User talk:Operosa

Your submission at Articles for creation: Operosa (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Operosa.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hasteur (talk) 20:10, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Operosa, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hasteur (talk) 20:10, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Operosa concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Operosa, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Operosa logo.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Operosa logo.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:06, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Operosa logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Operosa logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:41, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Operosa

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Operosa ‎ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

A.Minkowiski ^{_Lets t@lk} 18:53, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Operosa Opera Festival

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Operosa", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it appears to represent an organization rather than an individual. Please read WP:CORPNAME. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. --David Biddulph (talk) 04:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your user page

Please note that your user page is not the place for a draft article. The draft on which you were working is at Draft:Operosa. The purpose of user pages is explained at Wikipedia:User pages. - David Biddulph (talk) 15:34, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Operosa. You have new messages at Sam Sailor's talk page.
Message added 01:38, 26 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 01:38, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Your user name and conflict of interest

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Draft:Operosa, and I noticed that your username, "Operosa", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Trammel Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", and "WidgetFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a username change that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Voceditenore (talk) 12:41, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Operosa Euxinograd Castle.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Operosa Euxinograd Castle.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Operosa Euxinograd.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Operosa Euxinograd.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Operosa (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CookieMonster755 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Operosa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CookieMonster755 (talk) 18:16, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Operosa (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aerospeed was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Operosa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aerospeed (Talk) 20:24, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Your pleas for re-review of your Draft on my talk page

Do not restore or further poke me about your draft. I've indicated what I see the problem as, other editors have noticed the same problem, and your username is quite troublesome. The next time you poke me, I'm going to open a Administrators Noticeboard discussion about having you blocked for Role account misbehavior as your own commentary has suggested that you are editing either as multiple people or as the corporate entity for the organization. Hasteur (talk) 13:02, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

• Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
• Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
• Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Diannaa (talk) 02:42, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Blocked Operosa

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Operosa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

SlowLearner (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Hello, I kindly request that you accept a change of name for this account and that you unblock the page Draft: Operosa. I am a fan of opera in the Balkan region and like so many people enjoy very much using Wikipedia. I am in awe of your work and I had never tried to be active user or edit on Wikipedia before this and wanted to start by trying to help with making a page for a very nice festival in this region. Before I started I contacted Operosa and they said that someone had already started a page but which was rejected. They had been given the account password and I have tried to help using the Operosa username and also with my own username MariaKristianova. Now it seems I have caused more harm instead of good and I am quite confused what I can do now. I sincerely hope I have not caused a permanent block for this festival. I admire what they do in the Balkans; in my humble opinion they deserve to be included in Wikipedia. Obviously your vast experience and dedicated expertise will determine the result. As much as I would like to contribute to Wikipedia this has not been a promising start. Thank you for your consideration.

Decline reason:

Self-admitted compromised account. Also self-admitted sockpuppetry, although here I would assume good faith but ignorance of the rules.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:41, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

I suggest using only User:MariaKristianova from here on out, as we now have no choice but to leave this account blocked as compromised. We do not permit shared accounts to edit, as it interferes with Wikipedia's content licences. As for the draft itself, it still exists and may still be edited; the block is solely on this user account. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 18:50, 23 April 2015 (UTC)