User talk:Noegid

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot[edit]

Hi Noegid! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ryan Vesey (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:43, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Noegid, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Vanjagenije (talk) 22:43, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Noegid. You have new messages at Vanjagenije's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

File permission problem with File:Transition Design Framework.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Transition Design Framework.png, which you've attributed to Prof. T. Irwin, Dr. C. Tonkinwise and Dr. G. Kossoff. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:10, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Noegid. You have new messages at Vanjagenije's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your request for undeletion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Transition_Design_Framework.png. JohnCD (talk) 22:46, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Transition Design[edit]

Dear Noegid, thank you for creating the article.

I've noticed you are relatively new to Wikipedia and that almost all your edits to date have been focused on this one article. Welcome to Wikipedia.

Recently you have reverted [1] my recent edit [2] with your edit summary "Prefer to have weblinks to institution(s) rather than footnotes". Your next edits included [3] and [4].

Your 3 edits have re-added some external links that I have transformed into references/ footnotes. (Your edits also reverted my efforts at improving concision.)

Please note that Wikipedia: External links is a content guideline for editing the encyclopedia. The lead section of the guideline says: "Wikipedia articles may include links to web pages outside Wikipedia (external links), but they should not normally be used in the body of an article." Furthermore, the body of the guideline says: "External links should not normally be used in the body of an article.[1] Instead, include appropriate external links in an "External links" section at the end of the article, and in the appropriate location within an infobox, if applicable."

Please consider revising your edits to follow the guideline. Thanks and regards, IjonTichy (talk) 20:03, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Transition design for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Transition design is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transition design until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:57, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

At the request of another editor, I've moved it to Draft:Transition design. DGG ( talk ) 23:58, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Transition design (August 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The first sections are unsourced and the last 2 suffer from WP:CITEKILL.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Transition design and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl Marcos Rodriguez | t | SPI | AIV | Sandbox | Helpdesk » 20:05, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Transition design concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Transition design, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Transition design[edit]

Hello, Noegid. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Transition design".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:01, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Transition design[edit]

Hello, Noegid. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Transition design".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 09:49, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Transition design[edit]

Hello, Noegid. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Transition design".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 08:44, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]