User talk:Masterofthename

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Masterofthename, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Zargarian Synagogue, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Darkness Shines (talk) 17:09, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zargarian Synagogue[edit]

The article Zargarian Synagogue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:09, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zargarian Synagogue for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zargarian Synagogue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zargarian Synagogue until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Darkness Shines (talk) 08:33, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Solomon's Temple, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Menorah. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gentile, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of the Jews in Iran, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cyrus and Zand. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Anetta Kahane) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Anetta Kahane, Masterofthename!

Wikipedia editor NearEMPTiness just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for uploading this article, which is interesting to read, indeed.

To reply, leave a comment on NearEMPTiness's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Ways to improve Anetta Kahane[edit]

Hi, I'm NearEMPTiness. Masterofthename, thanks for creating Anetta Kahane!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I recommend changing the bare URLs into full citations, please.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:10, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sam Mizrahi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iranian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting Edits[edit]

Hi, thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. You have recently reverted a change to Sam Mizrahi from another editor, while they provided the reasoning for the edit on Talk page and left a comment on the edit, you did neither. Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopedia, meaning that you should first try to discuss changes, and at least give reason for doing them.

Please see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons

Editors must take particular care when adding information about living persons to any Wikipedia page. Such material requires a high degree of sensitivity, and must adhere strictly to all applicable laws in the United States, to this policy, and to Wikipedia's three core content policies:

Vandalism Warning[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sam Mizrahi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ntb613 (talk) 07:13, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

Your recent editing history at Sam Mizrahi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 07:03, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Masterofthename. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of János Rónai[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on János Rónai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.yivoencyclopedia.org/article.aspx/Ronai_Janos. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rentier (talk) 10:49, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Masterofthename. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alert[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

All IP editors, accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. This prohibition is preferably enforced by the use of extended confirmed protection, but where that is not feasible, it may also be enforced by reverts, page protections, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters.Shrike (talk) 12:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You was already told not to edit articles about the conflict till you reach 500 edits if you will do it again I will report you. --Shrike (talk) 06:06, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Masterofthename. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Mahmoud_Reza_Khavari, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. I see you are back after 2 years, and are again reverting edits without explanation. Shemtovca (talk) 01:54, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Shemtovca. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mahmoud_Reza_Khavari have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. The reasons are specified on talk page Talk:Mahmoud_Reza_Khavari. Doing another revert of my changes will also bring up the WP:3RR Shemtovca (talk) 16:24, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been trying to remove sourced information linking Mahmoud Reza Khavari and Sam Mizrahi for over two years now. The connection is made by published articles, it is not a defamation and there has been numerous articles making this connection. I believe you are biased on this case and should refrain from removing sourced material on this topic. Masterofthename (talk) 17:14, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Masterofthename reported by User:Shemtovca (Result: ). Thank you. Shemtovca (talk) 17:28, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

Despite the warning, you have continued with the invective ([1], [2]). Therefore, you have been blocked from editing for 24 hours. Please do better. Thanks. El_C 00:34, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Masterofthename (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User:Shemtovca is trying to remove sourced information from published articles that he thinks is bad for the subject of this page, and User:El_c is assisting him by blocking me instead of him.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:18, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Masterofthename (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the edits that i did was restoring the page in order to protect it from organized vandalism, * first edit * second edit * third edit, the other user is clearly performing vandalism, removing information that was properly cited from a respectable Canadian journal.There is coordinated efforts to silence this information and remove the link between Kharavi and Mizrahi from wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Reviewing this and the request at UTRS, it is clear you are here insist you are right. Stating as you did on UTRS "Coordinated effort by the user:Shemtovca and user:El_C to silence any information that might be bad for Israel, both users are hardcore supporters of state of Israel and use their power to remove information from Wikipedia." this only furthers that point. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:11, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reviewing admin should check the contents of UTRS #24694 too. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:28, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
and yet none of you even addressed the point that removing material that was referenced from a published article is considered vandalism, rules apparently don't apply anymore in this age. Masterofthename (talk) 04:28, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That's not the Wikipedia definition of vandalism - please read WP:Vandalism. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:54, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Missing Iranian oil rig[edit]

The article Missing Iranian oil rig has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't think this article meets the notability for Events as it doesn't meet the following Inclusion criteria:
WP:LASTING

WP:GEOSCOPE

WP:INDEPTH

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shemtovca (talk) 16:32, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019[edit]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Shemtovca (talk) 15:15, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't understand your logic, you believed that the part about Khashayar Khavari and Sam Mizrahi did not really belong to Mahmoud Reza Khavari's page, so I accepted your opinion and just moved that information to a new page about Khashayar Khavari and you considered that an attack page ? Read Wikipedia:Attack page definition before accusing other people of attack. Masterofthename (talk) 15:13, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some facts:

Khashayar Khavari is not notable and can't have his own page due to WP:BLP1E.
Aside of that it also was written as an attack page WP:ATTACK
I only suggested it to be deleted, but not actually deleted it.
It was deleted by User:RHaworth, an administrator who has over 150 thousand edits behind him... Who agreed that the page you created fits the definition of WP:ATTACK
And i am not threatening you or anyone else with a block, that's the message that is auto generated by the template when a page is suggested for Speedy Deletion. If you had more experience on Wikipedia you would have known that.

So stop your ridiculous accusations. Why are you so obsessed with having this included somewhere, anywhere? If you are only doing it because you thought it belongs on Wikipedia you can leave it alone now since you see it doesn't and go read the actual rules, not what you think they should be. Shemtovca (talk) 17:31, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree he might not be notable, but he was involved in building one of the most important buildings in Toronto, The one, which has its own wikipedia page, and also Sam Mizrahi, his business partner has a wikipedia page, so one can argue both ways. Asides from that, moving information from Mahmoud Reza Khavari's page to Khashayar Mizrahi's own page is not an attack, I just simply moved the information that you deemed inappropriate for that page because of the subject matter not because of tone, to his own page. Anyways I think your approach to this subject is over emotional and illogical, you can call your friends to ban or block my id, but at some point in the future people will realize what you are doing and did.Masterofthename (talk) 18:49, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Missing Iranian oil rig for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Missing Iranian oil rig is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Missing Iranian oil rig until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shemtovca (talk) 02:42, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roy Sebag, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Burgerim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abraham Salz[edit]

In your article Abraham Salz, you mention he is born in 1841. The German, Hebrew and arabic articles mention the date of 1864. Please check. Regards.--FLLL (talk) 13:26, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gentile, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ethnos.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]