User talk:Pavegecko

Your submission at Articles for creation: L. Todd Wood (October 16)[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/L. Todd Wood.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —Anne Delong (talk) 22:46, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Pavegecko, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation: L. Todd Wood (October 25)[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/L. Todd Wood.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 15:12, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: L. Todd Wood (October 29)[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/L. Todd Wood.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 02:50, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Pavegecko. You have new messages at 78.26's talk page.
Message added 11:48, 29 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 11:48, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Status and Advice[edit]

As an administrator who frequently works with articles on books and their authors, I unfortunately must advise you that the authors of self-published novels are almost never considered suitable for articles in an encyclopedia, and none of the other accomplishments seem to have the least chance of being considered notable here either. If the books shouldhappen to get major reviews in 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases, and not local newspapers, it might be another matter, but the rest of the material would remain irrelevant. DGG ( talk ) 21:43, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/L. Todd Wood concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/L. Todd Wood, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/L. Todd Wood[edit]

Hello Pavegecko. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "L. Todd Wood".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/L. Todd Wood}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 13:20, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]