User talk:Northamerica1000/Archive 30
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 25 | ← | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | → | Archive 35 |
Calling all WikiProject X members!
Hello fellow member! WikiProject X needs your help!
We studied the various needs that WikiProjects have, and have come up with some ideas for our first round of WikiProject tool development. These include:
- An automatically updated WikiProject directory that surfaces WikiProject-related metrics and automatically generates a list of active participants and potential members;
- A lightweight, optional alternative to WikiProject banners, featuring an option to quickly send a message to the named WikiProjects;
- A tool that bootstraps WikiProjects; and
- A worklist generation script for WikiProjects
We are now looking for volunteer coders to work on these projects. If you are interested in developing these tools, or if you would to volunteer for other tasks, check out our new volunteers portal. Thank you for your help!
Cheers, Harej (talk) 20:38, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Check of non-admin closure of AFD
Hi, I have just tried my hand at closing the AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohi (2nd nomination). I think it met the criteria for a non-admin closure. Would you be kind enough to have a quick look and see if I have done the right thing? Thank you very much, AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 06:32, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Athomeinkobe: The close is proper per WP:SK#1 because the nominator withdrew and nobody else in the discussion advocated for deletion. The close is also in order as per procedures delineated at Wikipedia:Deletion process – Non-administrators closing discussions. I added a </small> markup to the close to fix a formatting error and added bold to the word "keep" in the Old afd multi template at Talk:Mohi. North America1000 06:38, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for your prompt attention. I thought something looked odd when I was looking at the page. The missing </small> was obviously the problem. Thank you once again. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 07:01, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Regal Show World for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Regal Show World is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regal Show World until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:18, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
April 2015 GOCE newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors April 2015 Newsletter
  March drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in last month's backlog-reduction drive. Of the 38 people who signed up, 18 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. April blitz: The one-week April blitz, again targeting our long requests list, will run from April 19–25. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the requests page. Sign up here! May drive: The month-long May backlog-reduction drive, with extra credit for articles tagged in December 2013, January and February 2014 and all request articles, begins soon. Sign up now! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Miniapolis, Jonesey95, Biblioworm and Philg88. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:29, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Today's articles for improvement - TEST
- Hello Northamerica1000:
- This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 20 of 2015. Thanks for participating!
Today's articles for improvement - TEST2
- Hello Northamerica1000:
- This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 20 of 2015. Thanks for participating!
Disambiguation link notification for April 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Pickled fruit
- added links pointing to Orange, Currant and Fig
Fixed North America1000 12:24, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Plum cake
- added a link pointing to Currant
- Fixed North America1000 12:24, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Specialty foods
Hello! Your submission of Specialty foods at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:34, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 16, 2015)
Hello, Northamerica1000.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: History of technology • Garbage picking Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 01:25, 13 April 2015 (UTC) • |
|---|
The Signpost: 15 April 2015
- Traffic report: Furious domination
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:32, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 3
Greetings! For this month's issue...
We have demos!
After a lengthy research and design process, we decided for WikiProject X to focus on two things:
- A WikiProject workflow that focuses on action items: discussions you can participate in and tasks you can perform to improve the encyclopedia; and
- An automatically updating WikiProject directory that gives you lists of users participating in the WikiProject and editing in that subject area.
We have a live demonstration of the new WikiProject workflow at WikiProject Women in Technology, a brand new WikiProject that was set up as an adjunct to a related edit-a-thon in Washington, DC. The goal is to surface action items for editors, and we intend on doing that through automatically updated working lists. We are looking into using SuggestBot to generate lists of outstanding tasks, and we are looking into additional options for automatic worklist generation. This takes the burden off of WikiProject editors to generate these worklists, though there is also a "requests" section for Wikipedians to make individual requests. (As of writing, these automated lists are not yet live, so you will see a blank space under "edit articles" on the demo WikiProject. Sorry about that!) I invite you to check out the WikiProject and leave feedback on WikiProject X's talk page.
Once the demo is sufficiently developed, we will be working on a limited deployment on our pilot WikiProjects. We have selected five for the first round of testing based on the highest potential for impact and will scale up from there.
While a re-designed WikiProject experience is much needed, that alone isn't enough. A WikiProject isn't any good if people have no way of discovering it. This is why we are also developing an automatically updated WikiProject directory. This directory will surface project-related metrics, including a count of active WikiProject participants and of active editors in that project's subject area. The purpose of these metrics is to highlight how active the WikiProject is at the given point of time, but also to highlight that project's potential for success. The directory is not yet live but there is a demonstration featuring a sampling of WikiProjects.
Each directory entry will link to a WikiProject description page which automatically list the active WikiProject participants and subject-area article editors. This allows Wikipedians to find each other based on the areas they are interested in, and this information can be used to revive a WikiProject, start a new one, or even for some other purpose. These description pages are not online yet, but they will use this template, if you want to get a feel of what they will look like.
We need volunteers!
WikiProject X is a huge undertaking, and we need volunteers to support our efforts, including testers and coders. Check out our volunteer portal and see what you can do to help us!
As an aside...
Wouldn't it be cool if lists of requested articles could not only be integrated directly with WikiProjects, but also shared between WikiProjects? Well, we got the crazy idea of having experimental software feature Flow deployed (on a totally experimental basis) on the new Article Request Workshop, which seeks to be a place where editors can "workshop" article ideas before they get created. It uses Flow because Flow allows, essentially, section-level categorization, and in the future will allow "sections" (known as "topics" within Flow) to be included across different pages. What this means is that you have a recommendation for a new article tagged by multiple WikiProjects, allowing for the recommendation to appear on lists for each WikiProject. This will facilitate inter-WikiProject collaboration and will help to reduce duplicated work. The Article Request Workshop is not entirely ready yet due to some bugs with Flow, but we hope to integrate it into our pilot WikiProjects at some point.
Harej (talk) 00:57, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Re: Talkback
Just did... :-) GregorB (talk) 07:26, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- GregorB: Thanks for revisiting the discussion. North America1000 07:28, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- There was sometimes a problem when saving a page in VisualEditor. It is now fixed on all wikis. [1]
- VisualEditor sometimes showed empty warnings for wikis using Flagged Revisions. This is now fixed on all wikis. [2]
- You can get the new version of the Wikipedia app for iOS. With it you can share facts with your friends. [3]
- If you write JavaScript, you should stop using importScript and importStylesheet. [4]
Problems
- There was a problem with Labs on Monday. [5]
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since April 15. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from April 21. It will be on all Wikipedias from April 22 (calendar).
- Developers are renaming 1.5 million accounts. After that all accounts will be unique and will work on all wikis. [6] [7] [8]
- If your wiki has the auto-fill tool for citations, you can now use it when you edit a reference. [9]
- You can now give examples for template options in TemplateData. [10]
Meetings
- You can join the next weekly meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs are the most important. The meeting will be on April 22 at 18:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:30, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Grimsby Ice Factory
 | On 14 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Grimsby Ice Factory, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Grimsby Ice Factory was once the largest ice factory in the world? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Grimsby Ice Factory. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:32, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Today's articles for improvement
- Hello Northamerica1000:
- This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 20 of 2015. Thanks for participating!
DYK for Barbecue restaurant
| On 15 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Barbecue restaurant, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that some barbecue restaurants in the US are referred to as "shrines" due to their high-quality dishes, developed over many years or even over generations? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Barbecue restaurant. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:27, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Naem
| On 16 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Naem, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Naem. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Allen3 talk 00:24, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Invitation
|
Help
I logged in as Ooppss already used but it didn't let me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eerbbeeewww (talk • contribs) 02:13, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Eerbbeeewww: It does not appear that you created an account with this user name. An account under this name existed in April 2006 (link), but it does not appear that any edits were performed using it (link). On a different note, please be sure to sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes: ~~~~. North America1000 22:48, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
strange doors edit
Hello, thank you for taking the time to edit the page about The Strange Doors. However, could you explain what the edit summary "-ws" means? I'm new to Wikipedia, so it isn't clear to me. Many thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doorslife (talk • contribs) 09:17, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Doorslife: The edit I performed at Draft:The Strange Doors removed extra white space (blank lines) on the page. I abbreviate this action in the edit summary as "-ws". North America1000 22:44, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Also, please be sure to sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes: ~~~~. Thanks. North America1000 22:49, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Question about WP:SNOW for an AfD
Hi, could you please have a look at this AfD? The only opposing voter made the statement at a much earlier stage before many of the media sources had released their stories and interviews about the project. So, I'm wondering, can the AfD be closed per WP:SNOW? - Anonimski (talk) 20:18, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Anonimski: There are additional delete !votes in the discussion, and another contributor recently !voted to delete the article, so I recommend having the discussion run for the typical full seven days. North America1000 22:52, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Chicken Salad Chick
| On 17 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chicken Salad Chick, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chicken Salad Chick. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Allen3 talk 00:05, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Italian brands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Great Escape. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- Fixed. North America1000 04:08, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- All accounts are now unique and work on all wikis. [13] [14]
- You can read a report from experts who tested the security of MediaWiki. [15]
- There was a problem between VisualEditor and an antivirus software. It is now fixed. [16]
- You can help test VisualEditor to see if it works in your language. [17]
Problems
- Some Labs tools had problems due to a software bug. [18]
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since April 22. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from April 28. It will be on all Wikipedias from April 29 (calendar).
- It is now clearer that you can delete several rows and columns when you edit tables in VisualEditor. [19]
- You now see more information when you search for a template in VisualEditor. [20]
- You can now cancel when you add citations on desktop, or edit links on mobile, in VisualEditor. [21]
- You can now see the list of other formats for videos only after they're ready. [22]
Meetings
- You can join the next weekly meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs are the most important. The meeting will be on April 29 at 18:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:11, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 17, 2015)
 A satellite image demonstrating the Geography of Niger
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Aerophone • History of technology Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC) • |
|---|
The Signpost: 22 April 2015
- In the media: UK political editing; hoaxes; net neutrality
- Featured content: Vanguard on guard
- Traffic report: A harvest of couch potatoes
- Gallery: The bitter end
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Taziki's Mediterranean Café
Hello! Your submission of Taziki's Mediterranean Café at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 21:33, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notification; replied at the nomination page. North America1000 21:57, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Today's articles for improvement
- Hello Northamerica1000:
- This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 21 of 2015. Thanks for participating!
Hi, I think the new tab-based navigation is kind of excessive for the scale of the project. Something closer to the orignal design (links on the main page) should be sufficient and less intrusive. Would you mind if I revert the addition and try to figure out a more lightweight alternative? wctaiwan (talk) 01:53, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Wctaiwan: I like the tabs, and find them unobtrusive as they exist atop the project's pages. A problem with the project's pages is that many of them were orphaned, in which there were no links to them. If there are no links, then people won't know about various pages' existence, won't see them, and won't be able to understand the project's workings. North America1000 01:57, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- They weren't actually orphaned. Harej consolidated things under the Volunteers subpage a few days ago; prior to that they were linked from the main page (which is probably better; I'd probably change it back to something similar). That the tabs are on top of every project page is why I find them obtrusive (along with their size, the fact that they take up the full width, and the contrast). Sure, they're common on Wikipedia, but it's really not good design. Pages on one website really shouldn't be introducing their own persistent navigation elements (or, when you come down to it, their own page layouts, but it's probably an OK price to pay for making the main page of a WikiProject look interesting to visitors). Outside of the talk page link (which is duplicating the Vector/Monobook tabs, anyway), the links really aren't so crucial that they need to be visible on every page of the WikiProject. I'd strongly favour taking them out. wctaiwan (talk) 02:08, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- I have removed the black coloration in {{WikiProject X tabbed header}} to lessen its presence and have initiated a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject X § Tabbed header in hopes to obtain member input regarding the matter. In this manner, hopefully a consensus can be reached regarding its use. North America1000 02:20, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- N.b. Tabbed header replaced with {{WikiProject X sidebar}}. North America1000 19:02, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- I have removed the black coloration in {{WikiProject X tabbed header}} to lessen its presence and have initiated a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject X § Tabbed header in hopes to obtain member input regarding the matter. In this manner, hopefully a consensus can be reached regarding its use. North America1000 02:20, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- They weren't actually orphaned. Harej consolidated things under the Volunteers subpage a few days ago; prior to that they were linked from the main page (which is probably better; I'd probably change it back to something similar). That the tabs are on top of every project page is why I find them obtrusive (along with their size, the fact that they take up the full width, and the contrast). Sure, they're common on Wikipedia, but it's really not good design. Pages on one website really shouldn't be introducing their own persistent navigation elements (or, when you come down to it, their own page layouts, but it's probably an OK price to pay for making the main page of a WikiProject look interesting to visitors). Outside of the talk page link (which is duplicating the Vector/Monobook tabs, anyway), the links really aren't so crucial that they need to be visible on every page of the WikiProject. I'd strongly favour taking them out. wctaiwan (talk) 02:08, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:04, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Bangladesh
Hi. A few years back I sorted out most of the categories for settlements on wikipedia. To avoid confusion between town and city and village and town we decided on putting all in one category. For Bangladesh this should be avoided and instead replaced with whatever applies in Category:Populated places in Bangladesh by division.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:58, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Dr. Blofeld: Thanks for the information and notification. North America1000 04:45, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Dr. Blofeld: Update: Of note is that populated places that are verified as villages could be categorized as such. For example, see List of villages in Bangladesh, whereby some of the listed villages are verified by reliable sources as such (villages). North America1000 17:19, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Would you be willing to swing by M._William_Phelps, the already shrill arguments of Nom now fly so so bizarrely in the face of policy that it may be time to close the discussion, or perhaps to draw in another experienced editor? [23] I'm not sure how to proceed with an editor who flatly misstates policy, when no other editors have come to the page and it has been up for weeks already.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:27, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- E.M.Gregory: I'm presently working on other stuff, so I may not get to the AfD discussion. North America1000 13:06, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Bettifm
Hey.
I just noted your theory that User:Bettifm was secretly blocked for sock puppetry.
That doesn't seem to be the case, based on the block log here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3ABettifm
They were blocked for removing the AFD notice, but the block was extended to indefinite based on the accusation of sock puppetry.
Since the original block was incorrect, it would stand to reason that the extension of the block was similarly incorrect. I was wondering if you could perhaps amend your claim that they were secretly blocked for sock puppetry from the AFD closure notice. Thanks.
Fingers crossed the admin that extended it from 1 week to indefinite sees their mistake and undoes the error. I'd hate to see a good editor like Bettifm banned based on something as silly as being bold by removing an AFD that should never have been there in the first place. I think we should assume good faith a bit more. Mister Sneeze A Lot (talk) 13:54, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Furthermore, per their own admission, User:Tamaora is a "sister editor" of Bettifm, and was not hiding that they were a meatpuppet of each other, per their own user page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Tamaora&oldid=655168116 . I am certain that this does not violate WP:SOCK and the indefinite ban of both was made in error. The 1 week block was maybe fair enough though. Mister Sneeze A Lot (talk) 13:58, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Mister Sneeze A Lot: The indefinite block was performed by Bbb23, who is both an admin and a checkuser, and this did not occur secretly (link). As such, I suggest you ask inquire with them about the block. Gadfium performed the block before this, which was for one week, for removing an AfD template from an article (link, scroll down to second entry with the section header "Blocked"), so I suggest you contact this user about this block. The user removed the AfD template prematurely from the article at 09:18, 18 April 2015 (UTC) (diff) while the discussion was still occurring. The nominator did not withdraw until 14:01, 18 April 2015 (UTC) (diff). You state the block is incorrect, but this does not appear to be the case. I won't be changing the close at the AfD discussion to state they were "secretly" blocked, because this would be incorrect to state. North America1000 18:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Firstly, the block was for removing the AFD, as you agree to here, as I stated in the AFD, and as you "corrected" (incorrectly) in the closing of that AFD. Since you admit to being wrong above, I'd like you to just delete that line in the AFD, as it will be looked at in the future and some people might get the wrong idea. They were blocked indefinitely on the basis of an alleged sock puppet Tamaora, who, as stated above, is an admitted "sister editor" and hence is not in violation on Wikipedia's sock puppetry policy. I discussed this with the blocking editors and was told that I was secretly a sock puppet too. Thankfully, CheckUser confirmed that we are in different countries to each other, and are very unrelated. I am not asking you to investigate, just to correct your error in the AFD closing, for future reference. Thanks. Mister Sneeze A Lot (talk) 00:37, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- No, I have not admitted to being "wrong", because the chronology of events supports my response above in entirety. I have modified the close at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/When We Go To War to read "The result was speedy keep. Of note is that User:Bettifm was blocked (by another admin) for removing the AfD template from the article, and was later indefinitely blocked for sock puppetry (by another admin)." (link). The entire reason for this is because of your unblock request in the discussion. The block for the AfD template removal was for one week, the block for socking is indefinite. North America1000 00:45, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- I have nothing more to say about the indefinite block of the two accounts, although I found Mr. Sneeze A Lot's explanation as to why he was protesting the block to be interesting. Just a slight correction/addition about Bettifm's block history. He was blocked for one week by Gadfium for persistent addition of unsourced information. He was later blocked for one week by Gadfium for removing AfD tags. Then came my block.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:19, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, of course I noticed the first block, but there was no need to mention it in the AfD discussion, so I didn't. Thanks for your input Bbb23. North America1000 01:24, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Big sighs. Proof doesn't mean as much over here as it does in the real world. Mister Sneeze A Lot (talk) 01:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, of course I noticed the first block, but there was no need to mention it in the AfD discussion, so I didn't. Thanks for your input Bbb23. North America1000 01:24, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- I have nothing more to say about the indefinite block of the two accounts, although I found Mr. Sneeze A Lot's explanation as to why he was protesting the block to be interesting. Just a slight correction/addition about Bettifm's block history. He was blocked for one week by Gadfium for persistent addition of unsourced information. He was later blocked for one week by Gadfium for removing AfD tags. Then came my block.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:19, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- No, I have not admitted to being "wrong", because the chronology of events supports my response above in entirety. I have modified the close at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/When We Go To War to read "The result was speedy keep. Of note is that User:Bettifm was blocked (by another admin) for removing the AfD template from the article, and was later indefinitely blocked for sock puppetry (by another admin)." (link). The entire reason for this is because of your unblock request in the discussion. The block for the AfD template removal was for one week, the block for socking is indefinite. North America1000 00:45, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Firstly, the block was for removing the AFD, as you agree to here, as I stated in the AFD, and as you "corrected" (incorrectly) in the closing of that AFD. Since you admit to being wrong above, I'd like you to just delete that line in the AFD, as it will be looked at in the future and some people might get the wrong idea. They were blocked indefinitely on the basis of an alleged sock puppet Tamaora, who, as stated above, is an admitted "sister editor" and hence is not in violation on Wikipedia's sock puppetry policy. I discussed this with the blocking editors and was told that I was secretly a sock puppet too. Thankfully, CheckUser confirmed that we are in different countries to each other, and are very unrelated. I am not asking you to investigate, just to correct your error in the AFD closing, for future reference. Thanks. Mister Sneeze A Lot (talk) 00:37, 21 April 2015 (UTC)