User talk:MikutoH

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asexual flag has been accepted[edit]

Asexual flag, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:13, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

Hello, MikutoH,

If you are considering creating categories that include gender, sexual orientation or sexual identity, please read, carefully, Wikipedia:Categorizing articles about people#EGRS. To categorize an individual based on sexual orientation or sexual identity, it must be verified in their article content. Please be careful, more caution is taken with these categories than those based on occupation or nationality. If you have questions, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:46, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, you are not creating appropriate category redirects. They are not created like an article redirect. Please use {{category redirect|Category:Target category}}. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:49, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They have created a discussion at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_March_17#Category:LGBT_people_by_identity for renaming the root category into "variation".

I think most people would strongly consider this term a form of othering that people would not be okay with for self-identification as a root category. A persons sexual/romantic orientations and gender identities are not some kind of variation, they are their orientations and identities. Raladic (talk) 05:17, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: if you're referring to the non-binary gay men category, as I said in WT:LGBT, I used WP:PetScan so all biographies I categorized were already in the parent categories (Category:Gay men and Category:People with non-binary gender identities). I made redirects because I can't rename categories in enwiki, bots already automatically replace the redirect with the template you cited, and I was the category creator, so I guess WP:CUT doesn't apply to this case since it's a category and it's a common practice in my native project (ptwiki). But I will put the template next time instead of redirecting.

@Raladic: you already talked about that in the RfD. I agree that's not the best option. I started the renaming discussion because people expressed they were uncomfortable with the existing category before in other RfD, as I pointed in the rationale. The reason I chose variation was merely because the original category in the simplewiki, as I also pointed in the rationale. And as I also said, the consensus could result in reparenting the intervening/interleaving subcategories (aka merging) instead of renaming. If someone comes with a better name, I would support. And I'm neutral in the current name. --MikutoH ^talk! 20:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Non-binary lesbians has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Non-binary lesbians has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Non-binary lesbian[edit]

Hello, MikutoH

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Smasongarrison and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Non-binary lesbian, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 7 § Non-binary lesbian.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Smasongarrison}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mason (talk) 21:59, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gender incongruence has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Gender incongruence has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:15, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Women city councillors in Brazil[edit]

Hello, MikutoH,

Please do not tag full categories for speedy deletion. They can't be deleted if they aren't empty. Please nominate it for a speedy rename at WP:CFD, this can not be handled through CSD, there are editors who focus on handling categories that are decided in CFD discussions. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:48, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: why is there an option on twinkle for moving through speedy deletion then? I thought it would lead automatically to the speedy rename process. --MikutoH ^talk! 03:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Plurisexuality[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Plurisexuality, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:59, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, MikutoH. Thank you for your work on Non-monosexual. Voorts, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 03:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Romantic orientation[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Romantic orientation, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Americophobia[edit]

A tag has been placed on Americophobia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Blank page with no content.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Marleeashton (talk) 01:52, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unlabeled moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Unlabeled, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. EdmHopLover1995 (talk) 23:09, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unlabeled (April 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should begin with a good definition, but expand on the subject. You might try creating a definition for this instead at Wiktionary, which is a dictionary. Please only do so if it meets that sister project's criteria for inclusion. These require among others, attestation for the word or phrase, as verified through clear widespread use, or its use in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Unlabeled and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:35, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MikutoH! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 01:35, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hi MikutoH. Thank you for your work on Ceteroromantic. Another editor, Voorts, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 22:59, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hi MikutoH. Thank you for your work on Pluriromantic. Another editor, Voorts, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please avoid double redirects.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 23:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox on Transgender flag[edit]

Moved to Talk:Transgender flag § "Most prominent" flag

– --MikutoH ^talk! 00:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]