User talk:Niki1984

Can-Ar[edit]

Can-ar Coach Service uses the Union Station Bus Terminal not the Toronto Coach Terminal. Please do not continue to add information to the wrong article. Secondarywaltz (talk) 14:11, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013[edit]

Please do not add your site to the Bollywood article[edit]

Please stop adding the Bollywood News site to the Bollywood article. It is a low-quality site. I can't figure out whether it is fan site or an attempt to start a commercial site and attract advertising. In either case, the link seems to be self-promotion rather than a sincere attempt to add info to the article. If you persist, you can be banned from editing. Zora (talk) 08:55, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Air pollution. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 13:03, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Water quality, you may be blocked from editing. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 20:36, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that in this edit to Hanuman temple, Salangpur, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA (talk) 09:26, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shared account?[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hanuman_temple,_Salangpur&diff=821414727&oldid=819429139&diffmode=source

"We are going to update complete page"? Are multiple persons using this account? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:14, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hanuman_temple,_Salangpur&diff=prev&oldid=821905355

"We are going to change name here." ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:16, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. What have you done here?!

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hanuman_temple,_Salangpur&type=revision&diff=821905703&oldid=818222804&diffmode=source

~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:15, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Varun Pradip Dave (March 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ts12rAc was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Varun Pradip Dave and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Varun Pradip Dave, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 02:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Niki1984! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 02:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inquiry about your recent edits[edit]

Hi, Niki1984. My name is Tamzin. One thing I do on Wikipedia is look into cases where accounts have behaved in unusual manners. I noticed that you recently made some edits to Draft:Varun Pradip Dave (which has since been deleted), the first edits you had made in several years. Can I ask how you came to find that draft? Do you know any of the other people who had been editing it? Did anyone pay you to edit it? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 02:33, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since you appeat to be ianctive, I'm going to leave you with the following instructions: Please answer the above questions before you resume editing Wikipedia. If you continue to edit without answering these questions, this will be considered a violation of our policy on undisclosed paid editing and your account may be blocked. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 06:49, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:VPD7102001 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VPD7102001. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 20:03, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]