User talk:Mr. Lefty/Archive1

This page is an archive. To leave me a new message, go to User talk:Mr. Lefty.

Image copyright problem with Image:Logan1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Logan1.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 10:59, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Blocking

My IP address is (censored, hackers!). If that could be unblocked, that would be greatly appreciated. Apparently, someone has used this IP address under an inappropriate user name, and as such, the IP address has also been blocked indefinitely. This is incredibly annoying. If an administrator could resolve this problem, then that would be great. Thanks. Mr. Lefty 22:05, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

I can't find you in the block logs at all. Mike _{(T C)} 06:07, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

I have blocked you for one second, to see if that causes you to be unblocked. Please test it. Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 16:05, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Sam, he wanted his IP unblocked, not his username. His IP was blocked on March 15 for 31 hours for vandalism [1]. It has been more than 31 hours now so it should now work! --M@thwiz2020 16:29, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I realise. I just can't read dates. Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 18:35, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Okay, folks, everything's alright now. I think I didn't make it very clear: someone with an inappropriate user name (Mr. Feces, I think it was) was using this IP and got blocked, and I wanted it to be unblocked, since I am obviously not Mr. Feces. Sorry for not clearing that up. But, I'm unblocked now, so it's okay. Mr. Lefty 18:39, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

You okay?

Hey, I saw you made some edits to wikiproject nintendo and then deleted them, you okay? Hope you're well and cheers, Highway ^{Rainbow Sneakers} 21:25, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Ah, it's okay. It'd be great if you could edit them anyway, that's the idea! Cheers, Highway ^{Rainbow Sneakers} 22:56, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

REPLY

im sorry i forgot to delete the other users name and put my name instead REPLY: thats ok i am a user but i always forgets to log in!

Heh

Thanks for the laughs on sandbox.--Cini 21:54, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Already using MrLefty

Um, I've been using MrLefty here for a year or so, and on my blog [2]. Actually, I screwed up the login and am on as both MrLefty and Mrlefty (I don't know how to recombine the two), but it's going to be even more confusing if there's also a Mr. space Lefty. Mrlefty 21:33, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Dirtychild.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dirtychild.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:04, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

May the Force be with you.

Dear Mr. Lefty/Archive1,

Thanks for voting on my RFA! I appreciate your faith in me, and was overwhelmed by the positive response to my RFA; for it shows that at least I'm doing something right. :) I've started working to improve myself already, and I hope that next time, things run better, and maybe, just maybe, one day we can bask on the shores of Admintopia together. Thanks and cheers, _-M o P-_ 21:56, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Signatures

I see you've been experimenting with signatures. If you want to use custom signatures (like mine), you should check the "Raw signature" box to make your tags work.—G.He 02:36, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Talk Page

Thank you for experimenting with the 138.38.32.84 talk page, but I'm afraid the same goes for you as I responded to Naconkantari and I must ask you not to vandalise. Thanks. 138.38.32.84 17:55, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

thanks

Hey - thanks for the tip! Rama's Arrow 19:32, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Esperanza Newsletter, Issue #3

Administrator Coaching The Administrator Coaching program is a program aimed at preparing Wikipedians for Adminship or helping them understand the intricacies of Wikipedia better. Recently, changes have been made to the requirements of coachees. Please review them before requesting this service. This would be something like the Welcoming Committee, but for people who have figured out the basics of editing articles; they're not newcomers any more, but they might want some help in learning new roles. Some might like suggestions about how to learn vandal patrol, or mentoring on taking an article to featured status, or guidance with a proposal they plan to make at the Village Pump, for example. In this way, Esperanza would help keep hope alive for Wikipedia because we would always be grooming the next generation of admins. Stressbusters The Stressbusters are a subset of Esperanza aiming to investigate the causes of stress. New eyes on the situation are always welcome! Note from the editor As always, MiszaBot handled this delivery. Thank you! Also, congratulations go to Pschemp, Titoxd and Freakofnurture for being elected in the last elections! An Esperanzial May to all of the readership!

The last AC meeting (full log) Posting logs of the Esperanza IRC channel are explicitly banned anywhere. Violation of this rule results in deletion and a ban from the channel. A disclaimer is going to be added to the Esperanza main page. We are humans and, as such, are imperfect. Various revisions have been made to the Code of Conduct. Please see them, as the proposal is ready to be ratified by the community and enacted. All members will members to have to re-confirm their membership after accepting the Code of Conduct. Referendums are to be held on whether terms of AC members should be lengthened and whether we should abolish votes full stop. Admin Coaching reform is agreed upon. Signed... Celestianpower, JoanneB, Titoxd, Pschemp and Freakofnurture 20:29, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Mr. Lefty! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. AmiDaniel (talk) 01:12, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Doug Copp

I saw that you recently reverted an inappropriate edit on the above article. Doug Copp himself is now on Wiki and I expect there will be a lot of disputable edits by him on his bio as well as on his Triangle of Life soon. Please do keep a watchful eye on these two articles! --rxnd ( t | € | c ) 19:02, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

May 2006

Hello, I received a message from you recently regarding an edit I made to the Lacus Clyne Page. I did not Remove anything, I merely re-arranged the posititions of the pictures to make them flow better with the text. If you think it looks fine the way it originally was, I can appreciate and understand that, however please don't accuse me of purging content when I did no such thing. --71.12.221.109 22:20, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

The Removalists

Hey I think you may have made a mistake here! [3] Ok bye. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 00:48, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Yep, you were right, I have poor reverting skills. :) I guess I'll need to be more careful and make sure I revert everything next time. Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 00:51, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Well it's the thought that counts, right? ;) --M1ss1ontomars2k4 00:52, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Hello how are you? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.241.152.106 (talk • contribs) .

Thanks

...for fixing my novice redirect error on Naked Trucker so quickly. --Wesley Biggs 01:47, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

New Message

I am receiving new messages saying that I vandalize pages. But I never did any of that. Next, I don't know Eddy Guerero and they say I changed that page. What is going on? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.94.85.71 (talk • contribs) .

Question

I noticed that edit you made on my userpage. I don't mind that you "vandalized" it but the picture is a little too much (I'm only 13.) Do you mind if I remove it? Sorry for any inconveniences and other things like that. --Evan Robidoux 02:06, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

OK, but if you remove it though, then don't get rid of the "Muhahaha" part. I don't mind that. --Evan Robidoux 02:09, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

I know

It says that many people use the same ip account. That means someone has mine, too. They can edit something and I can be affected, too, right? If that's the case, as written in the italic at the bottom of my every message, you can't just accuse me of doing something I didn't do.

Sandbox

Is it really necessary to test that specific picture?...—G.He 02:42, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

"Ceiling cat" picture?... I'm quite sure I don't want to know what that is...—G.He 02:44, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

That's not that bad...—G.He 02:48, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Re: Personal Vandalism

No problem. It happened to me several times too.—G.He 03:58, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

No problem :)--Shanel ^§ 04:07, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Mr. Lefty/My Talk

Forging another user's signature is a blockable offense. Please don't do it again. User:Zoe|^(talk) 22:08, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

To those reading this so you don't get the wrong idea: I made a joke page saying that the person who clicked on it had been permanently blocked and I signed it by Jimbo Wales. I realize this was probably a dumb thing to do, and I apologize for any trouble, but just understand that it was all in good fun. Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 15:55, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

OK. Just don't make a habit of it. :) User:Zoe|^(talk) 20:27, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi lefty. Yes! I was using wikipedia to research porn. I'm interested to know if there have been any non-commerical online communities that compile porn. Call me a "dirty child" if you must, but wikipedia wasn't helpful in finding the information. --William sharkey 01:06, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

My name

Hello Mr. Lefty. I already replied to your message on my discussion page, but then realized it would make a lot more sense to add my reply on your discussion page, because then you'd notice it faster (silly me). So here it is again: No, I chose it on purpose. A bit childish, I know, but I don't see a major problem with it. If Wikipedia blocks it they're far more childish. Jerkov 18:52, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Smile :)

—G.He has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk pages. Happy editing!

—G.He 23:11, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Willy on Wheels

I'm just giving a possibility: Is there by any chance a possibility that Willy on wheels is spambots?

I'm sorry

I'm so sorry Mr. Lefty. I'm new on the editing/adding things to wikipedia. I tried to cleared some facts that I thought were wrong. I promise I'll be more careful. I won't delete anythign again. I'll just keep on adding facts to pages like I used to. Please don't block me. --Bella.roza

VandalProof 1.2 Now Available

After a lenghty, but much-needed Wikibreak, I'm happy to announce that version 1.2 of VandalProof is now available for download! Beyond fixing some of the most obnoxious bugs, like the persistent crash on start-up that many have experienced, version 1.2 also offers a wide variety of new features, including a stub-sorter, a global user whitelist and blacklist, navigational controls, and greater customization. You can find a full list of the new features here. While I believe this release to be a significant improvement over the last, it's nonetheless nowhere near the end of the line for VandalProof. Thanks to Rob Church, I now have an account on test.wikipedia.org with SysOp rights and have already been hard at work incorporating administrative tools into VandalProof, which I plan to make available in the near future. An example of one such SysOp tool that I'm working on incorporating is my simple history merge tool, which simplifies the process of performing history merges from one article into another. Anyway, if you haven't already, I'd encourage you to download and install version 1.2 and take it out for a test-drive. As always, your suggestions for improvement are always appreciated, and I hope that you will find this new version useful. Happy editing! --AmiDaniel (talk) 02:57, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

I'm the one who left you an apology about vandalism and not blocking me.

I deleted some (lots) of info on the Opus Dei page. Again I'm so sorry about. I hope I won't need to change/delete anything. If I ever feel the need. I'll be sure to use the Talk Page. BTW can you send me the link to that page. This system is really confusing to me.

Thanks for taking your time to answer me !

--Bella.roza

drat!!

I fell for you "new message" trick! Gah! --Quadalpha 04:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

i didnt do it

Mail Order Bride

Hello Mr. Lefty;

I have asked wikipedia for arbitration for this issue. Everything I have put in the article has been repeatedly deleted and the entire article has become an artcle about abuse rather than about mail order brides. The other "editor" keeps pushing the abuse and "gay mail order brides" agendas. I would ask that you review what I have written and what they have written with a fair mind and tell me who is pushing a POV. I have repeatedlt tried to include everyone's ideas, but mine keep getting deleted no matter how relevent and fact based they are. For example, lok at the whole demographics issue. How is that irrelevent when the so-called gay mail order brides is. Come on here. This is supposed to be an article about mail order brides, not gay mail order brides or abuse of mail order brides. Please help me out here. Thanks. Michaellovesnyc 01:40, 1 June 2006 (UTC) michaellovesnyc

Vandalism.

Daniel5127 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

, Thanks you for catching vandalism on my user page. It was about before 2 weeks ago. Sorry, I forgot to say Thanks you. I'm so lazy to send them thank you message. I know you do great job in Wikipedia such as fight with vandals. Anyways, Cheers~~!! Hope you could send me message. Daniel5127, 03:01, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

i guess it was not obvious, but i am fallerd, and i'd just left random nonsense in my talk page quite awhile ago, and i decided to remove it - if you'd like me to login to verify, i'd be happy to. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fallerd (talk • contribs) .

Wikipedian's ID.

I have been confused between your ID(Mr. Lefty), and other wikipedian's ID(Mrlefty). So, I personally consider that Mrlefty impersonated your ID. Ahh, I also gave you big smile. Sorry for bothering you about ID issue. Anyways, You must send me message. '''*Daniel*''' 23:45, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Image.

I just saw the cat picture on this user:User:Freakofnurture's page. What does the cat picture represent for? Please, reply in my talk page, and explain about Cat Picture. Thanks. '''*Daniel*''' 23:47, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

question about Username

DANGER Blanking or vandalising this page can be dangerous. 1,568,091 users are currently banned because of this page. If you are new and are mortally offended by these blatant lies, check out Wikipedia:Introduction.

3 things actually:

1. Am I correct in understanding that you changed your Udername here? How can I do that my self?
2. There is a post mew messages here on your talk page. I've noticed it on others. Where are the instructions for setting one up?
3. I noted the above notice on your Userpage. Are you serious?

-- Jason Palpatine 00:35, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Do you seriously have Pelswick on popups?

Thanks

Thanks for the revert to my user page, there's some nasty people around here :S -Benbread 22:11, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Editcount

Here it is:

• See Mr. Lefty's _{(Talk ▪ Contributions ▪ Logs ▪ Block Logs)} contributions as of 01:25, 5 June 2006 (UTC) using Interiot's tool:

Username	Mr. Lefty
Total edits	1559
Distinct pages edited	1119
Average edits/page	1.393
First edit	23:45, January 25, 2006
	
(main)	681
Talk	18
User	103
User talk	541
Image	3
Template	5
Template talk	3
Wikipedia	202
Wikipedia talk	3

 G.He 01:25, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

User page

Please do not put confusing messages on your user page. How can I tell it's not a real messages warning?? Georgia guy 01:47, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

User RfC - your contribution requested

You previously commented about User:Michaellovesnyc's edits to Mail-order bride, in the mediation cabal as well as on his talk page. Thanks for the help. I've now begun drafting a user RfC against him; it's here. To make it into a stronger case when it is submitted to mediation, please help edit it and add evidence about the problem and how you've helped try to solve it. There has been little discussion between the editors involved in this dispute, so it's difficult for any one person to do it alone. I'd really appreciate your help--I hope one day we can get this article up to a much higher standard. --Grace 02:26, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

New vandalism by User:58.160.194.19

This guy struck again at Opus Dei: User talk:58.160.194.19

He's yours! :) Anonimus 02:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Please read...

What do you want to talk about

What? Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 17:49, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Message

DFSDF

SDF SD F

What do you think about elephants?

Hey there

Thanks for commenting on my RfA...it was greatly appreciated! --Osbus 21:34, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. Nephron  T|C 06:21, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

FOOL

Hey best friend! =D

Merger is a go

The Character list merger is a great idea but could you just merge the nintendo 64 and melee characters, and brawl fighters into 1 article instead of 3

Mail Order Bride

Michaellovesnyc 02:46, 8 June 2006 (UTC) michaellovesnyc Hey Mr. Lefty; why do you feel that my version is "awfully complex and text-heavy". My opponent goes to great lengths with several pages to exaggerate and shamelessly distort the deaths of 3 women who have nothing to do with the general topic of mail order brides. I have proposed that you review my version and my opponents and tell me where you think I am being complex and text heavy and my opponent is not. Which version do you HONESTLY think is more neutral? I think I have been very rational (more than my opponent). I would be happy to listen to what you have to say. My email is michaellovesnyc@aol.com Thank you

Thank you!

For participating in my insane project and surviving, here is a present! Enjoy! Linuxbeak (drop me a line) 01:33, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

aWPThis user survived AntiWikipedia.

I just noticed your newest edit. As incredibly crude as it was, it was funny :-) Linuxbeak (AAAA!) 19:18, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting that image tag back. That user is now wikistalking me and attempting to revert all of my recent edits in order to seek revenge on me for that dispute. --Strothra 16:23, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Oh please. If I was "wikistalking you", I would have reverted a lot more than the few arab related articles that I disagree with you on- I would say YOU are the one "stalking" me, given that you've been consistently levelling juvenile personal attacks at me. Never Cry Wolf 16:25, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the info!

I appreciate the correction about vandalism warnings. As a new Wikipedian, it really helps! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Deriamis (talk • contribs) .

Vandalism?

Sir, You were talking with "Deriamis" about his warning me about 'vandalism?' I do believe WIKIPEDIA allows me to update the Congressman's (or anyones) page and I felt compelled to do so. Deriamis deleted my comments and I replaced them. Where is the vandalism and where on WIKIPEDIA's website does it state that I am not permitted to do so? Please reply, Mythology8