User talk:Nebul2

April 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm McGeddon. Your recent edit to the page Over-the-top content appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 16:37, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SoftAtHome[edit]

The article SoftAtHome has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

17 million device footprint may be a fair claim for notability, but this doesn't meet WP:NCORP without secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 16:38, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think you've misunderstood me - I'm not saying that the 17 million device claim needs to be sourced (although you're right that it does), I'm saying the article needs to be sourced, to show that the company is notable. The fact that the article contained a bold claim about a wide userbase was all that was preventing it being deleted immediately under WP:A7 ("An article about [an organisation] that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant")!

You need to dig up a few secondary sources to show that this company has received enough press coverage to be considered "notable" by Wikipedia's standards. I'll check back in a day or two, but you may find the article gets deleted in the meantime if it's lacking these sources. --McGeddon (talk) 16:58, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I see where you are coming from. I will try to address this then.

Have just taken a closer look at the article and - my mistake - you had provided references, I just didn't notice them because they were all inline links. I've reformatted them to appear as references, so that should be fine now. --McGeddon (talk) 17:04, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks appreciate the guidance.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ultra HD Forum (October 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of websites and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ultra HD Forum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nebul2, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ultra HD Forum[edit]

Hello, Nebul2. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Ultra HD Forum".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 04:43, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]