User talk:Noles1984

Main | Contributions | Links | States & Counties Visited | Talk | Image Permission | Sandbox | Consulting Administrators

I, as a Wikipedia author, state that the information I write is factual as possible and sourced as thoroughly as needed. As a Review editor, I swear to edit and author with an unbiased opinion and to help Wikipedia be as factual as possible

This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

Notice to administrators:

This user's IP is used by more than one pc or laptop through a WiFi network. This IP notification has been recorded by email OTRS ticket 201009031000928. --Rupert D'Eath, Wikimedia Support Team, info-en-q@wikimedia.org

Talk Page Noles1984's Talk Page Click here to go to the main page. Noles1984 is an author and editor since March 26, 2006. He is located in: Archives March 2006 – May 2006 May 2006 – August 2006 August 2006 – December 2007 December 2007 – March 2008 Leave A Message Below Interesting project you left me a message on. Thanks. Are you interested in the domain wikimotorcycles.org? Bdegroodt (talk) 05:51, 27 March 2008 (UTC) RE wikimotorcycles.org, I am the domain owner and had to terminate the project due to limited time. I'm seeking a buyer of the domain and someone that'll put it to proper use. Bdegroodt (talk) 23:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC) I'm interested in any information/photos that you may have on Prince Murat Elementary at the former Dale Mabry Air Base in Tallahassee, FL. I understand that it was moved and renamed as the Southside Elementary School. Then later renamed again to Leonard A. Wesson Elementary School. i have searched and searched and found nothing of the history of this school. I've found relatives of key players that have been apart of this school. That's how i have the information i have. If any more information or photos that you may provide would be most apriative. If you need to contact me my email is christiew@mail.leon.k12.fl.us. Thank you! Willaim —Preceding unsigned comment added by Judoblkbelt (talk • contribs) 17:15, 15 April 2008 (UTC) You may want to consider Wikipedia:Dispute resolution after the mess with User:Steven Walling in the Talk:Catahoula Cur area. --Geofferic (talk) 02:35, 13 November 2008 (UTC) Cycle Chaos Id be glad to contribute. I looked at the KTM section and would be glad help out. Sorry it took me so long to get back to you though... KTM Jared 683 (talk) 21:53, 25 April 2008 (UTC) Red county Hi Noles, it is good to hear from you. I am sorry to hear you are having trouble though. I can't quite understand how or why you got directed to WP:ANI. I do see that Red County is a redirect to a mention of a county by that name in an article on a video game. Red county does not exist. I don't see any evidence of you being blocked from editing either one, so I am not sure what is going on. The way to handle multiple things with the same name is typically through a disambiguation page such as George Bush. If one of the uses is clearly predominate over the others then the simple form can redirect to the most common usage and then a note left at the top of the page. Compare the treatment of George Bush to George Washington, for instance. In terms of posting at WP:ANI, if you still feel you need to post there, try clicking on a section to edit and then adding your new section at the bottom of that section. Or, try having your post composed and ready to copy/paste. Either of those should help you avoid edit conflicts. I'm not sure if I've answered your question or not. Please let me know. Thanks, Johntex\talk 17:33, 28 April 2008 (UTC) Soybean Management Practices Hi Noles. I am a first time wikipedia user and i created a page called Soybean Management Practices. I noticed you commented on the soybean page and was wondering if you could take a look at mine and see what you think. thanks. User:Berkt —Preceding comment was added at 04:11, 4 May 2008 (UTC) Meetup Wikipedia:Meetup/Tampa -- You're invited! Hires an editor (talk) 20:18, 2 August 2008 (UTC) Meetup Wikipedia:Meetup/Gainesville, Florida - in the planning stages, if you're interested. Yeah, I know, but it wouldn't be during a home-game weekend, if that'll help. :) --Ebyabe (talk) 16:46, 3 August 2008 (UTC) Image copyright problem with Image:Newport Florida rc00182.jpg Image Copyright problem Thank you for uploading Image:Newport Florida rc00182.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 21:20, 3 August 2008 (UTC) Image copyright problem Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in. That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page. File:Newport Florida RC01254.png File:Newport Florida rc02470.jpg This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --18:31, 6 January 2009 (UTC) Merge of vacuum assisted closure wound therapy and negative pressure wound therapy? Hi! I noticed you have contributed to either or both of the aforementioned articles. If you have any thoughts about whether or not and/or how to merge the pages, please respond at the discussion page of negative pressure wound therapy. Thank you, Where next Columbus? (talk) 02:06, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Sir John Fiennes A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sir John Fiennes, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern: The subject of the article never acceded to a peerage and is of genealogical interest only. He can be discussed in the article on his father, whom he predeceased. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Choess (talk) 01:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC) Astian This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Astian, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Piacenzian. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history. This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC) Image tagging for File:Concord School Miccosukee Floridapr07084.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Concord School Miccosukee Floridapr07084.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator. To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. For more information on using images, see the following pages: Wikipedia:Image use policy Wikipedia:Image copyright tags Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC) Speedy deletion of G-W Invader A tag has been placed on G-W Invader, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Yintaɳ  21:04, 12 May 2009 (UTC) I hadn't noticed the company was defunct, my apologies. Yintaɳ  21:25, 12 May 2009 (UTC) May 2009 Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from G-W Invader, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Yintaɳ  21:10, 12 May 2009 (UTC) March of Dimes logo is outdated (5/14/2009) Hey there Noles1984. I was just looking at the March of Dimes logo that you uploaded in 2006 and it appears that they have changed their logo. Would you be able to replace the logo for them and also add it to their Wikipedia page? You can find the new logo at marchofdimes.com On the first page of the site they have some javascript blocking the "save as" ability for the logo, but you can save it off of any other section on the site. Thanks, Geoff http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:March_Of_Dimes_Logo.png Geoffgarcia (talk) 22:13, 14 May 2009 (UTC) Dates Hi, I noticed that you have been linking some dates at Horatio C. Newcomb recently. This practice is now deprecated. Please see WP:LINKING and WP:MOSNUM. Furthermore, there is an temporary Arbcom injunction on mass linking/delinking of chronological elements, although there is no suggestion from me that you are in breach whatsoever. I'm happy to respond to any inquiries you may have about the matter. Thank you for your attention. Ohconfucius (talk) 04:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC) Ordinal Congresses Thank you for your work adding the Infoboxes to the ordinal Congress articles. While you're at it, you can eliminate the "Dates of sessions" section and make sure there's a TOClimit template there too. See Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Congress/Ordinal congresses#Lede for more info.—Markles 15:47, 12 July 2009 (UTC) Minor edits High Noles, Per wp:minor, edits that change the meaning of an article shouldn't normally be marked as minor. Looking at your recent contributions, I see they're all marked as minor... perhaps you've inadvertantly ticked the "Mark all edits minor by default" check box in the Editing tab of your user preferences? Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 15:51, 21 July 2009 (UTC) In a nutshell, a minor edit is one that could never be the subject of any kind of dispute. For example, fixing a typo, making a spelling correction, and reverting unambiguous vandalism are all minor edits. Anything else should be considered a major edit, and if you're ever unsure, it's safest not to mark an edit as minor. The importance is that some editors choose to hide minor edits when viewing page histories or recent changes so they can focus on substantive changes. Nice work on all the new articles, by the way :-) Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 16:08, 21 July 2009 (UTC) Grey wolf It's not a matter of which one I prefer, it's a matter of which one is true. One says the grey wolf originated 300,000 years ago; the other says it originated 3,400,000 years ago. I reverted to the 300,000 year version because it was cited, and because Grey wolf has been a featured article for a long time and still has lots of people working on it, so I doubted there was a gigantic error in the lead. Perhaps it's the Canidae family as a whole that originated 3.4 million years ago, and not the grey wolf specifically? I'm only guessing. Anyway, I need to go to bed, so if you want to discuss it more it would be best to use Talk:Grey Wolf. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 16:17, 21 July 2009 (UTC) Request for clarification at Bear dog I think you misunderstood my request for clarification at the above article. The text at present states that the Amphicyonidae belong to the sub-family Amphicyoninae. Clearly, that isn't what you mean to say (and, indeed, isn't what the source quoted says), so I was asking what the sentence is intended to mean. In other words, when you say "these taxa belong to...", which taxa are you talking about? The text needs clarification, so that the reader can understand what you're saying here. Thanks. Anaxial (talk) 13:31, 27 July 2009 (UTC) OK, that makes more sense now. Thanks. Anaxial (talk) 13:56, 27 July 2009 (UTC) canis dirus It makes about as much sense as doing so for the wolf and coyote articles. Mariomassone (talk) 16:14, 28 July 2009 (UTC) Concerning Sister Genera in Oreodont Articles Technically speaking, only those genera in the same subfamily should be included as "sister genera," not all the genera in the same family.--Mr Fink (talk) 22:25, 6 August 2009 (UTC) Eoentelodon reply Not all authorities agree with the synonymy of Eoentelodon with Brachyhyops. Furthermore, you should not request that a synonymized taxon page: redirect it, instead.--Mr Fink (talk) 14:34, 9 August 2009 (UTC) Neither, given as how more recent studies shows that Eoentelodon has is distinct from Brachyhyops, and is apparently more closely related to Proentelodon [1]--Mr Fink (talk) 14:41, 9 August 2009 (UTC) Re: Standing rules... Ah fair enough. Well I am no expert in these standing rules so however you think it is appropriate for the article. I guess you can just paste the refs at the end of every paragraph (apart from the fact that they are very similar in wording) to make it look as an inline citation but yeah, however you think is best. Cheers!Calaka (talk) 08:55, 27 August 2009 (UTC) Looking for help re: FSU uniforms http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Florida_State_Seminoles_football#Uniform_Combinations There is debate about whether to show every possible combination of FSU uniforms or just the ones that have been used. Basically this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fsuunis.jpg versus this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ACC-Uniform-combination-FSU.PNG User Kevin W claims that he is seeking "uniformity" with other college football pages that show every possibly combination, without regard for their actual use. I disagree. Why show combinations that have not and will not be used? I remember you being a contributor to the page and I am asking for more input and help as others are now agreeing with me but Kevin won't stop. Thanks. AriGold (talk) Canidae (archived) Extinct ungulates (archived) Proposed deletion of Bethlehem Missionary Baptist Church (Florida) The article Bethlehem Missionary Baptist Church (Florida) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: tagged with reference concerns for months, claims of notability not backed up with citations While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 15:30, 15 November 2009 (UTC) Reminder Hi Noles, Just a reminder that wp: paleontology is for extinct taxon articles to stop at the genus level and for species levels to redirect to the genus. Please merge the information in teh Hipparion species articles you created into the genus page and make the species pages redirects. --Kevmin (talk) 18:42, 21 November 2009 (UTC) Haile Quarry site Hi Noles1984, just wanted to say: I started to italicize all the genus and species names in the list in this new article. However I may not be able to finish doing it, since I have a lot of stuff to do in Real Life and in WikiProject Gastropods. If you have time, you may want to finish italicizing the names yourself. Let me know if you have any trouble working out which names are family names and therefore not italicized (they end in -idae), and so forth. All good wishes, Invertzoo (talk) 23:40, 11 December 2009 (UTC) Geography and ecology of the Everglades Hello. I wrote the above article and I'm noting your edits to it. Two issues concern me. The first is the language bordering on jargon in this passage: the Florida peninsula was a shallow eutropical subsea known as the Dade Subsea, the first of many subseas of the Oligocene Okeechobean Sea. For readers unfamiliar with geology (and I count myself among them), this statement has very little meaning. I am not afraid of being technical, but is there a way we can work to make this relevant to casual readers? Before the edit it read the Florida peninsula was a shallow sea floor. Noting that "sea" is used four times in what replaced it (Tony1's head would explode if he read it), there must be a bridge between "sea floor" and the linking of eutropical subsea. The second issue is the removal of cited content (well, and the fact that the above is not cited) in the sentence The peninsula has been covered by sea water at least seven times since the earliest bedrock formation. Why reason do you have of taking this out? It is a very reliable source. Thank you. --Moni3 (talk) 21:29, 5 January 2010 (UTC) Hi. You removed cited information in the Everglades article without an explanation. You inserted a sentence about the Hawthorne Formation in the Geography and ecology of the Everglades article with an incomplete citation. I have reverted both edits because these are GA and FA class articles, respectively, and your edits do not seem to improve the quality of the articles. The Everglades article has the more in-depth discussion about the geology underneath the Everglades, where all five geologic formations that comprise the southern tip of the Florida peninsula are included. A link in the Geography and ecology of the Everglades article directs interested readers to this section. It is perplexing why only the Hawthorne Formation would be discussed (in the Geology and ecology of the Everglades article where only a brief summary of geologic issues exists) when other formations such as the Miami Limestone and the Fort Thompson Formation affect the soil and plant life of the Everglades more profoundly. I am not trying to own these articles, but maintain them with very high standards. Communicating what you are trying to achieve would be helpful. I am not opposing incorporating new or different information as long as it is well-cited and reliable and adds to the overall comprehensiveness of the articles. --Moni3 (talk) 17:57, 9 January 2010 (UTC) FSU Disambiguation Page Hello - This ongoing discussion may interest you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:FSU —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.254.7.36 (talk) 19:19, 16 March 2010 (UTC) Tallahassee Consolidation userbox Hope you don't mind if I pinch this one to put on my page too. :) - The Bushranger (talk) 21:19, 22 March 2010 (UTC) Cool, thanks. I tweaked it a little to add the Tallahasse flag, that version's here if you want. :) - The Bushranger (talk) 20:36, 29 March 2010 (UTC) Lake Iamonia picture The picture - Lake Iamonia gallery004 boat ramp.jpg - is that on the north side? It looks like Bull Headley Landing to me? - The Bushranger (talk) 03:42, 4 April 2010 (UTC) Cool. Always neat to recognise the location in a pic! - The Bushranger (talk) 17:54, 4 April 2010 (UTC) File:Lake Monkey Business.png missing description details Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Lake Monkey Business.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Haruth (talk) 15:32, 16 April 2010 (UTC) File source problem with File:Chaires High School2 rc05541.jpg Thank you for uploading File:Chaires High School2 rc05541.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged. If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:29, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:29, 1 May 2010 (UTC) Your sandbox Could you remove the categories from your sandbox? I was cleaning up a category and noticed that your sandbox is listed in the category. Thanks. 71.77.20.119 (talk) 17:37, 2 May 2010 (UTC) The ones I see are "United States Senate" and "Parliamentary procedure". 71.77.20.119 (talk) 17:47, 2 May 2010 (UTC) File copyright problem with File:San_Luis_Marker.jpg Thank you for uploading File:San_Luis_Marker.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:27, 8 May 2010 (UTC) File copyright problem with File:Tallahassee_Airport_Opening01.jpg Thank you for uploading File:Tallahassee_Airport_Opening01.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:27, 8 May 2010 (UTC) File copyright problem with File:Tallahassee_Regional_Airport_gr0595.jpg Thank you for uploading File:Tallahassee_Regional_Airport_gr0595.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:28, 8 May 2010 (UTC) File copyright problem with File:Tallahassee_Police_Dept_rc03461.jpg Thank you for uploading File:Tallahassee_Police_Dept_rc03461.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:28, 8 May 2010 (UTC) File copyright problem with File:Tallahassee_Florida_pr11216.jpg Thank you for uploading File:Tallahassee_Florida_pr11216.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:15, 9 May 2010 (UTC) File copyright problem with File:Tallahassee_City_Hall_n038810.jpg Thank you for uploading File:Tallahassee_City_Hall_n038810.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:15, 9 May 2010 (UTC) You are now a Reviewer Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC). Wrong edits I think here you added some wrong information to Megantereon. The given source for example des not say, that Megantereon had a fossil range between 10.4 and 1.8 Million years... and that is definitely wrong. So I reverted your edit.--Altaileopard (talk) 20:39, 6 July 2010 (UTC) The oldest fossil evidence I can find is: Asia, Punjab, Pakistan, est. age: 11.61—5.33 Ma. John Finarelli, Ph.D., University of Michigan. March 28, 2002. Europe, Seneze (Domeyrat), France. Est age: 5.33—0.011 Ma. A. Turner, Ph.D., Liverpool John Moores University, H. O'Regan, Ph.D, Sept 6, 2004. N. America, U.S. (Florida). Est age: 7.9—7.8 Ma (Appearance Event Ordination), Nick Pyenson, Ph.D., University of California-Berkely[2] and Mark D. Uhen, Ph.D., George Mason University, [3] Sept. 27, 1993. I believe the specimen from N. America will be the most accurate since it does use the AEO method for more exact dating. Also, why are you using a category inclusion on this discussion page? Noles1984 (talk) 01:56, 8 July 2010 (UTC), Reviewer, TALK TO ME HERE Please give references and not nonsense like this!!! Seneze, where Megantereon (specimen SE311) was indeed found, is a locality of Late Villafrancian age dating to arround 2.2-1.5 Mya! (Christiansen, Adolfssen: Osteology and ecology of Megantereon cultridens SE311 (Mammalia; Felidae; Machairodontinae), a sabrecat from the Late Pliocene – Early Pleistocene of Senéze, France Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2007, Volume 151 Issue 4, Pages 833 - 884) "The earliest presence of Megantereon is recorded at 4·5 Ma in the Bone Valley Formation (Florida), where it is represented by M. cultridens."(Arribas, A., Palmqvist, P., 1999. On the Ecological Connection Between Sabre-tooths and Hominids: Faunal Dispersal Events in the Lower Pleistocene and a Review of the Evidence for the First Human Arrival in Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science 26, 571–585.) The fossils of a cat the Tugen Hills, Kenya (Late Miocene, 5.7 Ma) can probably be identified as Megantereon. The authors write: "If our identification of the tooth as ?Megantereon obscura is correct, it would join Megantereon hesperus from North America (Berta and Galiano, 1983) as the oldest known species in the world."(Morales, J., Pickford, M., Soria, D., 2005. Carnivores from the Late Miocene and Basal Pliocene of the Tugen Hills, Kenia. Revista de la Sociedad Geologica de Espana, 18 (1-2). Megantereon surived in Asia until about 500.000 years ago (Agusti, J., Antón, M., 2002. Mammoths, Sabertooths and Hominids 65 Million Years of Mammalian Evolution in Europe. Columbia University Press, 2002. ISBN 0-231-11640-3) It is very sad, that some people obviously try to waste good time of users... perhaps in order to destroy a projekt.--Altaileopard (talk) 09:40, 8 July 2010 (UTC) and not nonsense like this!!! Whatever links or info you placed on my discussion page was nothing I entered and not my sources. You need to recheck the entries and watch your manners. Again, why are you applying a category to this page? Noles1984 (talk) 23:14, 8 July 2010 (UTC) You gave only some links to university guys. That is not a reference!!!!! --Altaileopard (talk) 23:27, 8 July 2010 (UTC) Those were suggestions not references and I'm not in the habit of doing other people's work. If I get time I'll alter Megantereon. Also, when you communicate you need not use more than one (!) exclamation point. Noles1984 (talk) 23:56, 8 July 2010 (UTC) Wikipedia:Pending changes/Straw poll on interim usage Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:43, 20 September 2010 (UTC) Invitation to join WikiProject United States Hello, Noles1984! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!! --Kumioko (talk) 04:00, 5 January 2011 (UTC) Welcome to the project. --Kumioko (talk) 18:27, 6 January 2011 (UTC) New Years Message for WikiProject United States With the first of what I hope will be monthly newsletters I again want to welcome you to the project and hope that as we all work together through the year we can expand the project, create missing articles and generally improve the pedia thought mutual cooperation and support. Now that we have a project and a solid pool of willing members I wanted to strike while the iron is hot and solicite help in doing a few things that I believe is a good next step in solidifiing the project. I have outlined a few suggestions where you can help with on the projects talk page. This includes but is not limited too updating Portal:United States, assessing the remaining US related articles that haven't been assessed, eliminating the Unrefernced BLP's and others. If you have other suggestions or are interested in doing other things feel free. I just wanted to offer a few suggestions were additional help is needed. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions, comments or suggestions or you can always post something on the projects talk page. If you do not want to recieve a monthly message please put an * before your name on the members page.--Kumioko (talk) 03:53, 12 January 2011 (UTC) New WikiProject United States Newsletter: February 2011 edition Starting with the February 2011 issue WikiProject United States has established a newsletter to inform anyone interested in United States related topics of the latest changes. This newsletter will not only discuss issues relating to WikiProject United States but also: Portal:United States the United States Wikipedians Noticeboard the United States Wikipedians collaboration of the Month - The collaboration article for February is Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and changes to Wikipolicy, events and other things that may be of interest to you. You may read or assist in writing the newsletter, subscribe, unsubscribe or change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you by following this link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page or the Newsletters talk page. --Kumioko (talk) 20:44, 4 February 2011 (UTC) Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled. On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way. For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note. Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:40, 15 March 2011 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of The Blue Buffalo Company If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article. You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles. A tag has been placed on The Blue Buffalo Company, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Phearson (talk) 02:24, 18 March 2011 (UTC) April 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.   --Kumioko (talk) 00:59, 7 April 2011 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Blue Buffalo Company logo.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Blue Buffalo Company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:24, 11 April 2011 (UTC) May 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.   . --Kumioko (talk) 15:46, 6 May 2011 (UTC) File:Ivan Munroe 1961.jpg listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ivan Munroe 1961.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 20:21, 27 May 2011 (UTC) Proposed Image Deletion A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:01, 10 June 2011 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Michigan Tech ath.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Michigan Tech ath.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:47, 11 June 2011 (UTC) June 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States The June 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.   --Kumioko (talk) 22:15, 12 June 2011 (UTC) US National Archives collaboration United States National Archives WikiProject Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the National Archives and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created WP:NARA to launch these efforts. There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please sign up and introduce yourself. Dominic·t 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC) Fair use rationale for File:Horseshoe Plantation pr08630.jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Horseshoe Plantation pr08630.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:42, 23 June 2011 (UTC) Fair use rationale for File:Horseshoe Plantation rc19243.jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Horseshoe Plantation rc19243.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:44, 23 June 2011 (UTC) July 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States The July 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.   --Kumioko (talk) 13:06, 24 July 2011 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Irving Berlin (editor) The article Irving Berlin (editor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Unsourced BLP. One uncredited acting role and while he may have had a significant career as an editor, film and tv editors generally get little or no coverage. None was found in this case. While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michig (talk) 06:08, 27 July 2011 (UTC) File:Tallahassee Winter Festival05.jpg listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tallahassee Winter Festival05.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 22:18, 31 July 2011 (UTC) September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.   --Kumioko (talk) 02:50, 6 September 2011 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Magellan Explorer.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Magellan Explorer.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:01, 20 September 2011 (UTC) NRHP Photo Contest Just a reminder that the WP:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Fall 2011 Photo Contest will start on Friday, October 21. Smallbones (talk) 01:58, 18 October 2011 (UTC) Age ranges for extinct cetaceans Hi. I noticed you created or contributed to several articles on extinct cetaceans. You've put that certain genera existed for a certain period of time (e.g. 47-36 mya). Aren't those the estimated dates from the formation they were found in and not the period of time they existed? The sources you cited simply give those age ranges, but didn't specifically say the genera in question existed for say 11 million years. SaberToothedWhale (talk) 21:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC) January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.   --Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 18:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC) File:AmFlag-BetsyRoss.png listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AmFlag-BetsyRoss.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:18, 2 April 2012 (UTC) Non-free rationale for File:The Night Stalker02.jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Night Stalker02.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale. If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:03, 26 June 2012 (UTC) Non-free rationale for File:Tallahassee Fire Department rc00981.jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tallahassee Fire Department rc00981.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale. If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:51, 27 June 2012 (UTC) Non-free rationale for File:The Night Stalker01.jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Night Stalker01.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale. If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:30, 7 July 2012 (UTC) Nomination of AvoDerm for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AvoDerm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AvoDerm until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wkharrisjr (talk) 15:26, 21 August 2012 (UTC) Possibly unfree File:Janice Harsanyi.jpg A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Janice Harsanyi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 06:17, 6 September 2012 (UTC) File permission problem with File:Lake Wawasee Buttermilk Point p0391.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Lake Wawasee Buttermilk Point p0391.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion. If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 03:13, 5 November 2012 (UTC) Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited Seattle Public Library Date Saturday, December 8, 2012 Time 10 a.m. – 3 p.m. Location Seattle Public Library Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104 Event An editathon on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand. Hashtag #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki. Registration http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com or use on-wiki regsistration. Yours, Maximilianklein (talk) 03:14, 1 December 2012 (UTC) Non-free use of File:Leon High School rc00665.jpg Thank you for uploading File:Leon High School rc00665.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself. An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. I've noted that a similar upload is tagged as public domain. Could this be re-tagged also to sidestep the NFCC issue? CT Cooper · talk 22:37, 2 January 2013 (UTC) Replaceable fair use File:Harri Hursti.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Harri Hursti.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please: Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 06:46, 23 January 2013 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (File:Magnolia Florida Cemetery rc13818.jpg) Thanks for uploading File:Magnolia Florida Cemetery rc13818.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:09, 2 February 2013 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (File:Fromm Family logo.png) Thanks for uploading File:Fromm Family logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 20 February 2013 (UTC) Nomination of Diamond Pet Foods for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diamond Pet Foods is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamond Pet Foods until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:56, 22 April 2013 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (File:Diamond Pet Foods.png) Thanks for uploading File:Diamond Pet Foods.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 2 May 2013 (UTC) Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library! World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you! Hi Noles1984! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 22:28, 22 May 2013 (UTC) Non-free use disputed for File:Joseph_Chaires_Grave01.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Joseph_Chaires_Grave01.jpg. Unfortunately, I think that you have not provided a proper rationale for using this image under "fair use". Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. Note that the image description page must include the exact name or a link to each article the image is used in and a separate rationale for each one. (If a link is used, automated processes may improperly add the related tag to the image. Please change the fair use template to refer to the exact name, if you see this warning.) If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 19:08, 24 May 2013 (UTC) Possibly unfree File:Bull Run Plantation rk0667.jpg A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bull Run Plantation rk0667.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 19:25, 24 May 2013 (UTC) Possibly unfree File:Bull Run Plantation rk0665.jpg A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bull Run Plantation rk0665.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 19:27, 24 May 2013 (UTC) File:Blakely Plantation House.jpg listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blakely Plantation House.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 13:49, 25 May 2013 (UTC) Invitation to a Wicnic in Gainesville on Saturday, June 22nd Greetings! Seeing that you're a member of WikiProject Florida, on the off chance you're in our neck of the woods, I'm inviting you to the North Central Florida 2013 Great American Wiknic that will be on Saturday June 22, 2013, commencing at 1:00 pm, ten blocks north of UF campus in Gainesville. If you're able and inclined to come, please RSVP at at this URL. Type to you later, Vincent J. Lipsio (talk) 13:00, 2 June 2013 (UTC) Possibly unfree File:Dale Mabry Experimental 1946.jpg A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dale Mabry Experimental 1946.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:33, 15 October 2013 (UTC) File:Xeriscape03.png listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Xeriscape03.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  17:40, 15 November 2013 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lake Wawasee Buttermilk Point p0391.jpg A tag has been placed on File:Lake Wawasee Buttermilk Point p0391.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [4], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then: state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions. add the relevant copyright tag. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. January (talk) 17:13, 11 March 2014 (UTC) Notification of automated file description generation Your upload of File:Cape St George Island Fl.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page. This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC) Another one of your uploads, File:Capital Cascades Greenway.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:06, 12 March 2014 (UTC) Another one of your uploads, File:Chaires Florida Map01.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:07, 20 April 2014 (UTC) Files listed for deletion Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 July 30 if you are interested in preserving them. File:Remingtonocetus.jpg File:Kutchicetus.png Thank you. IJReid (talk) 04:24, 30 July 2014 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lake Wawasee South Shore Inn 3094.jpg A tag has been placed on File:Lake Wawasee South Shore Inn 3094.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [5], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then: state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions. add the relevant copyright tag. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kelly hi! 08:24, 13 October 2014 (UTC) Possibly unfree File:Bradleys Country Store.jpg A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bradleys Country Store.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:26, 13 October 2014 (UTC) File:NETSCAPE USER.gif listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NETSCAPE USER.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:29, 13 October 2014 (UTC) File:James Kirksey House.jpg listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:James Kirksey House.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:32, 13 October 2014 (UTC) File:Benjamin Chaires House.jpg listed for deletion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Benjamin Chaires House.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:33, 13 October 2014 (UTC) File permission problem with File:San Luis Marker.jpg Thanks for uploading File:San Luis Marker.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion. If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:37, 13 October 2014 (UTC) File permission problem with File:Tallahassee Regional Airport gr0595.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Tallahassee Regional Airport gr0595.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion. If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:40, 13 October 2014 (UTC) File permission problem with File:Panhead-Catahoulas-Busch-and-9pups.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Panhead-Catahoulas-Busch-and-9pups.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion. If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:41, 13 October 2014 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lake Wawasee South Shore Inn 7400.jpg A tag has been placed on File:Lake Wawasee South Shore Inn 7400.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [6], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then: state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions. add the relevant copyright tag. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kelly hi! 08:50, 13 October 2014 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lake Wawasee South Shore Inn 7474.jpg A tag has been placed on File:Lake Wawasee South Shore Inn 7474.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [7], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then: state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions. add the relevant copyright tag. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kelly hi! 08:50, 13 October 2014 (UTC) File permission problem with File:Lake Wawasee Vawter Park Hotel.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Lake Wawasee Vawter Park Hotel.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion. If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:51, 13 October 2014 (UTC) Possibly unfree File:Lake Wawasee Vawter Park Hotel.jpg A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lake Wawasee Vawter Park Hotel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly hi! 07:21, 23 October 2014 (UTC) Possibly unfree File:San Luis Marker.jpg A file that you uploaded or altered, File:San Luis Marker.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:04, 23 October 2014 (UTC) Possibly unfree File:Tallahassee Regional Airport gr0595.jpg A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tallahassee Regional Airport gr0595.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:04, 23 October 2014 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Advanced Bus Industries The article Advanced Bus Industries has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Company does not seem to exist, if it does it is not Notable While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David chamberlain (talk) 16:18, 30 December 2014 (UTC) Global account Hi Noles1984! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:24, 18 January 2015 (UTC) Clarification? Hello, I am thinking about expanding the article Amphechinus which you worked on in the past. With this edit, you added a reference that appears to be about a different animal, Batodonoides vanhouteni. I wanted to check with you before deleting the information. thanks --Gaff (talk) 04:20, 31 January 2015 (UTC) Leon County Plantations info Hello Noles1984, as a fellow Leon County resident I am interested in the history of our county especially early plantation maps and locations. I noticed you created/added the maps on the locations of Leon County plantations and was wondering what book or map you based these locations off? I would love to take a look at such documentation especially maps. Dero316 (talk) 21:02, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Dero316 Nomination of AvoDerm for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AvoDerm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AvoDerm (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:02, 10 May 2015 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:By Nature logo.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:By Nature logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 8 July 2015 (UTC) ArbCom elections are now open! Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Rose Hill Plantation The article Rose Hill Plantation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: No assertion of notability in article. None of the links seem to mention this place. Might be a case for an article on Ralph Nicholson though. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LionMans Account (talk) 03:03, 2 December 2015 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Natural Balance logo.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Natural Balance logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 16 April 2016 (UTC) File permission problem with File:Bradfordville Florida Green Johnson.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Bradfordville Florida Green Johnson.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion. If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:39, 17 May 2016 (UTC) File:Cape San Blas.png listed for discussion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cape San Blas.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC) File permission problem with File:Eli Lilly Industrialist.jpg Thanks for uploading File:Eli Lilly Industrialist.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion. If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 10:25, 21 July 2016 (UTC) Nomination of Leon County Sheriff's Office (Florida) for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leon County Sheriff's Office (Florida) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leon County Sheriff's Office (Florida) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 06:45, 28 July 2016 (UTC) File:Eli Lilly Industrialist.jpg listed for discussion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Eli Lilly Industrialist.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:07, 29 July 2016 (UTC) Nomination of Florida Capitol Police for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Florida Capitol Police is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florida Capitol Police until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 06:50, 18 August 2016 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Kawasaki logo 1961-1967.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Kawasaki logo 1961-1967.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:02, 26 September 2016 (UTC) Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Wakulla Springs n041871.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Wakulla Springs n041871.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 15 November 2016 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Otokar Logo.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Otokar Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Artemis Pet Foods.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Artemis Pet Foods.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 23 January 2017 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Artemis product.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Artemis product.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 23 January 2017 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:NARAL logo.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:NARAL logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC) File:Beloit College FB.png listed for discussion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Beloit College FB.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 21 March 2017 (UTC) File:Lawton High Helmet.png listed for discussion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lawton High Helmet.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Also: File:Leon High Helmet.png File:Ripon College FB.png ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 23 April 2017 (UTC) File permission problem with File:StarMetro Gillig Front View.jpg Thanks for uploading File:StarMetro Gillig Front View.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion. If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Also: File:StarMetro Gillig FSU.jpg File:StarMetro Interior Closeup.jpg File:StarMetro Parade Bus01.jpg File:StarMetro TMC RTS 40.jpg ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 24 April 2017 (UTC) File source problem with File:Chaires High School rc05542.jpg Thank you for uploading File:Chaires High School rc05542.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Also: File:Map-Leon-Tall-Timbers.png File:US cretaceous general.png ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 24 April 2017 (UTC) File permission problem with File:StarMetro Gillig BRT 40.jpg Thanks for uploading File:StarMetro Gillig BRT 40.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion. If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Also: File:StarMetro Gillig Interior.jpg File:StarMetro New Flyer DL 40 Low Floor.jpg File:StarMetro Parade Bus.jpg File:StarMetro Parade Bus02.jpg ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 25 April 2017 (UTC) File source problem with File:Surficial Aquifer.gif Thank you for uploading File:Surficial Aquifer.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Also: File:Water Oak Plantation Artifact.jpg ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 25 April 2017 (UTC) File source problem with File:Tallahassee Ship Drawing.jpg Thank you for uploading File:Tallahassee Ship Drawing.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 5 May 2017 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Dale Mabry Field 1943 n044874.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Dale Mabry Field 1943 n044874.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 24 May 2017 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Dale Mabry Field n044871.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Dale Mabry Field n044871.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC) Proposed deletion of By Nature The article By Nature has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Non-notable brand. Can only locate one review that I would consider a WP:RS (from dogfoodadvisor.com and I would only call them RS because they have an editorial policy/disclaimer). All other Ghits are non-reliable websites that copypaste company info and add SEO about possible recalls to obtain hits. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 17:15, 28 May 2017 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of By Nature If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article. You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles. A tag has been placed on By Nature, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mean as custard (talk) 12:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Passion quotient The article Passion quotient has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Unsourced for 7 years. No evidence of notability. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 09:03, 3 August 2017 (UTC) Women in Red World Contest Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale! Proposed deletion of WCOT (Tallahassee) The article WCOT (Tallahassee) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Fails WP:GNG & WP:BROADCAST While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 02:52, 7 March 2018 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:WCOT-Tallahassee.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:WCOT-Tallahassee.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Rusf10 (talk) 23:47, 14 March 2018 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Addiction Foods If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article. You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles. A tag has been placed on Addiction Foods requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lyndaship (talk) 19:52, 4 May 2018 (UTC) Deletion discussion about The Chaires School Hello, Noles1984, I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether The Chaires School should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chaires School . If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:00, 14 May 2018 (UTC) File:Woodville Karst geo.png listed for discussion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Woodville Karst geo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:54, 3 July 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule I The article Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule I has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crazynas t 02:51, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule II The article Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule II has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crazynas t 02:51, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule III The article Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule III has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crazynas t 02:51, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule IV The article Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule IV has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crazynas t 02:52, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule V The article Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule V has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crazynas t 02:52, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule VI The article Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule VI has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crazynas t 02:52, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule VII The article Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule VII has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crazynas t 02:52, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule IX The article Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule IX has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crazynas t 02:55, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule X The article Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule X has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crazynas t 02:55, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XI The article Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XI has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crazynas t 02:55, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XIII The article Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XIII has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crazynas t 02:56, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XII The article Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XII has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crazynas t 02:56, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule VIII The article Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule VIII has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crazynas t 02:56, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XVI The article Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XVI has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crazynas t 02:56, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XIV The article Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XIV has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crazynas t 02:56, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XV The article Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XV has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crazynas t 02:57, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XVII The article Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XVII has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crazynas t 02:57, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XVIII The article Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XVIII has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crazynas t 02:57, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XX The article Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XX has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crazynas t 02:58, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XXI The article Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XXI has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crazynas t 02:58, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XXII The article Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XXII has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crazynas t 02:58, 20 November 2018 (UTC) Merger discussion for Kawasaki motorcycles An article that you have been involved in editing—Kawasaki motorcycles—has been proposed for merging with Kawasaki Heavy Industries Motorcycle & Engine. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 21:56, 25 December 2018 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Susan Bernecker The article Susan Bernecker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Fails WP:NPOL. Failed candidate for New Orleans City Council. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GPL93 (talk) 19:26, 4 April 2019 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Springtime Tallahassee logo.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Springtime Tallahassee logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 5 July 2019 (UTC) Nomination of Catahoula bulldog for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Catahoula bulldog is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catahoula bulldog until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Atsme Talk 📧 12:41, 6 August 2019 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:E One logo.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:E One logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 31 August 2019 (UTC) "Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule I" listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule I. Since you had some involvement with the Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule I redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Mdewman6 (talk) 17:33, 5 October 2019 (UTC) "Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule II" listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule II. Since you had some involvement with the Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule II redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Mdewman6 (talk) 17:34, 5 October 2019 (UTC) "Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule III" listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule III. Since you had some involvement with the Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule III redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:11, 5 October 2019 (UTC) "Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule IV" listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule IV. Since you had some involvement with the Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule IV redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:11, 5 October 2019 (UTC) "Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule V" listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule V. Since you had some involvement with the Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule V redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:12, 5 October 2019 (UTC) "Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule VI" listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule VI. Since you had some involvement with the Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule VI redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:12, 5 October 2019 (UTC) "Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule VIII" listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule VIII. Since you had some involvement with the Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule VIII redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:13, 5 October 2019 (UTC) "Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule IX" listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule IX. Since you had some involvement with the Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule IX redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC) "Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule X" listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule X. Since you had some involvement with the Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule X redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:15, 5 October 2019 (UTC) "Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XI" listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XI. Since you had some involvement with the Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XI redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:15, 5 October 2019 (UTC) "Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XII" listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XII. Since you had some involvement with the Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XII redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:16, 5 October 2019 (UTC) "Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XIII" listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XIII. Since you had some involvement with the Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XIII redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:17, 5 October 2019 (UTC) "Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XIV" listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XIV. Since you had some involvement with the Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XIV redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:18, 5 October 2019 (UTC) "Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XV" listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XV. Since you had some involvement with the Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XV redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:18, 5 October 2019 (UTC) "Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XVI" listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XVI. Since you had some involvement with the Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XVI redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:19, 5 October 2019 (UTC) "Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XVII" listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XVII. Since you had some involvement with the Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XVII redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:20, 5 October 2019 (UTC) "Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XVIII" listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XVIII. Since you had some involvement with the Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XVIII redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:20, 5 October 2019 (UTC) "Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XX" listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XX. Since you had some involvement with the Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XX redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:22, 5 October 2019 (UTC) "Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XXII" listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XXII. Since you had some involvement with the Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule XXII redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:23, 5 October 2019 (UTC) Grand Beach Map It would be nice to have a point on a map of Manitoba for Grand Beach (Manitoba) article. I saw that you had done one for Winnipeg Beach in 2006 at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winnipeg_Beach#/media/File:Winnipeg_Beach_Map.png I don't know how this was originally done and I think you'd be the one to do such a thing to improve the Grand Beach, Manitoba article. Jimj wpg (talk) 01:57, 20 December 2019 (UTC) Nomination of S. John Launer for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article S. John Launer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. John Launer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:56, 22 January 2020 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Tree Line USA The article Tree Line USA has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: No footnotes, undersourced since creation in 2006. No indication fulfills WP:GNG While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Loksmythe (talk) 00:08, 23 April 2020 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Tree Line USA If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article. You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles. A tag has been placed on Tree Line USA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.arborday.org/programs/treelineusa/summary.cfm and and its subpages. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DGG ( talk ) 23:36, 29 April 2020 (UTC) Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Bellevue Plantation House.jpg Thank you for uploading File:Bellevue Plantation House.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:21, 13 May 2020 (UTC) Nomination of Bradfordville School for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bradfordville School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradfordville School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 18:33, 7 June 2020 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Winter Festival (Tallahassee, Florida) The article Winter Festival (Tallahassee, Florida) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Non notable local festival, no reliable, substantial, secondary sources available, violates WP:GNG and WP:ROUTINE While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 11:13, 10 August 2020 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Winter Festival.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Winter Festival.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:53, 19 August 2020 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Rhythm in a Riff The article Rhythm in a Riff has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Fails the requirements of WP:NFILM. The first cited reference is a mention in passing. The Library of Congress confirms the film’s existence but doesn’t qualify for automatic notability. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 14:42, 7 September 2020 (UTC) Nomination of Rhythm in a Riff for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rhythm in a Riff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhythm in a Riff until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 05:02, 8 September 2020 (UTC) Nomination of Tallahassee in popular culture for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tallahassee in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tallahassee in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:08, 19 April 2021 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Kibbles n Bits logo.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Kibbles n Bits logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 5 August 2021 (UTC) Two Woodlawns? Hi, Noles, and thanks for your work on Leon County history. Just discovered there are articles for Woodlawn (Leon County) (a plantation) and Woodlawn Plantation (Florida) (a Leon County plantation). Do these refer to the same plantation? If not, how do we make the distinction between them clear? I want to make sure I just linked to the right one. (I live in Birmingham AL but come from Red Hills people in Florida and Georgia. Just visited Tall Timbers for the first time last month. Since then I've noticed that you started all of the Wikipedia articles that most interest me lately.) — ℜob C. alias ALAROB 16:21, 2 September 2021 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Ali Haghighi The article Ali Haghighi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Failed WP:SIGCOV. No actually references. Refs are for product, primary. Been on the cat:nn list since 2010. No coverage. Fails WP:BIO. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creepTalk 23:00, 11 May 2022 (UTC) Nomination of Eutropical subsea for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eutropical subsea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eutropical subsea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:28, 5 October 2022 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Mickey Andrews The article Mickey Andrews has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:32, 8 April 2023 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Barry University School of Adult and Continuing Education – Tallahassee Campus The article Barry University School of Adult and Continuing Education – Tallahassee Campus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Lacks notability and reliable sources. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ZsinjTalk 23:44, 27 December 2023 (UTC) Nomination of Thomas Dacre (knight) for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Dacre (knight) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Dacre (knight) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. PamD 20:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Tallahassee Fire Department logo.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Tallahassee Fire Department logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Tallahassee Fire Department rc00703.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Tallahassee Fire Department rc00703.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 24 March 2024 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Tallahassee Fire Department rc03441.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Tallahassee Fire Department rc03441.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 24 March 2024 (UTC)