User talk:Mohsinmallik

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Mohsinmallik! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 22:07, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

May 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Small business has been reverted.
Your edit here to Small business was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.100business.blogspot.com) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:07, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013[edit]

Please stop making unnecessary wording changes, like the ones you did at Attack No. 1, PlayStation 3, and others. Your wording is more awkward and sometimes resulted in incorrect and inaccurate statements in articles. Thanks, TheStickMan^[✆Talk] 17:46, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry investigation[edit]

You were named in an investigation for sockpuppetry: See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Misconceptions2. You may want to comment at that page; if you do so, please use the section "Comments by other users". Huon (talk) 06:05, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Whats up[edit]

Please can you finish that article you were creating? --Misconceptions2 (talk) 14:11, 7 October 2014 (UTC) Or I can help you finish it if you want--Misconceptions2 (talk) 14:13, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohsinmallik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet, which account am I even being accused of being a sockpuppet of?? I have never engaged in sockpuppetry or meat puppetry and NO SPI confirmed that I have. I believe it was a hasty block

Decline reason:

While you may not be a sock, your behavior strongly suggests that you are what is known as a meat puppet. This is a term that refers to an individual who has been engaging in the same behavior as the main account in the same context. Community policy states that, "... for the purpose of dispute resolution when there is uncertainty whether a party is one user with sockpuppets or several users with similar editing habits they may be treated as one user with sockpuppets." As such, I am unable to grant you an unblock. Mike V • Talk 20:51, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohsinmallik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What can I do to get back on wikipedia? Also please tell me which behaviour is similair to make you think I am a Meat Puppet?

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Bbb23 (talk) 21:18, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohsinmallik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that I have been blocked because my behavior makes it seem like I am a meat puppet of Misconceptions2. I will not get involved in any articles that Misconception2 is involved in for a period of 6 months, during this time I will also make useful contributions on wikipedia. It should prove I am not a meat puppet of Misconceptions2 and flush away any doubt that I will be engaged in any meat puppetry.

I will improve articles by:

Copying an article to a draft
Find problems with article in grammar and refs
Make improvements

At Wikipedia:Community portal I see that: Iraqi University needs improvement on spelling and grammar so I will work on that on my talk page below

Decline reason:

Based on your edits, in my opinion, you are almost certainly a puppet account. In this context, I am declining your request to be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 22:18, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohsinmallik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Twice now i have asked for the edits you are referring to which makes you think I am a puppet. it is unfair to ban someone without providing evidence. my previous offer still stands. i will not be related to any edits of misconception2, my so called "puppet master". I wont edit anything he edits for 6 months. So that will prove i am not acting on behalf of anyone else. SO what is the problem? If you have any other concerns please tell me so i can address them

Decline reason:

While I understand how it can seem unfair to you that we don't share the evidence on which we base our sockpuppetry blocks, remember also that we are a private website and can run it as we see fit as long as we don't break the law. And the way we do this is ... we don't share evidence against those we block or ban for sockpuppetry because doing so would allow them to learn how to break that policy more effectively. Regardless of whether they say they were not the people who did it or not. Unfair? To you, maybe, but to us it's the lesser of two evils. And now, because this has been your fourth request and you're not offering any new arguments for unblock, I'm revoking your talk page access since any further conversations here would be a waste of our collective time. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:25, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.