User talk:Matthewjames2001

December 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm AnEditor1234. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Steve Tupling have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. AnEditor1234 (talk) 13:33, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Matt Rhead. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Matt Rhead was changed by Matthewjames2001 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870013 on 2018-12-20T13:44:38+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:44, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Whitley Bay F.C., you may be blocked from editing. Just curious, do you have other accounts called PapaEth, Copperbay, and Huddohudson? Anon. U. 14:32, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Huddohudson, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Anon. U. 15:04, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mohamed Diamé. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:05, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 15:46, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]