questions/comments. Best,--Pozytyv (talk) 21:01, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have literally never done any editing etc on wikipedia but I just got so intrigued by this that I had to chime in lol...
You will never believe how I ended up on this page and I can't either... But I think this guy's historical activity goes against what wikipedia is all about
To me, this guy definitely looks like he is paid based on a thorough review of all his activity.
But damn. I'll never know the story behind this. I need to know...
I'll be back in 10 years for the truth2601:483:4500:4D99:BC1A:2E23:CF4D:EFFB (talk) 03:37, 9 September 2017 (UTC)negatyv[reply]
Hello, Pozytyv. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Kacher (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 10:44, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hello, Pozytyv. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Liste2myradio logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ThemFromSpace 15:35, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
