User talk:Midori No Sora/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:26, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| For fighting vandalism and protecting Wikipedia. The person who loves reading (talk) 00:35, 20 March 2023 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 20 March 2023
- News and notes: Wikimania submissions deadline looms, Russian government after our lucky charms, AI woes nix CNET from RS slate
- Eyewitness: Three more stories from Ukrainian Wikimedians
- In the media: Paid editing, plagiarism payouts, proponents of a ploy, and people peeved at perceived preferences
- Featured content: Way too many featured articles
- Interview: 228/2/1: the inside scoop on Aoidh's RfA
- Traffic report: Who died? Who won? Who lost?
"Human Nature" Revision
Hello, recently I made an edit to the human nature page which you reverted back. My reason for the edit was due to the section needing citations, thus making revisions accordingly [to the sources found]. NNoble07 (talk) 19:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- @NNoble07, I think there is some mistake.. I've reverted a disruptive editing which was done by an IP address (this).
- Looking back at the page history, this user has reverted your edit saying it is non-WP:RS and has a "pov problem". Layah50♪ ( 話して～! ) 23:15, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Layah50, thank you for your clarification. Since this section of the page needs citations, I would gladly like to work on it with you, possibly and hopefully coming up with something better and more useful than the original.
- I have changed the citation that may be deemed unreliable, now citing, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- Here is a link to the topic: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/medieval-philosophy/#WhenDidMediPhilEnd NNoble07 (talk) 19:35, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 03 April 2023
- From the editor: Some long-overdue retractions
- News and notes: Sounding out, a universal code of conduct, and dealing with AI
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" case is ongoing
- Featured content: Hail, poetry! Thou heav'n-born maid
- Recent research: Language bias: Wikipedia captures at least the "silhouette of the elephant", unlike ChatGPT
- From the archives: April Fools' through the ages
- Disinformation report: Sus socks support suits, seems systemic
The Signpost: 26 April 2023
- News and notes: Staff departures at Wikimedia Foundation, Jimbo hands in the bits, and graphs' zeppelin burns
- In the media: Contested truth claims in Wikipedia
- Obituary: Remembering David "DGG" Goodman
- Arbitration report: Holocaust in Poland, Jimbo in the hot seat, and a desysopping
- Special report: Signpost statistics between years 2005 and 2022
- News from the WMF: Collective planning with the Wikimedia Foundation
- Featured content: In which we described the featured articles in rhyme again
- From the archives: April Fools' through the ages, part two
- Humour: The law of hats
- Traffic report: Long live machine, the future supreme
The Signpost: 8 May 2023
- News and notes: New legal "deVLOPments" in the EU
- In the media: Vivek's smelly socks, online safety, and politics
- Recent research: Gender, race and notability in deletion discussions
- Featured content: I wrote a poem for each article, I found rhymes for all the lists; My first featured picture of this year now finally exists!
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" approaches conclusion
- News from the WMF: Planning together with the Wikimedia Foundation
Trouted
|
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: it's not a wikipedia citation, appears to be copied from somewhere else 47.155.234.113 (talk) 07:32, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- I saw it wrong, sorry about that.. 🛧Layah50♪🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう！) 07:35, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- alright cool thanks, the first one was a typo to begin with sorry Guninvalid (talk) 07:44, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Problematic editor
The IP editor you warned for their conduct in 2015 kidnapping and beheading of Copts in Libya has been repeatedly warned about similar conduct. Do you have a preferred approach for dealing with their conduct if it continues? I think 3RR applies but ANI might help bring a longer-lasting remedy (whether it be a more formal warning or a more relevant admin action). ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:41, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Pbritti Yeah, I've already reported the IP address to the AIV. Yes, I've decided to give up warning as the user keeps deleting them. Thanks for checking! 🛧Layah50♪🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう！) 18:48, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Roeslin page
What was wrong with my source? Both of them were academic papers that were on Jstor.OUvsFSU (talk) 18:24, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't mean to revert your edit. I've undone the revert. 🛧Layah50♪🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう！) 18:27, 12 May 2023 (UTC)