User talk:PhilippineRevolution

Manila Rail Transit color[edit]

Hello, PhilippineRevolution. You have new messages at Template talk:Manila Rail Transit color.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ways to improve Golden City 1 railway station[edit]

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. PhilippineRevolution, thanks for creating Golden City 1 railway station!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. /

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 23:31, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Pacita MG railway station[edit]

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. PhilippineRevolution, thanks for creating Pacita MG railway station!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. /

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 23:37, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MRT Station/doc[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

This is a different template than {{LRT Station}}. There are no pages that end with "MRT station", so this template does not have a second parameter governing capitalization. Please stop adding incorrect information.

Useddenim (talk) 13:53, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LRT Station/doc[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Repeatedly making a change that other editors revert and then asking for consensus on a talk page is not good-faith editing. Please take this warning seriously. Useddenim (talk) 16:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste moves[edit]

On a few of the pages you recently moved, you performed cut and paste moves. This is not allowed on Wikipedia, is it loses authors' attributions of their contributions - something required for proper licensing. I have reverted these cut and paste moves. If you desire to proceed with the page moves, please follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves. --Scott Alter (talk) 17:41, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Using Metrostar Express[edit]

Kindly cite reason why it is still reverted old logo and old brand as there is no source URL or press release explicitly stating continuous usage the "Metrostar Express" name and logo. Please go to DOTC MRT3 at North depot and ask the management. Our readers are confused with these reverts you are doing despite changes in all signage in all stations and press releases. As of today, the website http://dotcmrt3.gov.ph/index.php do not bear the old logo and old brand name. --Exec8 (talk) 03:56, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please be specific on your sources. The logo you posted is for the private corporation currently headed by Mr. Manuel V. Pangilinan, the private corporation is the owner of the system. The logo MetroRail is for the brand and for DOTC-MRT3, a government agency under DOTC. DOTC-MRT3 is the administrator and operator of the system. Unlike LRTA who is both the owner, operator and administrator, MRTC and DOTC-MRT3 are separate entities.--Exec8 (talk) 04:37, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The mere use of that logo means that "Metrostar express" is still the train's branding but the management decided to show the new corporate logo instead. So the "new logo" would be best to be put into the Metro Rail Transit Corporation article rather than the Manila Metro Rail Transit System --> This needs to be cited. The "Metrostar Express" branding is in use during the time MRTC has direct involvement in the design and maintenance of stations. Now that the state bought the economic interest of MRTC^[1], and from the entry of the current administrator (general manager)^[2], and in the recent court case involving the purchase of new locomotives (trains)^[3], it affirms the argument that the operator is the one in charge in the upgrade, design and maintenance of the MRT 3 line and not the owner. --Exec8 (talk) 04:53, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you are still providing me these arguments not supported by sources. Wikipedia is not a political organization and merely stating what is being officially released and reported to the public not assumptions, opinions and gossips. --Exec8 (talk) 04:58, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So are reverting the logos back. Please site your source URLs. --Exec8 (talk) 05:36, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are barely new to the edit process. When other editors ask you sources for your argument on the argument The mere use of that logo means that "Metrostar express" is still the train's branding but the management decided to show the new corporate logo instead. you must be specific and explicit. As this is still contested, the best resort is to delete the logo and branding from the article. --Exec8 (talk) 05:45, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transportation in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Juan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting your 'undo' on Manila Light Rail Transit System Line 2[edit]

Hi. I have reverted your 'Undo' of my edits on because your reason is invalid. First of all, I did not add anything to the lead section of the article, I just rearranged and clarify some information for non-Filipino readers. This is the English Wikipedia not WikiPilipinas. Do not assume that ONLY Filipinos will read Philippine articles. There are 'Manila's in Utah, Arkansas, etc. Please see Manila (disambiguation). Only Filipinos know what EDSA stands for. The MRT-2 line does not run just "along" segments of Recto Avenue, etc. is technically incorrect. Per WP:Lead section, The lead should be able to stand alone as a CONCISE overview (not a misrepresentation).

Also, completely reverting previous edits just because you did not agree with some of it, is an unjustifiable use of 'Undo'. Please see HELP:Reverting and Wikipedia:Revert only when necessary. My purpose as a Wikipedia editor is to improve articles if I see fit, following WP:Lead section and WP:MOS - "write articles with consistent, clear, and precise language, layout, and formatting promoting clarity and cohesion". I combined the dispersed information about heavy rail into the third paragraph. Line 2 is the "3rd" rapid transit line after LRT-1 (1984) and MRT-3 (1999). Identifying what is 'it' while there are too many nouns in the prior sentence is not redundancy, it's clarification. I also added Wikilinks to some of the words on the article, which were discarded when you reverted my edits. Again, please do not misuse the UNDO (Revert) function. Just a reminder, there is no ownership of articles in Wikipedia per WP:OWN. Anybody can edit any articles in Wikipedia to improve them. Thanks. - Briarfallen (talk) 19:56, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PNR Metro Commuter[edit]

Hello. I noticed that you have been editing a lot of Philippine railway articles. A lot of information you put are mostly unsourced/wrong. Please stop this. I will be reverting some of your edits.

Hiwilms (talk) 11:48, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pasig River may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Macedonian Radio Television[edit]

Before moving numerous pages, please read Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English). You changed and renamed numerous mentions of MRT to MPT. MRT stands for "Makedonska radio televizija" and is the transliteraion of the Cyrillic form "Македонска радио телевизија" whose initialism would be "МРТ" -- [[ axg // ✉ ]] 14:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi it has come to my attention that it is only the english articles that uses "MRT" instead of "MPT" which is used in the rest of other language wiki articles...

The Czech, Germany, Spanish, French, Croatian, Italian, Dutch, Polish, Portuguese, Thai, Turkish, the majority of which use the Latin alphabet, in which all these other languages refer to it as "MRT", "MRTV" or other varitions in which the Cyrillic "Р" is transliterated to a Latin "R". As per the guidelines at Wikipedia:Article titles: "Names not originally in a Latin alphabet, such as Greek, Chinese, or Russian names, must be transliterated."

...especially the Macedonian one. Debunking your romanized alphabet argument, ...

Actually further supporting my argument, since Macedonian, Bulgarian, Russian, Serbian, and Ukrainian use the Cyrillic alphabet and thus no need to transliterate it into Latin.

...it could be seen how even the logo has put "MPT" in a romanized alphabet form therefore should be the one to be followed.

Again it's using Cyrillic and as per Wikipedia:Article titles, it must be transliterated. The Wikipedia article for the Russia-1 is located their at its English name, and not at Россия-1. Al Jazeera is located at Al Jazeera and not الجزيرة.

It is practice here in wikipedia to use the official naming used by the one being described in the article no matter what their translation to english might be...

Wikipedia does not go be official names, it goes by common names, so the official name of the UK is "The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland", but its common name is the United Kingdom in which the article is located. Many more can be seen at WP:UCRN.

such as Volkswagen which in direct romanized translation is "Folkswagen" but the former prevailed...

Volkswagen is already in a Latin alphabet and does not need to be Romanised/Latinised/transliterated, and thus as a common name is located at Volkswagen, rather than "Folkswagen" or the correct translation: "People's car".

...due to it being the one used in the official logo of the company albeit being romanized too.

Again read above, we don't title articles on the official name or what the logo says, especially when the Volkwagon logo does not contain the words "Volkwagon", but rather the initials "VW"

I understand your argument on the main article "Macedonian Radio Television" that is why I kept that because its original name would not make sense in an expanded form here in english wiki. But its acronym should not be meddled upon especially it has a logo to prove it and the main article could provide the knowledge why MPT and what is its translation to english.

Again see above. I should also point out that only the basic Latin alphabet could be used in a web address (URL), the address for the company is located at www.mrt.com.mk and not www.mpt.com.mk.

Lastly the MRT 1 and MRT 2 pages should be really up for a disambiguation as the MRT worldwide may refer to Mass Rapid Transit or an equivalent rail term.

MRT is already a disambiguation page. MRT 1 is the only article on Wikipedia with that name. MRT 2 was also the only article with that name, the Manila system is located at Manila Light Rail Transit System Line 2, of which can be shortened to "MRT Line 2", "MRT-2", or "Megatren", if people were coming to the MRT 2 page all confused, a simple Hatnote at the top of the article is the way to go, rather than an undiscussed and controversial page move. -- [[ axg // ✉ ]] 11:44, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of roads in Metro Manila, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taytay. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 20:17, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}}

Comment:: Three of these account have also been active on Commons and interacted with each other there. Looking at this "discussion", the assumption of sockpuppetry does make sense to me. FDMS 4 09:34, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:: Basically interactions were an ask of permission as what you have asked me to do. I dont think that such interaction is already sockpuppetry. PhilippineRevolution 15:40, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am neither a Wikipedia or Commons CheckUser nor admin, I'm just asking the administrator dealing with this request to consider your Commons activity too. Although your comments over there are all similar (no {{support}}/{{comment}}, but '''Support'''/'''Comment''' and of course the same opinion), I only suspected a socky relationship having read the SPI case. FDMS 4 21:52, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well I aint gonna go a fair process anyways just like what they did here apparently @RioHondo: is a big power tripper bullying smaller contributors here for his own agenda by calling me a puppet of someone I do not know despite the block being only a possilikely and was never confirmed that I was. Apparently the user does not seem to know the word consensus either as seen in the recent talk page dicussion wherein there were no true final agreement between him and other users such as HTD and carries out things already at his will. See how he bullied his way into kicking me and other users out of a civilized talk about MRT-2? I just hope that he would not victimize more users here as maybe he might be really this Jerome guy wherein Jerome is his fall guy for opposing users. I do hope I could open a SPI investigation with him, HTD, and this Jerome guy as maybe they are the true socks. Just when I thought the Government is the dirtiest place there could be, Riohondo the user proved me there is so much more. Anyways delete my images on commons if you want to just never rename them to "LRT-2" or change something to that incorrect name. To the big bully, I hope you could still sleep with your conscience clean every night with what your are doing to others. Please never run for public office we dont need more bullies like you there. PhilippineRevolution 17:19, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For your latest comment, I've revoked access to your talk page. You may appeal through WP:UTRS.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:26, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Orphaned non-free image File:MRT-2 2014 stored value ticket.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MRT-2 2014 stored value ticket.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MRT-2 2014 stored value ticket map.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MRT-2 2014 stored value ticket map.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:00, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Manila MRT-2 2004 single journey ticket.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Manila MRT-2 2004 single journey ticket.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MRT-2 2014 single journey ticket map.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MRT-2 2014 single journey ticket map.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MRT-2 2014 single journey ticket.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MRT-2 2014 single journey ticket.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/PNR left/MetroCommuter[edit]

Template:S-line/PNR left/MetroCommuter has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:45, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Robinsons Novaliches Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Robinsons Novaliches Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kamuning Road for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kamuning Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamuning Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:28, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pureza Street for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pureza Street is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pureza Street until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:54, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Juan Ruiz Street for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Juan Ruiz Street is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan Ruiz Street until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:34, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anonas Street for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anonas Street is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anonas Street until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:56, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.gov.ph/downloads/2013/02feb/20130228-EO-0126-BSA.pdf

[2] ttp://attyalsvitangcoliii.com/PROFILE.htm

[3] ttp://www.dotc.gov.ph/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=737:dotc-wins-court-case-on-adding-more-mrt-coaches&Itemid=103

[1]

[2]

[3]