User talk:Markzy90

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Markzy90, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Dj Kentalky, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 02:06, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dj Kentalky[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dj Kentalky, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —C.Fred (talk) 02:06, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Miracle chike mark.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Miracle chike mark.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:05, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	Thanks very much on your idea. Cynthiakruz (talk) 17:07, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Kiss Daniel, did not appear constructive and has been or will be undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 15:10, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of DJ Shabsy for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DJ Shabsy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Shabsy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 15:17, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Shabsy[edit]

As you are the creator of the DJ Shabsy article, you may not declare the AfD as withdrawn and it is not your AfD to withdraw. Your closure of the AfD is also inappropriate per the guidelines for non-admin closures as you clearly have violated both criteria #1 and #2. Please do not attempt to close the AfD again as such closures will be viewed as disruptive. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:04, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: The nominator does not close the AfD. An admin will close the AfD. In this case, the AfD has been relisted by MBisanz for further discussion. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:04, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DJ Kentalky[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on DJ Kentalky, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:11, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: The article was deleted because it was was a duplicate of the article Dj Kentalky that was previously determined by consensus to be deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dj Kentalky. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: I read both your version and the previously deleted version that was deleted during the Articles for Deletion discussion. Your version does not make any additional claims towards notability than the previously deleted version. If you wish to contest the result of the AfD, please ask Jenks24 to review their determination of consensus in the discussion (though consensus was unanimous) or follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Deletion review. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:48, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Oluwa2Chainz. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Humblesmith have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 16:33, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oluwa2Chainz Thanks for you reply you are right but am i permitted to make an update on Humblesmith article. Is not for a promotion purpose.--Markzy90 (talk) 20:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Markzy90 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no multiple account on Wikipedia neither have i vote for any sock-puppet on wikipedia, the only account which i have is Markzy90 that is why i stated about me, i mean everything about me so that my user page can be better known, i don"t associate my self with sock-puppet to prevent my account from being blocked. Please kindly make a great research again, I have all evidence to show that i am real markzy90 is my only official account i have on Wikipedia. You can ask anything about me am ready to answer all. I have not seen any good reason for me to be blocked as a sock-puppet abusing many account that is a big mistake which am wondering about. Please unblock my account with a good statement which you would not like me to be involve again and i promise not to be involve, Am open to everybody on Wikipedia. Am appealing for my account because i hate creating another account for my self when i know i have a Wikipedia account which the block issue can be resolve. That is wasting of time or criminal act to me creating another account. I am ready to give you all identity about me because i hide nothing in common. I will be very glad to here a response from an administrator @Gogo Dodo:, @Mark Arsten:, @Richwales:, @Salvidrim:, @Someguy1221:, @Vanjagenije:, @Oluwa2Chainz: thanks.--Markzy90 (talk) 10:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The CheckUser results make it clear that it's either sockpuppetry or coordinated paid-editing. The block is appropriate either way. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:55, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Markzy90 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Administrators that was what am saying my block was "unfair" according to the investigation, User:Cynthiakruz and User:Skito58 might be the sockpuppetry not me who have being on Wikipedia over 28days and have not support any sockpuppetry . I have never supported a sockpuppetry or voted a sockpuppetry on Wikipedia. That is why i explained every thing about me on my userpage because wikipedia policy says so. I know why i was blocked because of an sockpuppetry and i promise never to do anything with a sockpuppetry. I am a trusted person with good habit, i stick to my words never to do what i was blocked for anymore, i always prevent corruption on Wikipedia if you check my logs thanks.

Decline reason:

This request does not adequately address the reason for your block. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 18:43, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--Markzy90 (talk) 15:26, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You don't seem to understand what sockpuppetry means here. Please read that link, as well as WP:COI and WP:PAID. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ohnoitsjamie: I now understand very well. This was interesting reading, I promise not to involve my self in such again, "promise is a depth". I plead for my account because i don"t want to be a banned user on Wikipedia is not a good status to me thanks.--Markzy90 (talk) 18:58, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You e-mailed me, asking me to comment on your block. Since your block was put into effect primarily on the basis of this report by an admin with CheckUser access rights, I (as a non-CheckUser) do not by policy have any authority to overturn your block — nor do I even have the technical ability to evaluate the CheckUser evidence supporting the conclusion that this account (Markzy90) is a sockpuppet of Coal Press Nation. If you insist that, despite whatever evidence may have been found, you are not in fact someone using multiple accounts, then you need to address your complaint to Ponyo (the CheckUser who said sockpuppetry was "likely" in this case), or to the Functionaries e-mail list, or to the Arbitration Committee e-mail list. — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 00:20, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]