User talk:Orser67/Archive 2
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Disambiguation link notification for March 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- John Quincy Adams
- added links pointing to Sabine River and Native American
- Presidency of John Quincy Adams
- added a link pointing to Thomas Hart Benton
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Timeline of the presidency of Woodrow Wilson
Sorry for the reverts; I think it's fine to publish it the way it is now. Cheers. Ethanbas (talk) 05:25, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
No worries, thanks for unreverting. Orser67 (talk) 19:23, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Presidency of George W. Bush, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Medicare and Richard Armitage. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Andrew Jackson
- added a link pointing to Marshal law
- Presidency of Andrew Jackson
- added a link pointing to Mexican
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Buchanan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ulster Scots. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Presidency of Calvin Coolidge
- added a link pointing to Nativism
- Presidency of Martin Van Buren
- added a link pointing to John Forsyth
- United States House of Representatives elections, 2018
- added a link pointing to Tom Reed
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Inadvertent featured picture removal?
About six weeks ago you were merging material on the John Quincy Adams biography and removed a section, noting in the comment that the removal was mostly redundant material.[1] One of the things that vanished with that edit was the only featured picture at the biography: a digitally restored version of the final portrait taken during Adams' lifetime. Unfortunately Wikipedia's software tends to obscure featured picture status (you would have to click twice on the image, then scroll downward before the FP marker is visible).
This was sketched inside the Congressional rotunda after he collapsed with a stroke during a vote. The image is high resolution and it was pretty much never published until Wikipedia's restoration because the original is badly faded, yellowed, and stained. Kind of special to present something like this.
Would you have any objection to reinstating it? Durova412 18:51, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- I would have no objections at all! Thank you for explaining the situation, I did not mean to remove a featured picture. I restored the picture to the article, but feel free to place it in another location in the article. Orser67 (talk) 19:10, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Help with Congressional Institute article
Hello, Orser67! I found your name looking around at various political-related articles, and it seems like you have an interest in American politics, so I hope it's ok for me to reach out to ask if you'd be interested to help with a COI edit request in this topic area? The article for the Congressional Institute very much needs some work; the existing content of the article is overly detailed, promotional for the organization, has inline external links, and content that is not properly sourced. On behalf of the organization, I'm seeking to update the page with a new draft that trims the whole article down and provides thorough sourcing. There's an edit request on the Talk page here that provides more details. Unfortunately, so far I've been unable to find someone to review the draft. As I have a COI (I'm working for the Institute as part of my work with Beutler Ink) I won't edit the article directly and instead would love for an uninvolved editor to review the draft and make the changes if they're appropriate. Do you think you'd be able to take a look? Thanks in advance! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 19:44, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hey, sorry for the delay in getting back to you. Unfortunately I'm busy with my current wiki-commitments and real-life commitments, but good luck with improving the article. Orser67 (talk) 01:41, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply Orser67, I appreciate it. Another editor has been able to review, so this request is now resolved. Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 02:33, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Editor of the Week
|
Editor of the Week | |
| Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your polite political editing. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project) |
User:Buster7 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
- Orser67 became a full-time contributor late in 2013. Since then he has worked on, among other things, various United States election and campaign articles and articles about U.S. presidents such as the presidencies of Wilson, Coolidge, McKinley, Adams as well as Obama and Trump. Editing political articles can be treacherous and prone to pitfalls and conflict. But Orser67 is congenial and diplomatic in conversation. He takes time to compliment which helps create dialogue rather than drama. His demeanor deserves acknowledgement.
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
Thanks again for your efforts! Lepricavark (talk) 20:26, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
- Oh wow, thank you for the acknowledgement, and thank you User:Buster7 for the nomination. I try to make useful contributions and it feels good to know that other people appreciate my efforts. Orser67 (talk) 01:40, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Donald Trump the Republican presumptive nominee
I believe you were the first editor of Republican Party vice presidential candidate selection, 2016 to say that Donald Trump became the "presumptive nominee". I invite you to add any comment you may have to a discussion at Talk:Attempted assassination of Donald Trump#Presumptive nominee. —Anomalocaris (talk) 15:43, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
re map
That map is old! You should look at the redone maps at Territorial evolution of the United States, which go back now to 1776, as well as the "snapshot" (as opposed to "change") views at [2]. Glad you like them! If you need any modifications or if you need me to point out a specific file, let me know. :) --Golbez (talk) 17:49, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
- Much appreciated. I think I will use this one. Orser67 (talk) 18:16, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
- You may want this one, which is the "snapshot" of that time period: File:United_States_Central_map_1784-05-12_to_1787-07-13.png If you like, I can make one with all the text removed. --Golbez (talk) 18:44, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Paul Clements for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Clements is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Clements until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
(Note: The article was nominated by an anonymous IP editor--I only completed the nomination on their behalf as a courtesy and do not necessarily share their opinion.) --Finngall talk 00:52, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Adam Young (politician) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam Young (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Young (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mz7 (talk) 22:46, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Content dispute in United States Senate elections, 2018 article
There is a two-way content dispute in the United States Senate elections, 2018 which we need others to give their opinions on. Can you join in on the talk page? Steelbeard1 (talk) 16:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Orser, This is a courtesy message to let you know that an article you created (History of the Thirteen Colonies) has been proposed for merger into a pre-existing article on the same topic. See the talk page for links to the discussion. Blueboar (talk) 21:59, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
2020 Senate Map
File:2020 Senate election map.png Can you change the 2020 Senate Map to reflect an unknown incumbent for Alabama to reflect an unknown incumbent instead of a a Republican because the special election to determine the next incumbent won't be held for two more months? I would be really appreciated. Count Awesome (talk) 14:43, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Thank you! Count Awesome (talk) 21:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for fixing up contradictions in FDR article
Thank you for doing the research and fixing (I think) the contradictions (concerning unemployment rates) I had found in the FDR article, and for making the nice table. AAABBB222 (talk) 01:23, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- No problem, I think it's better now that it's clear where the estimates come from. Orser67 (talk) 04:04, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
On this day, 12 years ago...
|
Hey, Orser67. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Lepricavark (talk) 05:51, 22 October 2017 (UTC) |
|
Nomination for deletion of Template:Kansas statewide elected officials
Template:Kansas statewide elected officials has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 22:08, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Orser67. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Janice Kovach for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janice Kovach is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janice Kovach until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 01:52, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- You had created the article a while back and had declined a prod some time ago. I'm curious if your perspectives on this article have changed since you created it. Any reply would be appreciated. Alansohn (talk) 03:06, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- The Top 100: NFL's Greatest Players (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to John Hannah, John Mackey, Bruce Smith and Jack Lambert
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
The article Josh Maxwell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:POLITICIAN, mayors are generally not notable and neither are unsuccessful candidates for state house of reps.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 00:46, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Brilliant Idea Barnstar |
| Really appreciate your redistricting article - great job! Guyb123321 (talk) 13:59, 26 December 2017 (UTC) |
Nomination of Daniel Guerrero for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Guerrero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Guerrero until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 07:14, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Alert
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.— Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 10:28, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Franklin D. Roosevelt
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Franklin D. Roosevelt you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 21:20, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Washington
Hello, do you mind if I add this sentence to the end of the section on the Northwest Indian War? Thanks.LittleJerry (talk) 21:49, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
- Believing that the natives were on the verge of extinction due to uncontrolled white settlement in protected lands, Washington and Knox sought to assimilate them into American society.[1]
- Seems reasonable to me, any objections User:Eddie891? Orser67 (talk) 21:58, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
- Nope You can add it. Keep in mind that, while it was kind of you to ask, I do not own the article, and even if I disagreed, you could still add it. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:00, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
- Seems reasonable to me, any objections User:Eddie891? Orser67 (talk) 21:58, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Native American Policy". George Washington's Mount Vernon. Retrieved February 6, 2018.
Disambiguation link notification for February 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Presidency of Andrew Jackson, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Thomas Hart Benton and Revolutionary War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Editor's Barnstar |
| VERY GOOD! DuilioJapanlove (talk) 14:57, 14 February 2018 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Franklin D. Roosevelt
The article Franklin D. Roosevelt you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Franklin D. Roosevelt for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 02:02, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Presidency of George Washington
As Wehwalt has recommended a section on Martha Washington, I've quickly cobbled a section together at User:Eddie891/sandbox/GW#First Lady. Before (if at all) I add it, I thought I might check in with you. Do you think it should be added? Suggestions? Anything to add? Where should it go? General thoughts? Eddie891 Talk Work 02:14, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- In working on other presidency articles I haven't been sure how much to include about the president's personal life and family, but in general I haven't devoted too much time to them with the thought that the bio article usually covers them. However, given that Martha Washington was the first First Lady, I think it makes sense to include a paragraph or two about her. I think what you have now is pretty much what I'd cover. I would add in a note that the term "First Lady" wasn't used until later. As for placement, how about right below the Vice president section? Orser67 (talk) 02:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello, could you add brief mentions of the Treaty of New York and the Treaty of Holston? LittleJerry (talk) 19:25, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- I did. I stated on the FAC page that "I think mention of the Treaty of New York and Holston should be added as well. Aside from that, I have no major objections." LittleJerry (talk) 22:43, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Trusts broken up by TR
Hello (again)! I really hate to be a nag, but I was trying to list all of the trusts broken up by Theodore Roosevelt here. Apparently there were 44. Do you know if there is anywhere that there is a list? Eddie891 Talk Work 01:19, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- No idea. I guess I have two potentially helpful thoughts. You can view a list of Supreme Court cases here. All of the anti-trust cases should be titled "United States vs. x" or "x vs. United States." You could also try the Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities. I'd be interested to view the list if you ever get it done. Orser67 (talk) 02:07, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- Google Books to the rescue (pg. 47) Orser67 (talk) 02:15, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 18
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- James Madison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Buffalo
- Presidency of James Madison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Buffalo
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Presidencies of Grover Cleveland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nativism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Presidency of Millard Fillmore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Hart Benton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Invitation to the Portals WikiProject...
You are invited to join the effort to revitalize and improve the Portal system.
The Portals WikiProject was rebooted on April 17th, and is going strong. Sixty-six editors have joined so far, with more joining daily. We're having a blast, and excitement is high...
Our goal is to update, upgrade, and maintain portals.
In addition to working directly on portals, we are developing tools to make portals more dynamic (self-updating), and to make building and maintaining portals easier. We've finished two tools so far, with more to come. They are Template:Transclude lead excerpt and Template:Transclude random excerpt.
Discussions are underway about how to further upgrade portals, and what the portals of the future will be.
There are plenty of tasks (including WikiGnome tasks too).
With more to come.
We may even surprise ourselves and exceed all expectations. Who knows what we will be able to accomplish in what may become the biggest Wikicollaboration in years.
See ya at the WikiProject!
Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 06:55, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Presidency of Richard Nixon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clean Air Act (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Some nice work on improving the article. I have always wanted to bring the main JFK article up to GA status, but have not had the time I used to have to invest in such work. Both the main JFK and RFK articles could use some work, if you have the time. Thanks, Kierzek (talk) 13:02, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks! I would love to bring all of the main president bios articles up to GA (especially since readers view them a lot more than the presidency articles), but unfortunately I need to cut back on my Wikipedia time after this month due to real-life commitments. Orser67 (talk) 16:56, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much
The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.
By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.
Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.
If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.
Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 23:32, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ping}} me. Thank you. -TT
Possible Wikipedia-integrated publication
I came across the Wikipedia article that you helped to write on the Presidency of George Washington.
Would you be interested in putting it (or any other article) though external, academic peer review for publication in the WikiJournal of Humanities? It's an academic journal in the same format as the medical journal www.WikiJMed.org.
It couples the rigour of academic peer review with the extreme reach of the encyclopedia. It is therefore an excellent way to achieve public engagement, outreach and impact public understanding of science. Peer-reviewed articles are dual-published both as standard academic PDFs, as well as directly into Wikipedia. This improves the scientific accuracy of the encyclopedia, and rewards academics with citable, indexed publications. It also provides much greater reach than is normally achieved through traditional scholarly publishing.
Anyway, let me know whether you'd be interested in putting an article through academic peer review (either solo, or with a team of coauthors). Alternatively, if you would prefer to write on a different topic, we may be able to accommodate you.
Further information at v:WikiJournal_of_Humanities/Publishing. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 12:02, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for the invitation, but I'm currently trying to limit my time spent on Wikipedia due to real-life obligations, and I just don't think I can make a major time commitment at this point in my life. I will definitely be keeping an eye on the journal, though. Orser67 (talk) 05:22, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
With this edit you made many changes to the article, including this incomplete sentence in the "Administration" section, covering Lincoln's cabinet: "Seward became the [47]
". I don't have access to that ref (Paludan), so I'm not sure what you intending to add there. Please take a look and fix it when you have a moment. I don't think it's urgent however. It's been like that for five months and no one else seems to have noticed it. FYI - theWOLFchild 00:54, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Jennings Bryan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Entente and Alton Parker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrew Mellon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ulster Scots (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Evans Hughes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New Freedom and Stone Court (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Progress bars for WP:US Presidents?
Hi, Orser67! I've noticed the task list you added to WP US Presidents, and was wondering if you wanted me to add progress bars as well, or if you think that would look too cluttered? Also, I'm wondering if it's worth marking incumbent President/Vice-President in a different colour, as I'm not sure how practical it would be to try to get FA (or even GA) for a sitting President/Vice President. — Sasuke Sarutobi (push to talk) 17:33, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Sasuke Sarutobi, those both sound like excellent ideas to me. I went ahead and implemented your idea for a different color for incumbents, because I agree that it would be quite difficult to get either incumbent to GA. Orser67 (talk) 18:10, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Awesome. I've added the {{progression}} bars - I'm not sure about them centring, though, as it looks a bit messy to me. I might take a look at either being able to set the progression template to float left like the tables, or possibly even use a form of {{progression rainbow}} to reflect the GA-status articles on the same bar. — Sasuke Sarutobi (push to talk) 18:22, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of unsuccessful major party candidates for President of the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal Republican Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 16 September 2018 (UTC)