User talk:Meduna.Wiki

Speedy deletion nomination of Bertha von Meduna[edit]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Bertha von Meduna, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 11:13, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested. It is a well-sourced article about a notable person / historic figure. The speedy deletion notice makes no sense and harms the integrity of the author in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Meduna.Wiki (talk) 11:21, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Meduna.Wiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Rosiestep (talk) 19:31, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Rosiestep, thank you for the kind words of welcome (incl. cookies!) and sharing the helpful pages - I will be more than happy to take a closer look! Best, Meduna.Wiki (talk) 20:00, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Close connection with the topics you're editing?[edit]

Hi Meduna.Wiki and thanks for editing Wikipedia. I'm a WP:NPP and came across an article you created recently, Bertha von Meduna. I noticed that your username also includes the word "Meduna", which made me curious about a possible connection. When I looked at your December 2023 contribution history, I noticed that several of the articles you've been creating/editing also contain that word. Note, it is okay to write about long-dead family members(!) ... as long as you're adhering to Wikipedia's core policies regarding WP:N, WP:RS, WP:V, WP:NPOV and, WP:COI. Would you kindly address the potential close connection? It's quite possible that your username and the subjects you are editing have no connection. For the sake of transparency, it's important to clarify the confusion. Thank you, and happy holidays.

Rosiestep (talk) 19:36, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Rosiestep, thank you for raising this and giving me an opportunity to clarify! While I am still very new to Wikipedia, I did try to research to the best of my abilities in order to only post content that strictly adheres to Wikipedia's policies, in particular WP:COI, which I understand is your main point of inquiry here.

My last name is "Meduna" and a while ago I embarked on researching the origins and different family histories of the surname, which ultimately led me to summarize some existing literature in the Wikipedia articles you listed to further the interests of the encyclopedia (hence also the username).

The noable persons in your list all bear that surname but of course none of them relate in any other way neither to myself or my family (none of them in a direct ancestral relationship - so even if, as you clarified, it is okay to write about long-dead family members, I would not consider that to be the case) - nor, of course, friends, clients, employers, or my financial and other relationships.

Long story short, my contributions have been driven by the interest to share notable (WP:N) information about the surname from a neutral point of view (WP:NPOV), using reliable (WP:RS) and verifiable (WP:V) sources.

If there is need for any additional clarity or if you have further guidance that can help me to improve my contributions in line with Wikipedia policies and standards, do not hesitate to follow up!

Many thanks,

Meduna.Wiki (talk) 20:14, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And happy holidays to you as well, @Rosiestep! Meduna.Wiki (talk) 20:19, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Meduna.Wiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 84.115.223.181. I am not running any kind of proxy or IP changing software. Meduna.Wiki (talk) 09:41, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed p2p proxy. See Template:Blocked p2p proxy for more details. Yamla (talk) 12:46, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.