User talk:MjMenuet111

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, MjMenuet111, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Temple of Caesar. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Makeemlighter (talk) 09:07, 5 August 2009 (UTC) __________________________________________[reply]

Makeemlighter
Thank you very much for your Welcome. Best
MjMenuet111 (talk) 09:16, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Temple of Caesar[edit]

Sorry, but I reverted back your revertion of my cleanup at Temple of Caesar. Your version is too problematic from the style point of view, and also contained some errors (confusion between tuff and tufa, wrong us of capitals letters everywhere, use of first plural person, etc.). If you have noticed typos or errors in the current version, please correct them. In the meantime, a thorough reading of WP:Manual of Style and WP:Vandalism, as well as a glance to how other articles are formatted, would be benefit for you. I repeat: I don't discuss the contain of your article, which was excellent, and I did my best to leave it where possible. Let me know and good work!! --'''Attilios''' (talk) 19:06, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry to tell you that I had to revert again to my last stable version the Temple of Caesar article. I don't know why you made the following corrections:

removed the <ref>...</ref> format to another cite format, often without parentheses at all!
write Antony's name in the Latin form. Here the English naming (or the name used for their article) is used normally.
again, tufa is NOT a synonym of tuff! They are two totally different rocks; the fact that some sources use them interchangeably derives from their ignorance of geology. Check the Wikipedia article I've linked please.

I think the problem is that you didn't give a glance to the other articles here and how they are written. Don't forget to give a thorough glance to Wikipedia:Manual of Style before further modifications. Let me know for any help needed or question, and good work! --'''Attilios''' (talk) 18:31, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
__________________________
Dear Mr Attilios,
Tufa and Tuff in English are synonyms (see Webster's but also and even the Wiki Article Tuff, you have never read: it is evident now).
In Archaeology and Architecture that material is called TUFA/TUFAS, everywhere!, and not TUFF.
So I understand that you are not competent in Architecture/Archaeology terminology, otherwise...
The Wiki distinction in fact is not completely correct and must be reconsidered.
About style revision, as I have already written here somewhere else, I'll be back the next days to fix and wiki-fy, and I will examine all your style suggestions.
So, please, before going on doing other things, please, read the discussion page of the article Temple of Caesar.
I thank you.
MjMenuet111 (talk) 06:56, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr. A.,
my sources (Claridge, Frischer, Stamper, etc.) are the best ones! and the Academical State of the Art today.
Sorry again, that the great Encyclopedia expert man is not aware of this and says "your sources are the wrong ones": the shame is upon you, Mr. Whatever you are! I say, the shame is upon you!
Destroying content and insulting me this way and continously is suspect and, I'm sure, is not editing.
This type of job is encyclopedically called in another way.
MjMenuet111 (talk) 07:45, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:42, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Carroballista[edit]

If you didn't notice, usually titles in ENCYCLOPEDICAL articles (and thus, here; if you didn't notice, also, Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia) are much shorter than in books or magazines. So, if the entry name is "Carroballista", there's no need to use a section title like "The structure of a Carroballista", but a simple, more sober "Structure" is sufficient. Is it clear? --'''Attilios''' (talk) 11:56, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr. A.,
my sources (Claridge, Frischer, Stamper, etc.) are the best ones! and the Academical State of the Art today.
Sorry again, that the great Encyclopedia expert man is not aware of this and says "your sources are the wrong ones": the shame is upon you, Mr. Whatever you are! I say, the shame is upon you!
Destroying content and insulting me this way and continously is suspect and, I'm sure, is not editing.
This type of job is encyclopedically called in another way.
MjMenuet111 (talk) 07:46, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr. M[edit]

Dear Mr. M, you have just reported [[1]]. So please keep your behaviour humbler and calmer, otherwise you'll be banned. That's a pity, since your knowledge would be useful. Your problem is that you don't listen to advices and don't accept the others' opinions and knowledge. This is a community, where the articles are the result of a shared knowledge, each one adding a brick, little or big, for what they can. You added a very interesting content from your strong field, archaeology; why you can't accept mine and user:Johnbod's in Wikipedia format and geology? Let me know. --'''Attilios''' (talk) 08:10, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About Attilios' mobbing and threatening behaviour[edit]

I know through all the messages you have left everywhere, that you are heavily insulting me with every type of insulting words. I have already written everywhere that I had accepted your advice and was going to fix the style and wiki-fy the article in the next days: but you were not satisfied.

Your behaviour style "do what I want or I'll kill you" is not acceptable in any case and now I am really scared by your aggression and scaring behaviour.

I called an investigation upon you and your threatening, scaring and mobbing behaviour against me.

MjMenuet111 (talk) 09:38, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring and sockpuppetry at Temple of Caesar[edit]

Hello MjMenuet111. Some of your edits at Temple of Caesar suggest inexperience with using Wikipedia. Though User:Attilios is not known to me by name, I see that User:Johnbod has been taking a hand recently on this article. He is a well-known contributor to featured articles, so you should probably take an interest in whatever advice he might have to offer. When you accuse long-time contributors of vandalism, it reduces your own credibility.

Menuet111 (talk · contribs), even if he is your brother, is well-advised to stop contributing to the same articles that you do. Per our WP:Sockpuppet policy, he risks being blocked from editing Wikipedia. There will be no further warning. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:00, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Errors[edit]

Finally I had chance to check the errors in Temple of Caesar that you attributed to me. Stay sure I didn't write them at all! Maybe they came from the previous version (strange, since their poor encyclopedical writing style looks exactly like yours; maybe it's your "brother"). Anyway, I've corrected them. As you can see, and differently from you in the case of tuff, I recognize you're expert in the field, so no problem to implement what you ask if it's reasonable. Which other errors did you notice? Make me a list and I will correct them. Ciao and good work! --'''Attilios''' (talk) 21:21, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Dacia[edit]

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in ancient Dacia. Would you like to join the WikiProject Dacia? It is a project aimed to better organize and improve the quality and accuracy of the articles related to these topics. We need help expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need more images. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 05:09, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, MjMenuet111. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]