User talk:MastCell/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
Praise
Hey there. I just noticed your edits pop up on the recent changes page, and I have to say, this is some very good stuff.
Not only is it good, useful information, it's well-written.
We need more contributors like you. Keep at it! DS 22:44, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
ABC article
Thanks. It sure wasn't/isn't easy. - RoyBoy 800 01:52, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- You are a scholar and a gentle(person). While indeed sometimes I can get annoyed at things getting inaccurate, after I calm myself it is obvious things were inaccurate to begin with. And only by continuing to bounce opinions and ideas off each other can we arrive at a truly superior article. Quite frankly you are the best person to work with on this article; as we disagree on the conclusion of the ABC issue, but we both see there is enough ambiguity in the evidence for us both to be somewhat wrong. - RoyBoy 800 03:19, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi MastCell
Wow, you've certainly made a productive start here this month! You're additions have been great! I've had fun putting up endoscopy images, but the hard part is getting consent from patients for their release. You should join us at WP:CLINMED, the Clinical Medicine Wikiproject, and at WP:GI, WikiProject Gastroenterology where we have fun bouncing article ideas off each other. If you haven't met User:Jfdwolff, he's a fabulous editor and administrator to work with, and laid the foundations for a tonne of the medical articles here. Take care -- Samir धर्म 05:52, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
- Hi once more, and welcome to WP:CLINMED! Keep the histamine flowing and hope to see you around! PS: If you're interested, we're working on Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Medicine-related articles): have a look!--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 14:56, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Great job! It looks fabulous. I had a couple of things I wanted to add, one of which is a picture that I have but need to get patient consent for its release -- Samir धर्म 04:37, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Melanoma edit
I liked your edit of my contribution to the Moh's section under melanoma. Much more fluid now. Cheers. RobDroliver 15:59, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Featured Article: AML
Kudos on the AML article accolades--well-deserved after your hard work on it. Keep up the quality contributions.
Chavoguero 01:58, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you
MastCell, thanks for taking the time to make this comment. It means so much more coming from you and I really appreciate your 2 cents;) And yes, your right, we use little CT anymore with MRI available, but most of us don't even order them until they have failed to respond, that is if we don't just send them to the surgeon. Most xrays are to rule out contraindications to spinal manipulation which means two or three views. It's nice to know that someone understands that is a necessary risk to prevent iatrogenic injury. --Dematt 04:24, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- MastCell -- a fellow Dr Strangelove fan I presume! In any case, if the profanity on the pseudoscience talk page offended you, I apologise, but you're really need to read the archives from three or four days ago to see how we got to that point. Also, Krishna commented to your post here. You may wish to reply (or not). But, if you stick with it for a few days (if you have the time) you might see the dynamic of the page and might even feel tempted to use profanity as well. Also, I echo Dematt's thanks. •Jim62sch• 19:55, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
not really
I'm not really back, but I have been really impressed with your edits and postings. I think you show an open mind and sense of fair play. I did want to thank you for your email and wanted to let you know that the last thing I did before I cleaned off my page was read your user page. I absolutely love it. You are obviously a quality individual and I would have enjoyed working closer with you. Where were you when we needed you;) -- Dēmatt (chat) 00:52, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- That's very kind. I can understand if this was the impetus for you leaving - it was just an unpleasant situation all around. Anyhow, thanks for the kind words, and your presence is definitely missed. The whole Quackwatch thing is a little too exhausting, and it's actually not something I care that deeply about, so I've been trying to cut back my input there and spend my Wikipedia time elsewhere. I hope that after you have a well-deserved break and some time away from this contentious alternate universe, our paths cross again. MastCell Talk 03:09, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Fan Club
Just found this while googling, [[1]] Shot info 01:16, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Featured Article
Hey, MastCell. I added your Featured Article Candidate to the Collaboration Dashboard at Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine. I hope that this helps to draw more people to the review! -Severa (!!!) 03:30, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comments. I gave the table thing a shot - take a look and see what you think. Thanks for taking the time to look at the article and make suggestions for its improvement. MastCell Talk 16:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Just noticed the article's promotion to FA. Congratulations! Fvasconcellos 20:48, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks... I hadn't noticed it went through till you mentioned it. Awesome. MastCell Talk 21:00, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Well done, MastCell. I'll e-mail you an MRCP and CT scan tonight, approved for release under GFDL 74.12.77.59 03:30, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
You know, I really enjoyed that essay, you know. Heh. JFW | T@lk 06:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome
I am having fun learning the ropes of Wikipedia. Currently adding things related to my fellowship in hematopathology. I have a mindmap of hematopathology and an XML schema for pathology that I will post at some point. Appreciate the feedback.Jdln 15:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)